OUR CHANGING WORLD |
J.
C. Reed writes from his corner of remote Peten, Guatemala to the
effect that the work is slow and difficult even after ten years of
labor. Thousands are hearing him by radio. His part of Central
America has very poor medical facilities: no psychiatric clinic at
all, and even in the general hospital in the capital they are
understaffed and poorly equipped. They use dishes without washing
them and disposable needles are used over and over, and the doors and
windows go without screens.
Philip
Roseberry, for several years a worker in the Shiloh program in a New
York ghetto, was shot to death on June 30. This was while in the line
of his usual duties in Brooklyn. The motive for the murder is not
known, nor have the killers been apprehended. Philip was an exemplary
young man. He had been working for five years among blacks in the
slums on very limited income, which is all the more reason some of us
would like to help his young widow, who is expecting her first child
soon. I recommend this cause as highly worthy, and those who receive
your money will handle it responsibly. If you want to help, mark it
for Donna Roseberry and make your check to Camp Shiloh, Inc., Box
627, Mendham, New Jersey 07945. It is tax deductible.
The
Bossier Church of Christ in Bossier City, Louisiana had a “Why
I Left” lectureship during the summer. One preacher revealed
why he left the Pentecostal Church, another the Baptist Church,
another the Adventist. One came from Illinois to tell why he left the
Roman Catholics. Others explained why they left the Methodists and
the Adventists. But it was Texans and a Californian left to tell of
their meanderings within the Restoration family. A brother from
Gladewater told why he left “the Non-Bible Class Church”
and one from Tyler spoke of his former days with the Christian
Church. The brother from Long Beach explained “Why I Left the
Institutional Churches of Christ.” That left James W. Adams of
St. Augustine, Texas to do the honors with “Why I Never Left
the Church of Christ.” If you know us well enough, you can tell
which of our “loyal” churches brother Adams was referring
to. At least one person in the audience might have wondered what all
the shifting around meant in terms of one’s relationship to
Jesus.
The
Chronicle
from
Nashville tells of four more Christian Church preachers who have been
“baptized into Christ,” along with two Baptists and a
Church of God man, by the Marvin Bryant ministry. All who believe in
the “one baptism” should repudiate this sectarian
practice. This journal holds that it is sinful to “baptize into
Christ” people who have already been immersed into him. If our
brothers wish to move from one party to another party, we can only
regret that our divisive ways makes such possible, and we have no
right to complain. But to sectarianize the “one immersion”
is a different matter and we deplore that this continues to go on in
the name of “gospel work.”
A
black teacher at Abilene Christian College has been serving as
minister to the Central Church of Christ in Abilene. This is one of
the few instances, if not the only one, among us where a Negro is the
No. 1 minister in a predominately white congregation. The
congregation has only a few black families, as west Texas generally
has a very low percentage of Negroes.
Alex
Solzhenitsyn has reported to the American press, which he files his
complaints against, that there is a spiritual revival going on
throughout Russia. He sees this as most significant, for it threatens
the materialistic philosophy of Communism and could well redirect the
future of the nation. When he was asked what America might gain from
the Russians in the future, his answer was
spiritual
renewal.
The
resurgence is affecting all churches, he says, as well as the whole
of Russian life.
A study between Lutherans and Roman Catholics has resulted in the publication of a 200-page document that questions the claim of the primacy of Peter. It is an ecumenical effort to understand the role of Peter in the New Testament, with special attention given to Matt. 16:18-19. Neither the Protestant nor the Roman Catholic position is defended. The Protestants have neglected to recognize Peter’s prominence while Roman Catholics have assumed him to have authority beyond that of the other apostles, which the study finds unlikely. Eleven scholars spent 45 hours discussing the question. They noticed with interest that Jesus once called Peter Satan. The scholars will continue their study of Peter in the Patristic (church fathers) period of the church and in subsequent history.