OPPORTUNITIES IN FELLOWSHIP (Part 2)
Robert O. Fife 

We have said that it is the purpose of our fellowship which reveals what we "endorse." We have also said that the "ground" of our fellowship is found in our understanding of the Lordship of Jesus. In light of these two principles, let us examine some of the options open to us.

1.   Cooperation in Campus Ministries.

Scattered over the nation are dozens of campus ministries sponsored by Churches of Christ and Christian Churches. At some universities, such as Purdue, the work sponsored by Christian Churches is highly respected. At others, such as the University of Texas, the work of the Churches of Christ is well established.

Facing the secularism, Marxism, cultism, and even witchcraft on American campuses are our differences of such significance that we ought not join hands? Or must we duplicate campus work for fear that a seeking student might be "misled" into one or other of our separate camps?

2.   Famine Relief

When the Churches of Christ raised money for Polish relief, would it have been forbidden for Christian Churches to participate?

Are Churches of Christ aware of the existence of the International Disaster Emergency Service, Inc.? This institution is sponsored by Christian Churches and their members. It has given hundreds of thousands of dollars in emergency aid throughout the world. The policy of IDES is to work through missionaries of the Restoration Movement who labor in such areas. Could members of the Churches of Christ participate in such work?

3.   Christian Higher Education.

It is a commonplace that there has often been more fellowship among faculties of our schools than is usual among leaders of the local churches. In a time of shrinking dollars available for education, is it unthinkable that we should begin to consider combining some of our educational efforts?

One also thinks of the strategic work being done by such institutions as the Institute for the Study of Christian Origins in Tubingen, West Germany. Sponsored by the European Evangelistic Society, the Institute has engaged in substantive research into Christian origins - a subject certainly important to a people who would restore New Testament Christianity. The Institute has won the respect of the Theological Faculty of the University. It also hosts a gemeinde (congregation) which exists as a free Church of Christ amidst a culture which for centuries has only known State Church. Individual scholars of Churches of Christ in America have studied in the Institute. Would the congregations from which they come think it inappropriate to share in support of this strategic work?

4.   Congregational Cooperation.

But let us "bite the bullet" and speak of the local scene. A few years ago in California, a Church of Christ obtained valuable property near the University of California, Irvine. Christian Churches were also planning to establish a congregation there. The Church of Christ initiated overtures looking toward sharing facilities. This would have released the funds which would have been necessary to purchase a second property for the Christian Church. These funds could then have been used for missions, evangelism, education, or charity. The plan was never consummated, which many of us deeply regretted.

The reverse of the plan in now underway in Lincoln, Nebraska, where a Church of Christ may commence using the facilities of a Christian Church.

Some years ago, Christian Churches of Greater Chicago established the Christian Service Center in a near westside ghetto. My son, Wayne Earl, became the Center's first Director, laboring there for seven years. Near the Center was a storefront Church of Christ. In light of its presence, no effort was made to establish a Christian Church at the Center. Rather, Wayne and his wife Kathleen became members of the storefront congregation. When this congregation lost its lease, the Christian Service Center made its facilities available without charge. But this raises a question:

Even though Black Muslims were penetrating the area, should the Church of Christ have refused associating with a work of Christian Churches until the instrumental music question was settled?

5. Evangelism.

Perhaps it is yet too early to hope that we may someday see a cooperative evangelistic effort on the part of Churches of Christ and Christian Churches. What are the barriers? Lack of acquaintance and trust in many communities. Use or non-use of instruments in services. Finding "safe" persons to lead such endeavors. And, perhaps the most difficult issue would be the possibility that some converts would be led into fellowship with the "wrong" congregations.

But the positive factors exist as well: We believe the same Gospel of the Living Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God. We call sinners to faith in Him, repentance, confession, and immersion for the remission of sins. We believe in the Gift of the Holy Spirit, and the mandate to a Christian life. We all believe in the Church.

Think of the power which could be released if the cities of the land were to see us united in evangelism! To speak commonly, the Enemy wouldn't know what hit him!

Such a prospect may be beyond the life span of many of us. But who knows? There may be a community where the people of our churches have sufficient love, understanding, and courage to join in proclaiming their blessed Messiah. One thing seems sure: If we are taught to "Pray the Lord of the harvest to send forth laborers" into whitened fields, (Mt. 9:38) we must surely have supreme reasons for withholding from Him the strength of a united proclamation of His Good News!

Conclusion.

I have attempted to present the critical character of our division as it is seen from the standpoint of our common conflict with the "principalities and powers" of this age.

I have attempted to show that fellowship in some things does not constitute approval of everything. Rather, it is the purpose of our fellowship in a given task, and the ground of our involvement which determine what we "endorse." Thus, when those who oppose instrumental music and those who use the instrument cooperate for the purpose of feeding the hungry, their cooperation has nothing to do with the instrumental music issue. It only has to do with their common concern for the hungry. Moreover, such cooperation is grounded in this question: In the face of starving millions, what would Jesus have us do?

In the third place, I have suggested some of the many avenues of involvement which may be available to us now or in the future.

That some have condemned, and will continue to condemn, our association together seems inevitable. Our coming to a common mind concerning "the law of inclusion and exclusion" seems all important to these brethren. But some of us have a different perspective.

There happens to be a war on, and we see the enemy for who he is. He is not our brothers in the Churches of Christ or Christian Churches. The Enemy is the one who tempted our Lord in the desert, and who still continues his nefarious work as "the Accuser of our brethren" (Rev. 12:10). From the beginning he is a liar who sows seeds of discord. Even as he leads multitudes into eternal darkness, nothing gives him more demonic glee than to turn brother against brother. While the soldiers of the King are preoccupied with controversy, the Enemy captures strongholds with ease.

Far be it from me to believe the Accuser's lie that my mortal opponent is a fellow believer who would die for Jesus!

I truly believe that our common service will help us find a common mind concerning the differences which have brought us such distress.

Let the trumpet give no uncertain sound. We are prepared to die for the right to speak the Word of God. But the right to be heard is granted by the hearer. As men see our good works they will glorify our Father in heaven (Mt. 5:16). So let us lock our arms together in the wondrous Name of the Servant King. Then, beholding our joyous solidarity in ministry, this generation will be more ready to hear the Good News of eternal salvation.