The
Doe of the Dawn: A Christian World View . . .
THE NATURE OF MAN
May your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete, without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. - 1 Thess. 5:23
In
a philosophical discussion of man there are two terms that are
sometimes used that may strike you as funny words, dichotomy and
trichotomy. The first refers to a division into two parts, the
second to three parts. If one views man the way Paul does in the
above passage, he would be a trichotomist, which may sound like some
kind of a heretic. If one believes that man has but two parts, spirit
and soul being the same thing, he would be a dichotomist, which
sounds no better.
Soul and
spirit may appear to be indistinguishable, even in Scripture, for
Heb. 4:12 refers to the word of God as living and active and sharper
than any two-edged sword, and as “piercing as far as the
division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to
judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” While this is
often made to refer to the Bible, the context suggests that “the
word of God” is God himself or Christ. The following passage
goes on to say “There is no creature hidden from His sight, but
all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we
have to do.” It is therefore the Lord himself whose piercing
insight separates soul and spirit and who knows every thought and
motive.
The
reference to “both joints and marrow” is figurative
language that indicates that the Word penetrates the very innards of
man’s inmost self --- it or he gets inside the genes of soul
and spirit. All thoughts and purposes are fully analyzed and
perfectly classified by the infallible Judge. It is something like
saying “In him we live and move and have our very being”
(Acts 17:28), however man’s nature might be described.
It
is not certain that Paul or any of the New Testament is trichotomist,
or dichotomist either, for in such passages as we have quoted the
writers may be simply accommodating themselves to a view of man that
had been common since the time of the ancient Greek philosophers, as
far back as 500 B.C. The Greeks saw man as a trinity: he has a
material body, which they called soma; he has an animal soul,
pseuche; he has an immortal spirit, pneuma. The latter
is the seat of the higher intellectual and moral faculties, while
pseuche (soul) is the seat of animal life, which includes
passions, instincts, and appetites. The soma (body) is simply
the material house for the other two. These are the same Greek words
used in Heb. 4:12 and I Thess. 5:23.
To
the Greeks, therefore, it is pneuma that separates human kind
from all other creatures. Animals, even plants and insects, have body
and soul. As a thinking creature man is unique. But to the
Greeks this trinitarian view of man was not necessarily religious ---
the spirit did not necessarily come from God. Aristotle, for
instance, saw all this as eternal and uncreated. What is has always
been, and is always changing.
The old
Greek version of man as body, soul, and spirit may, of course, be
right. God may have bequeathed to their sages such wisdom, and it is
understandable that biblical writers would refer to human nature in
such terms, whether precisely correct or not. What 1 Thess. 5:23 and
Heb. 4:12 really teach is that God blesses, knows, and indwells “the
whole man,” describe him as you will.
I
am persuaded that there is no way to dichotomize or trichotomize
human nature. We are not so easily compartmentalized, for what is
soul is also spirit, and what is body may be spiritual as well as
physical. Usually the Bible makes soul and spirit the same, and even
the body is not sheer matter, for it is referred to as “the
temple of the Holy Spirit” and has a destiny beyond the grave,
“the mortal putting on immortality.” Even in this life
the body can be viewed as an extension of the human spirit. Just as
we can properly say “I do not have a spirit, I am
spirit,” we can also say “I do not have a
body, I am body or somos. Your body is also you, not
simply your housing. The interaction of soul (spirit) and body makes
this evident. Bodily hurts often mean spiritual hurts and bodily joys
mean spiritual joys, and conversely. Many noble souls, decimated by
severe maladies, are continually buoyed up by an animate spirit.
The truth
that is vital to us is not how our nature is to be analyzed, but that
we have a Creator who is not far from any of us and who knows every
nook and cranny of our inmost being, however complex it may be.
lt is
also a crucial truth that we stand apart from all other creatures,
being made in the image of God. We only need to study our free
fingers and prehensile thumb, along with the rotation capacity of the
arm, to see that we are different from the animals. Then there is our
erect posture, a larger brain, a more highly organized and intricate
nervous system. It is a very important fact about you that your brain
is about three times larger than the largest anthropoid ape, and that
the greatest development within the skull is the cerebrum, the seat
of the higher mental powers.
But you
are also unique among the creatures in that you have the capacity to
communicate in propositional language, both spoken and written. You
can repeatedly invent, make tools, build machines. You cannot only
travel through the air but into outer space. You are also a social
and political creature who forms cultures, nations, laws,
institutions. You are conscious of yourself and of history, and you
have aesthetic appreciation. You are an ethical creature, capable of
religious refinement.
Henry
Giles was referring to the likes of you when he wrote:
“Man
is greater than a world --- than systems of worlds; there is more
mystery in the union of soul with the body, than in the creation of a
universe.”
It
is also a vital truth that we are of divine origin, regardless of
what science has to say about it. Whatever merits the theory of
evolution may have, we must keep in mind that it does not explain
either the origin of life, the nature of life, or the will to live.
It is only fair to the theory of evolution to recognize that it does
not teach that man descended from the ape. Even if man and the
ape have a common ancestry, which the theory does hold, that does not
preclude a divine origin for man in the dim, distant past.
In a day
when secularism accounts for human nature only in terms of the laws
of physics and chemistry, we as believers must hold forth the
biblical view of man. It is true, as modern science teaches, that we
are part of the physical order of nature, and, like other objects,
are subject to its laws. It is also true that scientific disciplines,
whether sociology, political science, anthropology, or psychology,
have much to teach us about ourselves. A secularistic view of man is
all right insofar as it goes, but it does not go far enough in that
it does not consider “the complete person.” It dares to
reduce the rich qualities of human personality to the functions of
the biological organism. It neglects what is distinctively human
about us.
Along
with God’s revelation that tells us who we are, we have the
crucial witness of our own self-consciousness. These two testimonies,
the Bible and our intuition, sometimes unite in bearing witness to
our divine origin, as in Ps. 8:
“When
I look at the sky, which you have made, at the moon and the stars,
which you set in their places, what is man, that you think of him;
mere man, that you care for him? Yet you made him inferior only to
your-self; you crowned him with glory and honor. You appointed him
ruler over everything you made; you placed him over all creation.”
Here
we have a poet of God contemplating his own nature as a man. This
capacity within itself sets man apart. With the wonders of nature
before him (general revelation) and the word of God in his mind
(special revelation), he ponders his own consciousness of self with
What is man? (subjective revelation), and concludes
that God is the author of it all, a faith based on both reason and
revelation.
We
are alone in this universe only if we choose to be. Anyone can
believe who is willing to take an authentic look up and out and in.
--- the Editor