“The Churches of Christ Salute You”
For
decades now our people have scribbled it, painted it, embossed it,
lettered it, engraved it, and drawn it on letterheads, calling cards,
newspaper ads, billboards, signs, and bumper stickers.
The
churches of Christ salute you!
That
is in the Bible, of course, Ro. 16:16, and it is talking about us
—not about us in general, but about us
exclusively!
That
happens to be our name, the one we write, print, paint, letter, and
engrave everywhere, and the only name we so honor. We really aren’t
all that interested in
saluting
people,
which means to greet or welcome, but since that is the context in
which “Church of Christ” appears in the scriptures, in
the plural at least, we’ll settle for saluting everybody.
Our
folk have always liked the story of how one of our members was
standing by while a neighbor erected a sign reading
Baptist
Church.
“I’ll
give you ten dollars if you’ll put underneath the words
This
is a Church of Christ,”
he
said to the Baptist, with what we may presume was with an element of
our usual arrogance. “I guess I can’t do that,”
protested the neighbor, “for this is a Baptist Church.”
“Then I’ll give you ten dollars if you’ll put on it
This
is NOT a Church of Christ.”
The
story nearly always brings a laugh. Nothing like being rightly named,
you know. But the story has a sequel these days. The Church of Christ
man was putting up
his
sign
and the Baptist was standing by. “I’ll give you ten
dollars to put under the name
Church
of Christ
the
sentence
This
is a Church of God,”
said
the Baptist, now having his turn at arrogance. When the brother
demurred, the Baptist said, “Then I’ll give you ten
dollars if you’ll put
This
is NOT a Church of God.”
The
fallacy of this kind of in-fighting, as well as these rather naive
references to Ro. 16:16, is to assume that the church is named to
start with, that it has any kind of name at all. If the community of
the New Covenant has any name at all, then it is a denomination,
which is what that term means. It is a contradiction to say that it
is named “The Church of Christ” or “The Church of
God” and also say that it is not a denomination. My position is
that the church of Jesus Christ has no name at all, and so I can also
say it is therefore not a denomination.
Paul
wrote to the Romans in about 57 A. D. from Corinth when he was well
along in his missionary career. He had a vast knowledge of the young
churches scattered over the Mediterranean world, many of which had
begun from his own labors. At the close of the letter he is sending
greetings from some of these churches to those saints in faraway
Rome. “All the churches of Christ send greetings,” he
wrote to them, which reflects his veneration for these brothers that
he longed to see, having not yet met. The faith of the Roman church
had been “proclaimed in all the world,” so it was
appropriate for the other churches to pay their respects. It is a
tender greeting from those struggling communities of saints to the
church in the very heart of imperial Rome, all of them suffering for
their faith together. He is saying something like
All
the congregations of Christ in this region of Corinth, Cenchrea, and
all the province of Achaia, struggling in the faith just as
yourselves, send their love and respect in the Lord.
Such
a greeting was
in
the Lord,
from
one believer to another, just as Paul’s amanuensis did in the
same chapter: “I, Tertius, the writer of this letter, greet you
in the Lord.” It is hardly a greeting to be paraded before the
world on signs and billboards. So, isn’t it a bit theatrical of
us, if not asinine, to use Ro. 16:16 the way we have. It could well
be interpreted as saying:
See,
our name is in the Bible; how about yours?
The
response could well be, from some denominations at least, “Well,
ours is in there more times than yours, so there!” All I can
say to that is that it is a good thing that Paul had Tertius write
“the churches of Christ” or “our name” would
have missed the scriptures completely. He had just written at least
two letters to Corinth (from which he wrote
Romans),
and
in both of them he addressed them as “the church of God,”
and in that correspondence he refers to “church of God”
or “churches of God” four other times. But that one time
in Ro. 16:16 he used “churches of Christ,” which is as
rare as “churches of the saints” in 1 Cor. 14:33. Even
Clement of Rome, writing about 95 A. D., doesn’t help us a bit,
in his
Epistle
to the Corinthians,
which
begins: “The Church of God which sojourns at Rome, to the
Church of God sojourning at Corinth, to them that are called and
sanctified by the will of God, through our Lord Jesus Christ.”
If
we were in search of a
name,
“Church
of God” would be the obvious one, but that is hardly how it
came about. Our pioneers from 1804 onward shunned any name at all for
the church, calling themselves Christians. Disciples, Reformers,
while their neighbors dubbed them “Stoneites,”
“Campbellites,” and even “Reformed Baptists.”
Church
of Christ
was
rarely, but sometimes, used for their congregations. To this day
there stands in Bethany the old brick building that housed the Brush
Run congregation once it moved to Bethany in 1827, and bears in the
stone above the door “Church of Christ.” As the years
passed
Disciples
of Christ
and
Christian
Church
were
the descriptions used by our folk mostly, but sometimes
Church
of Christ.
There
are some references to the old preachers as “Elder in the
Church of Christ.”
When
the “Church of Christ” as we know it today began on
August 17, 1 889 (see our January issue on
The
Birthday of the Church of Christ),
that was the name that had begun to emerge among those who were
breaking away and rejecting the others as brothers, for it was the
name least used by the others. So, once we had our own distinct
faction we had our own distinct name, and we prooftexted our way to
Ro. 16:16 —and finally to all the billboards and cornerstones.
But
the most serious abuse of this scripture is to use it in such a way
as to imply that
we,
our
group of churches and ours alone, are “the churches of Christ”
referred to by the Holy Spirit. The Church of Christ is the Body of
Christ, and it is made up of all those everywhere who are in Jesus,
washed by “the bath of regeneration” and renewed by the
Holy Spirit. Surely many of these are in “Churches of Christ,”
but many are likewise elsewhere. The
Church
of Christ
in
any given area consists of
all
of
God’s children, whether they be found among the sects or where,
and they are my brothers and sisters. They are not my fellow heirs
because they are Baptists or Methodists, but because they believe in
Christ and have been baptized into him just as I have.
To
quote “the churches of Christ salute you” and apply this
to but one group within our tragically divided Christian world is
sectarian and factious. The billboard thing is bizarre and
theatrical. If we want to erect signs welcoming folk to our
assemblies, then we should do so, using “Church of Christ”
as the denominational name that it is, and leaving Ro. 16:16 out of
it. It would be more honest and less sectarian. To be
undenominational in these days of a divided Christendom may be
unrealistic. It may well be our ultimate goal, to be sure, but the
emphasis now should be to be non-sectarian. And we can be
denominational (which we already are —period!) without being
sectarian. —the
Editor