UNITING
OR ACCEPTING?
Cecil Hook
We are
hearing of unity meetings in which the participants work to break
down the walls that separate our differing groups. Those efforts are
to be commended and encouraged. What I am about to say is not
intended to be overly critical of them.
Instead
of having unity meetings, however, should we not be having accepting
meetings? God has already created the unity. All who are in Christ
are in one body. The church is one and cannot be divided into two or
more churches or bodies. When we separate into groups because of our
differences, we only become sectarian. The person who rejects other
brothers and sisters in Christ is sectarian in spirit and practice.
It is not the meeting in different groups that is sinful but it is
the refusing to recognize others who are in God’s family. God
put us in the same body; let us learn to accept each other.
If we are
in Christ, we are children of God and members of his spiritual
family. He has only one family. Our efforts should not be directed
toward creating one family of God but to the accepting of other
brothers and sisters whom God has given us in the family he has
already created. It is a sin against the father to reject his other
children.
In the
parable about the prodigal son, the father had a united family even
while the prodigal was away and also after his return. The two sons
were brothers in the same family of the same father all the time.
Upon the return of the profligate one, the older brother rejected
him. They were still brothers but one judged the other to be unworthy
when he should have left the judging to the father. The father had
accepted him fully. We condemn ourselves when we judge and turn away
from our brother.
It was
the brother who was so obedient, good, and right who was the greater
disappointment. His rejection of his brother, if sustained, would be
more of a long-range threat to the family than the sins of the flesh
of the brother. The sins of immorality were repented of, but the
parable leaves us with a self-righteous older brother who thought he
was too good to stoop to receive his brother who had erred.
That is
the same kind of rejecting attitude that plagues the older brothers
in God’s family today.
To have
accepted the errant brother back would not have given endorsement to
his pig-pen conduct. Brotherhood did not originate from nor depend
upon their conduct, but it was the result of having the same father.
Surely, the young son had lived a filthy life of which neither the
father nor the son could approve. But the father was the only one who
could rightly judge, disinherit, or disclaim him. The older brother
was stuck with him!
In the
dead church at Sardis there were a few good brothers who had not
wandered into the far country. “Yet you have still a few names
in Sardis, people who have not soiled their garments.” The
delinquent ones were called upon to repent, but the older brothers
were not called upon to judge and reject them.
Brothers
do not decide to fellowship each other in order to unite in the
father’s family. It is not fellowship him and then unite with
him, but rather recognize the fellowship that the family relationship
creates.
Should
the Church of Christ accept the Christian Church, and visa versa? No,
for acceptance is an individual matter. Each of us must accept all
the children of God without regard to the particular names worn to
distinguish their sectarian exclusiveness.
Children
of God are separated into splintered groups. When the various
individuals in these churches accept other brothers and sisters
across our divisive lines, we can come to appreciate that there is
one body, one church.
Since
all who are in the one body do not accept each other, it seems
appropriate that we have accepting meetings in order to work toward
healing the sores caused by our sin of alienation. But since
acceptance is not a corporate action, you need not wait for meetings
to bring it about. Just begin individually to accept all of God’s
children with whom he has united you in one body.—1350
Huisache. New Braunfels. TX 78130