Soldier On! w/Leroy Garrett   — Occasional Essays


Essay 58 (1-31-05)

CONGREGATIONS UNITE — A NEW BEGINNING?

Last October Ouida and I drove to Beaumont, Texas to be with two congregations that are in process of merging. One was the Cornerstone Church of Christ and the other was the Parkside Christian Church. We met in the facility of the latter. They had been in conversation for some months. Since both congregations were of the Restoration Movement, they thought my input would provide some historical perspective for what they were up to.

We had a great weekend together, including a Saturday seminar on "Our Heritage and Destiny." I pointed out that our distinct heritage in the Restoration tradition is to "unite the Christians in all the sects," as our pioneers put it. Our several mottoes, such as; "In essentials, unity; in opinions, liberty; in all things, love," were unity mottoes. Our founding documents, such as Thomas Campbell's Declaration and Address, were unity documents. And the biblical principles they forged on the rugged American frontier, such as believers accepting each other on the same basis that Christ accepted them, were unity principles.

Moreover, I observed, our heritage dates back to 1832 when two separate unity movements - one led by Barton Stone and the other by Alexander Campbell - became one unity movement. Our pioneers practiced what they preached! Even though there were substantive differences between them, they united on the basics - the essentials - and allowed for liberty in areas of opinion and methods.

It was unity in diversity - and they learned first hand that is the only kind of unity there is. They practiced what Alexander Campbell had been teaching: "We do not ask that they give up their opinions, for they can hold their opinions as private property; we only ask that they not impose their opinions upon others as tests of fellowship." That principle captures the essence of our heritage.

As for our destiny, it is related to our heritage. Our immediate goal in the Stone-Campbell tradition is for each congregation to be united among itself - and with all sister churches -- by the same spiritual ties that may one day unite us to all Christians. But in the meantime we will assume our part of the responsibility that rests upon the church universal. This includes not only preaching the gospel, but the alleviation of human suffering in all its forms, whether tyranny, injustice, gross inequality, hunger, racism. In short, as the body of Christ on earth we are to do what Christ did in the body when he was on earth. This means the church is Christ's ongoing incarnation.

And then in a future beyond our present vision, but not beyond the reach of our faith and hope, we lose our distinct identity as Christian Churches/Churches of Christ and become united with the body of Christ at large. In a vision of such a destiny we are true to our heritage in that the Stone/Campbell merger was inspired by the mandate of The Last Will and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery: "Let this body die, be dissolved, and sink into union with the body of Christ at large."

I placed before the seminar a question out of our heritage that should continue to challenge us: Are we willing for Christian Churches and Churches of Christ - as we have come to know them - to dissolve and merge into union with the church universal? If we are less than forthright about our own dissolution in favor of the larger unity, we are not yet free of sectarianism. It becomes a matter of whether we desire the unity our Lord prayed for more than we love our own party.

On Saturday evening we had dinner fellowship with the leaders of both congregations where we discussed some of the practical issues of congregations uniting. We agreed that it is love that binds us as one in Christ, not unanimity of doctrine or opinion. We also agreed that unity of any kind - whether a marriage or a friendship or a church union -necessarily involves a certain amount of tension. There will be problems. This is because there will always be differences in any relationship. We can no more see everything alike than we can look alike.

This is why Paul in Eph. 4:2-3 called for "lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love" when he talked of "endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace." Unity is not realized through agreement on "the issues" - and each party has its own list! -- but through forbearing love. If unity were a matter of conformity of viewpoint there would be nothing to forbear!

I urged the leaders to beware of a fatal fallacy as they moved toward unity - called the "either/or fallacy" in logic. Sects are founded on it - It can be only one way! - when it might be, not either/or but both/and. A church doesn't have to be either scapula or instrumental in its singing. It might be both. They decided to sing half the songs acappella and half with instrumentation.

That was the way our pioneers handled "the instrument" issue when it began to appear in the congregations during the 1850s. We had churches that used the instrument and those that did not. No big deal and no divisions. It was that way for decades until "Editor Bishops" came along who insisted it can be only one way.

On the Lord's Day I addressed the uniting congregations in one assembly on the church as a community of hope. When a church has that hope that never disappoints (Rom. 5:5) and that endures forever (1 Cor. 13:13) it will be a united church. That is why Paul included the "one hope" as one of the seven principles of unity in Eph. 4. Hope transcends factionalism and sectarianism.

Well, all this said, the two churches did not need me all that much to effect their merger, but my efforts may have lent both biblical and historical support. The good news is that they are now on the verge of the merger, and the Church of Christ will soon move into the facility of the Christian Church, and they will then have what one of the leaders calls "something new."

The local paper, The Beaumont Enterprise, picked up on this unusual story and gave it front page coverage in its "Faith and Values" section. It captioned the story "Reunited," drawing upon the historical fact that the two churches were part of a movement that was once united. The story credited Steve Molnar, a local business man and a lay minister among Churches of Christ, as the catalyst behind the effort. He encouraged the two ministers - Jerry Fenter of the Church of Christ and Winston Hancock of the Christian Church - to begin the conversations that led to the merger.

I titled my rendition of the story as "A New Beginning?" because it could be reflective of a spirit of unity that is sweeping across the landscape of these two churches in a dramatic way. Recent developments involving Christian Churches and Churches of Christ indicate that what is happening in Beaumont may be but a taste of things to come.

I list a few significant developments that I happen to know about: (1) the upcoming Stone-Campbell Encyclopedia, a publication of monumental significance, is the work of scholars from these two churches, along with Disciples of Christ; (2) the ongoing Restoration Forum, now into its third decade, is a unity effort between these churches, as is the more recent Stone-Campbell Dialogue, and both include Disciples of Christ; (3) a recent gathering in Texas, called Impact 2004, of 300 leaders from these two churches explored ways to work together; (4) the North American Christian Convention in 2006, a ministry of Christian Churches, will include leaders from Churches of Christ, and together they will look for ways to undo what happened in 1906, the date usually given for the separation of Churches of Christ.

Add to this what is happening in the trenches. Rick Atchley, minister to one of the largest Churches of Christ, has stated publicly that he will dedicate the rest of his life to restoring fellowship between the two churches. Rick refers to his sisters and brothers in Christian Churches as family he did not for most of his life realize that he had! And he speaks for many others who are sick and tired of the divisions that have sidetracked a glorious unity movement.

Perhaps I should add that the Christian Standard, leading journal of Christian Churches and the oldest ongoing journal in the Restoration tradition (1866) in its current issue features an interview with Leroy Garrett. Captioned "Encouraging Unity," the interview, which took place at the Madison Christian Church in Groveport, Ohio last year, surveys some of the unity efforts I have been part of through the decades.

The journal's cover artistically features "UNITY: Past, Present, and Future," and asks, "Can Three Streams (of the Restoration Movement) Become One?" And there is an essay by Lynn Anderson of Churches of Christ on "Two Hundred Years and Counting" in which he reviews the history of the Movement and its divisions, and concludes with these words that reflect the spirit and tone of Thomas Campbell's Declaration and Address.

"Let us be done with hostility. It is high time for each of us to leave behind our self-perceptions of superiority and whatever deep wounds we may have received from the past. Let us stand together eagerly at the place of level ground - at the foot of the cross."

It's in the air. Don't you feel it?

Personal

Those interested in all the essays of this series, 58 so far, will find them at www.leroygarrett.org. We will add names to our subscription list upon request. Cecil Hook has invited me to join him at his booth (B6) at the ACU Lectures, Feb. 20-23. The purpose is to make our books available, but we will be more interested in seeing those who come by. Maybe you can be among the number.

[TOP].