Jesus
Today . . .
ON
THE NATURE OF FAITH
One
of our Tennessee readers, Phil Elam, sends us a provocative letter
about the nature of faith. Being a reader of the old Millennial
Harbinger, he quotes Dr. Robert Richardson to the effect that the
faith that saves is “a believing on or into Christ.” The
doctor went on to say, “The question, therefore, in regard to
faith, was not, in the beginning, ‘What do you believe? “
which is the eager and sole inquiry of modern religious parties; but
‘In whom do you believe?’”
Phil
notes that our own Church of Christ people are like the “modern
religious parties” that Richardson refers to, for we seem more
concerned with the what of believing than the who of
believing. Richardson was strong on the personal aspect of faith,
showing that it is centered in a person rather than any system of
doctrine. This impresses Phil, who is suspicious that we in Churches
of Christ have “trusted in the accuracy of doctrinal knowledge
instead of Jesus.”
There
is some justification for our Tennessee brother’s concern, for
even when we see that a person has a vibrant faith in Christ (often
more impressive than our own!) we are often eager to “convert”
him to a set of interpretations that could well be called our own.
Being “right” is something more than loyalty to Christ,
or, to put it another way, we tend to equate our system with
loyalty to Christ. We are often guilty, therefore, of moving people
from a Baptist or Methodist view of things to our way of thinking.
Faith in the person of Christ gets lost in the shuffle. It is a
subtle shift from personal faith, which is evident in
Scripture, to a doctrinal faith, which is the life blood of
sectarianism.
It
is foolish for anyone to minimize doctrine, for it is crucial to
Christian growth. It is a matter of putting doctrine in right
perspective, as pointing to the object of our faith rather
than being itself the object of our faith. Even more
important, we must be aware that what we call “doctrine”
is not always the clear statements of Scripture but our own
traditions. We are therefore guilty of a subtle kind of humanism:
basing faith upon our particular interpretation of Scripture. Such
humanism brings the censure of Christ himself upon us: “You err
in that you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God.”
This
caused Jesus to chastise the Pharisees with “You leave the
commandment of God, and hold fast the tradition of men” (Mk.
7:8). The Pharisees consequently honored God with their lips but not
their hearts, which may well be man’s greatest sin --- the
great religious sin! Mk. 7:9 makes it clear that God’s
people may actually reject the Scriptures they claim to honor,
by making too much of their traditions. And traditions are simply
what we make the Scriptures to mean. If the Pharisees could do this
by their doctrine of Corban (by which they negated what the
Scriptures taught them to do for their parents, see Mk. 7:10), we can
do it by an overemphasis upon such externals as the Lord’s
Supper (the day and hour has to be exact!) and baptism (one’s
understanding has to conform to ours!).
In
all this something tragic happens to faith, for it becomes faith in
things, ideas, practices, and even “the right church.” I
recall one sister pleading with me to go through the New Testament
and mark the things that she had to believe. This is a fearful way to
live the Christian life, this struggle to be right about everything.
We must come to see that this is not the faith that Christ
brings us. “You search the scriptures,” our Lord said,
“because you think that in them you have eternal life; and yet
it is they that bear witness of me” (Jn. 5:39). They lost their
Messiah in a Book! They had the Scriptures, but not Jesus. He goes on
to say: you refuse to come to me that you may have life. How
tragic it is for the head to be full and the heart empty!
It
is a crucial error for us to mistake the nature of faith, as the
Pharisees did when they supposed the ultimate was in a Book
(principally their interpretation of that Book) rather than in the
Person that had come down out of heaven. What is faith anyway? Jn.
6:35 provides part of the answer: “Jesus said to them,”
‘I am the bread of life; he who comes to me shall not hunger,
and he who believes in me shall never thirst.’” These are
parallels, coming and believing meaning the same thing. Faith is not
simply the acceptance of certain facts. A recent poll, referred to in
this journal, indicates that a large percentage of the American
people believe the facts of the gospel. That is fine insofar as it
goes, but Jesus means more than that when he talks about faith. How
many of those who accept the facts about Jesus have come to
him in simple trusting faith? In coming to Jesus one has to
leave something else, the world and all its enticements or
perhaps a sectarian system, and that is too dear a price for many.
Until
he comes to Jesus, the only answer there is, man will always hunger
and thirst. Youth, riches, and pleasure will pass him by, leaving him
broken and despondent in his old age. Jesus is his answer, and the
Lord will accept him even at the eleventh hour --- and give him a
full day’s pay in love and mercy! But he must come ---
empty handed, which means that he must leave (reject) what he
has always loved and relied upon, his own stinking resources,
centered in his selfish pride. So believing is coming. Ah, there’s
the rub, for that is one thing the world will not do, and sometimes
the church as well, go to Jesus.
Believing
is also obeying, as Jn. 3:36 indicates: “He who believes in the
Son has eternal life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see
life, but the wrath of God rests upon him.” Here faith and
obedience are used interchangeably. We can only conclude that people
who do not yield themselves to the Lordship of Jesus in trustful
obedience do not really believe in him. Faithing is thus equal to
obeying. --- the Editor