The Hope of the Believer . . . Restoration Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, March 1989 WHEN LIFE BEGINS Cecil
Hook This
is not another essay denouncing the horrible abortion epidemic that has
swept America in our generation. This deals with a doctrinal dilemma. I
am presuming that you believe in and respect the sanctity of human life that
begins at conception. Even though some may question that a new life is
formed at the very moment of conception, they can set no definite time
between conception and birth as the point of it beginning, and few will
contend that it is only at birth that a new human life is initiated. Here
is the doctrinal dilemma. We have taught with much emphasis that a person,
in being born of the water and the Spirit, is not in a newness of life until
baptism. We have contended that life does not begin with faith, but at
baptism. Even though the new birth is analogous to the physical birth, we
have been saying that physical life begins at conception and that spiritual
life begins at birth. A
baby does not suddenly come to life at birth. Birth does not bestow or
initiate life. Birth is the result of life that began at conception. During
gestation there are varying stages of development in reaching the point or
parturition, or birth. Birth is a confirmation of what has been taking place
in the womb and an initiation of the life into a different environment, but
it does not make non-life into life. Because
life begins in the womb does not mean that it will be born. It may be
aborted at any stage of development, or it may be stillborn. Traditionally,
we have not thought of the earliest stages of life as having individuality.
In later stages, miscarriages and stillborns have been given names and
burials. Spiritual
life is initiated when the sinner begins to believe the gospel. With the
first assenting faith, a person becomes a disciple of Christ, a learner.
Being begotten, or conceived, by the gospel, a person's faith should
continue to develop to the stage of obedience. However, it may be aborted at
any point and never be born of the water and the Spirit. As long as the
person is growing in belief, and not disbelieving, there is continued life.
If that person dies on the way to the baptistry, he dies as a disciple, and
there is assurance that God will receive that life. If that learner's faith
is aborted, there can be no hope. Baptism
does not give life. The life begins with the conception. Baptism confirms the changes that have been working in the individual in that life process.
It becomes a public declaration of the saving faith of the disciple and the
Spirit is given as a seal or witness. Baptism is an initiation into a new
environment and relationship. Without baptism the life ends. But baptism
does not initiate the life. If the believer refuses baptism, he refuses the
continuation of his life. In similar manner, the freedom of Israel from
Egypt began and progressed in their faith, their preparation to leave, the
Passover, and their move toward the Red Sea. They could have stopped their
progress and/or turned back on either side of the Red Sea. Traditionally,
we have let Catholic sacramental concepts influence our thinking concerning
baptism. A sacrament is considered to be a specific ritual through which God
pours a special grace into the soul. We have long contended that the grace
of life is poured into our souls at the moment of baptism while we taught
inconsistently at the same time that we are begotten by the word of God.
There can be different stages of life but not two beginnings. Rather
than ruling out the necessity of baptism, my teaching here only modifies its
meaning and importance. Salvation is by faith which is accepting and
obedient. When one reaches a point of disbelieving or disobeying, he no
longer has saving faith. The believer who refuses to be baptized reaches
that point. |