IS “THE BAPTISM OF THE HOLY SPIRIT” SCRIPTURAL?
My
answer to this question is both Yes and No, depending
on what one means by the baptism of the Holy Spirit. I propose to
treat this subject in reference to two common notions.
1. The
baptism of the Holy Spirit is or was indeed real, but it was given
only to the apostles in Acts 2 and the Gentiles in Acts 10, which
were miraculous manifestations. Since its purpose has been realized,
there is no longer any such thing. Some would also include Paul, the
Samaritans in Acts 8, and the disciples in Acts 19 as recipients of
the baptism of the Holy Spirit. But it is argued that once the
apostles died and all those on whom they had laid their hands had
died, there was no longer any way for Holy Spirit baptism to be
given.
2. The
baptism of the Holy Spirit continues to be given to believers today,
albeit not necessarily all believers. This view holds that one may
become a Christian and receive “the gift of the Holy Spirit”
(Acts 2:38) and may sometime afterwards receive the baptism of the
Holy Spirit. Especially among “charismatics” Holy Spirit
baptism is urged upon people who have long since been baptized into
Christ. Thus “receiving the Baptism” is the apex of the
Christian life, and it mayor may not be accompanied by speaking in
tongues.
In this
essay I am questioning both of these positions. The first one is an
unsupportable deduction. That the baptism of the Holy Spirit, however
defined, was given only in certain cases and then abruptly shut off
to future generations hardly satisfies what the Scriptures say on
this subject. My own explanation of the meaning of Holy Spirit
baptism, which follows, will further show why I think this position
is unacceptable.
I
believe the second position is wrong in that it assumes as true that
which the Scriptures do not teach: that once one is baptized into
Christ and becomes a Christian she is yet to be baptized again, of
the Holy Spirit, to receive the fullness of God’s blessings.
It
is ironic that the idea of “baptism of the Holy Spirit”
should be so paramount in some people’s thinking when it occurs
so seldom in Scripture. While the term does appear five times, they
all refer to the same incident, John’s report that while he
baptized with water Jesus would baptize with the Holy Spirit (and
with fire, in some accounts). If there were eight writers of the New
Testament, five of them do not once use the term, and the three who
do are referring to what John said. In all the letters to the
churches, where problems aplenty are dealt with, there is not one
instance of believers being told that they should receive Holy Spirit
baptism. While it is a constant theme in many a pulpit today, and is
made by many the sine qua non of the Christian faith, it holds
no such place in Scripture. The Holy Spirit, of course, does hold
such a place, but not the baptism of the Holy Spirit.
Even in
the letters to the seven churches, where the Lord himself is dealing
with weighty problems, there is no such reference. To one church,
deeply in trouble, he stands at the door and knocks, offering to come
into their hearts if they will only open up. He promises to sit with
them in the most intimate fellowship. All this without the slightest
reference to Holy Spirit baptism, which is usually the frame of
reference in some circles for those seeking such renewal. One would
think that if Paul would eagerly implore his readers to be filled
with the Spirit, to be aglow with the Spirit, and not to quench the
Spirit, he would somewhere speak of what is commonly referred to
these days as “the Baptism.” The Scriptures use no such
language.
But
there is the reference to Jesus baptizing in the Spirit, and we
should seek its meaning. That it could not refer to an actual or real
baptism is evident from the fact that baptism is not only an
immersion but also an emersion. In water baptism one
not only goes into the water but also out of the water.
The word always has this force in Scripture. Even in the washing
(baptism) of pots and pans in Mark 7:4 the articles come out of as
well as into. So if there were a literal baptism in the
Spirit, it would suggest that one exits the Spirit as well as enters
the Spirit, and that would hardly do. An actual Holy Spirit
baptism would hardly make sense, so we conclude that Jesus was using
a metaphor when he said “I baptize you in the Holy Spirit,”
which meant I will give you the Holy Spirit.
There are
several such metaphors of the Spirit that cannot be taken literally.
1 Cor. 12:13 refers to drinking of the Spirit and Eph. 5:18 speaks of
being filled with the Spirit. No one believes that he can actually
drink the Spirit or be filled with it as his lungs would be filled
with air. They are metaphors that stand for receiving or possessing
the Spirit. When Acts 2:4 says “It filled all the house where
they were sitting,” the reference is to the wind or what
appeared to be wind, but it is really another metaphor, pointing to
the Spirit overflowing the room and those in it, which is a dramatic
way of showing that they all received the Holy Spirit, which is what
Jesus promised when he said, “John baptized with water but you,
not many days from now, will be baptized with the Holy Spirit”
(Acts 1:5).
In
Acts 11:15-16 Peter refers back to what happened on Pentecost,
comparing it to what happened to the Gentiles in the home of
Cornelius. He says, “the Holy Spirit fell on them, as on
us at the beginning,” referring to Acts 2. This caused Peter to
remember the Lord’s promise of the baptism of the Holy Spirit.
So fell on and baptized mean the same thing. They were
“baptized in the Spirit” when “The Holy Spirit fell
on them.” Then he says “God gave them the same gift he
gave unto us.” It follows that the falling of the
Spirit, the baptism of the Spirit, and the giving (or
receiving) of the Spirit all refer to the same thing.
There
is reason to conclude that Peter is referring back to the promise of
the gift of the Holy Spirit as found in Acts 2:38-39, for in Acts
11:17 he says God gave them (the Gentiles) the like gift (the
Spirit) that he gave us (referring to those listening to him,
which included those who obeyed Acts 2:38 on that day, as well as the
apostles who received the gift in Acts 2:4). The condition he laid
down for receiving the Spirit was the same for the Gentiles (Acts 10)
and the Jews (Acts 2)— faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. The
apostles (or was it 120 people?) did not receive the Spirit in Acts
2:4 simply because they were apostles, but because they believed.
The Gentiles did not receive the Spirit simply to prove they were
as acceptable as Jews, but because they believed.
I
therefore conclude that all believers receive the Holy Spirit as a
gift, which is what Acts 2:38 promises, and this means the same as
the baptism of the Holy Spirit, which is a metaphor referring to that
promise. It is God’s birthday gift to each of his children.
So
what am I saying? Is Holy Spirit baptism scriptural? Yes,
if one understands it to be the symbol that it is, just as “the
Holy Spirit is come upon you” in Acts 1:8 is a symbol. They
both, like drinking, being filled, fell upon, are metaphorical
references to the great promise of the Messiah, that he would give
the Holy Spirit to those that believe on him.
But
the answer is No, Holy Spirit baptism is not in the Scriptures
if one means something different from “the promised Holy
Spirit” of Eph. 1:13 and “the gift of the Holy Spirit”
in Acts 2:38. When one believes, repents, and is baptized in the name
of Christ, as Acts 2:38 teaches, he or she receives forgiveness of
sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. There is no promise
anywhere in Scripture of another baptism called the baptism of
the Holy Spirit, for Acts 2:38 is the fulfillment of the promise of
Jesus, I will baptize you in the Holy Spirit, which metaphorically is
simply saying, I will give you the Holy Spirit. Since
Pentecost he has made good on that promise, giving the Spirit to
everyone who is baptized into Christ.
If you
have difficulty seeing “I baptize you with the Holy Spirit”
as a metaphor, it will help to remember that Jesus adds “and
with fire,” which completes the metaphor. Contrary to popular
understanding, fire here does not likely refer to hell or judgment,
but, as in the prophets, to the refiner’s fire or the fire of
purification. In the Bible baptism is never used of punishment. Jesus
is referring to the power and consecration that comes through the
indwelling Spirit. Luther caught the sense of the baptizing fire when
he sung: “And each believing soul inspire with thine own pure
and holy fire.” This is the baptism of fire promised to every
believer, such as Paul’s “Be aglow (aflame) with the
Spirit.”
This view
of Holy Spirit baptism recognizes that the Spirit deals with us in
different ways once he dwells within us as the promised gift. He
surely empowered the apostles uniquely. He gave some in Corinth the
gift of tongues and the power to perform miracles. There are
diversity of gifts but the same Spirit. He gives all of us some gift,
and so we are all charismatic or gifted by the Spirit.
This
interpretation harmonizes passages that otherwise may slip by us.
Again and again the New Testament makes it clear that the Spirit is
given to us when we believe. It is “because you
are sons” that the Galatians received the Spirit, or, as Paul
put it, “Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law or
by the hearing of faith?” Rom. 8:9 shows clearly that we are
not Christians if we do not have the Spirit. Acts 5:32 says God gives
the Spirit to those who obey him, and 1 Jn. 3:24 shows that this
precious gift is within every Christian heart, assuring us: “We
know that he lives in us by the Spirit that he has given us.”
It is
confusing when believers are told there is yet a “baptism of
the Holy Spirit” that they are to seek. When we see that this
term is a metaphor referring to the very gift the Christian already
has, it frees him to appropriate more fully what God has given. Paul
suggests in Eph. 5:17 that one should even be controlled by (or made
drunk on) this precious indwelling gift. John assures us that this
gift teaches us, comforts us, and even anoints us.
When
folk tell me, therefore, that they have received the baptism of the
Holy Spirit, perhaps after years of seeking, as they sometimes
put it, I can only conclude that they have now discovered that
wellspring of joy and power that has been at their disposal all
along. It is the same thing as finally inviting Jesus to make his
home with us when he has been standing at the door all along. Just as
Jesus can be at the very door of our hearts and we not realize what
change may be wrought when he is invited in, we can have the Holy
Guest of heaven within us and not realize the resource of power that
is ours. One can live a life of poverty while the beneficiary of a
great fortune and not know it.
Those
who are in Christ Jesus need not suffer such a tragedy, for the peace
and joy of the Holy Spirit, which makes us rich, is for each of
us.—the Editor