The Church of Christ: Yesterday and Today . . .
THE NATURE OF THE ASSEMBLY
As
we think of the meaning of “going to church” or being
part of an assembled congregation, we must re-member that God never
acts arbitrarily or perfunctorily. All form or ritual that He has
instituted not only has deep meaning, but it is ordained for our
good. Karl Barth has well said that God is for man, and so all
that God does is for man’s enhancement. God wants us to be
happy, mature, and beautiful, and all His work in our behalf is to
this end. He does not exact responses from us to see how near we can
come to measuring up to His demands. He is both too gracious and too
loving to act toward us grudgingly. He wants us for Himself, and like
that father going out to meet the prodigal son, He reaches out with
an incomprehensible love in hopes of making us whole. The assembly,
therefore, must be seen in this light. It is one more expression of
His love, one more means of conforming us into the image of His son.
The
assembly of the saints is not, therefore, simply a response to some
command or the fulfillment of some duty. Almost certainly the
primitive church did not assemble because it thought it had to. It
was an exciting adventure for them, a fellowship of love, and an
experience that they would not consider missing. They did not have to
be begged, threatened, or cajoled into attending. And surely they had
no such notion of having done their duty by gathering with
fellow “believers. It was a natural expression of their
devotion to Christ and their love for their brothers.
It
may sound strange to suggest such in the twentieth century with all
our institutional hang-ups, but there is no indication in scripture
that the saints gathered to worship. Worship was the whole of their
lives. Had you spoken to an early Christian about “going to
worship,” he would not have known what you were talking about.
To them worship was a day and night devotion and dedication to their
Lord. Heb. 12:28 says it well: “The kingdom we are given is
unshakable; let us therefore give thanks to God, and so worship him
as he would be worshipped, with reverence and awe; for our God is a
devouring fire.” There is no more a connection with the
assembly in this passage than there is in Rom. 12:1 which also
refers to the worshipful life: “Therefore, my brothers, I
implore you by God’s mercy to offer your very selves to him: a
living sacrifice, dedicated and fit for his acceptance, the worship
offered by mind and heart.”
There
are therefore no acts of worship. It is not something that begins or
ends with the sound of an organ or the intonation of a clergyman, No
one leads or directs the worship, unless it would be
the God of heaven as He calls us to Jesus through the Gospel. Running
errands for a neighbor is as much worship as partaking of the Lord’s
Supper, or writing a letter to some lonely soul is as much worship as
singing hymns. The apostle seemed to think so at least: “Whatever
you are doing, whether you speak or act, do everything in the name of
the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him”
(Col. 3:17). We are so hamstrung by our traditions as to be shocked
by the suggestion that parents of small children might actually be
more worshipful to stay home with the kids on a Sunday or Wednesday
night and frolic with them rather than drag them to church still
another time. We often frown upon such daring souls, indicating that
they have “missed worship.” The truth is that one who
“misses worship” to do something merciful such as helping
a stranded motorist?) may be rendering a more acceptable service,
which is what worship means, than if he spent that hour sitting
in church.
Come
to think of it, where did we ever get the idea that certain
perfunctory acts constitute worship? I say perfunctory, for they are
usually just that. When we assemble there are those things we always
do, apparently because we’ve always done them. We reach for a
songbook and begin to sing, and ipso facto, just like that,
worship has begun. Moments before back in the vestibule we were
embracing a dear old sister just recovered from surgery, assuring her
of our love and concern. But that wasn’t worship! Now that we
are singing we are worshipping, for that is one of the acts that
constitute worship. It is high time that we learn better than that
sort of folly. Singing is not worship. Giving is not worship. Singing
is singing and giving is giving, both of which, like all else we do,
are to be to the glory of God. Such acts as breaking bread or reading
the scriptures might be referred to as worship (though the Bible
never calls them such), but only if talking, eating, sleeping,
working, making love, going to school, visiting a neighbor, washing
dishes, taking a walk, feeding the dog, and all the rest are called
worship.
It
is our very selves—our bodies minds, spirits—that are
offered to God as a “living sacrifice, dedicated and fit for
his acceptance, the worship offered by mind and heart.” That is
the only worship that the scriptures know anything about. There is no
reason to believe that what takes place in the assembly fits that
standard any more than what happens at work or at school, or in the
kitchen, study, or bedroom. There is therefore no necessary
connection between the nature of the assembly and worship. In fact,
since service gets at the idea of worship as much as any other
concept, it might be more scriptural to associate worship with what
happens at home or at work, or at the hospital or out on the street.
Especially is that the case in our “worship services,”
for there is very little service. For the most part we are
spectators, It may be very true that a lot of us worship God all too
little because of going to church so much. We do all too little
serving at church.
Indeed,
the one passage that speaks so beautifully about our worship of God
is apparently completely divorced from any notion of the assembly:
“Through Jesus, then, let us continually offer up to God the
sacrifice of praise, that is, the tribute of lips which acknowledge
his name, and never forget to show kindness and to share what you
have with others, for such are the sacrifices which God approves”
(Heb. 13:15-16). He is not talking about what we do when we go to
church, but the attitude and behavior of all of life. Let one praise
God as he goes walking or as he drives to work. We “continually”
praise God, he says, whether it be when a baby is born or when one of
the kids gets married. Or even when the barn burns down or fuel and
food prices go up. And notice that if he calls anything worship it is
kindness and generosity—”sacrifices” he calls them.
These we lay at the altar as much as any “five acts” that
we commonly associate with the assembly. The scriptures, of course,
know nothing of any “five acts of worship” either in or
out of the assembly. We do not assemble to worship, but we assemble
as one more expression of “the worship offered by mind and
heart.”
The
Samaritan woman in John 4 had this institutional concept of worship
when she said to Jesus: “Our fathers worshipped on this
mountain, but you Jews say that the temple where God should be
worshipped is in Jerusalem.” She has her modern counterpart in
those who set aside “the sanctuary” in some church
edifices as the place of worship or who define worship in terms of
certain prescribed acts. Jesus’ answer to the woman reveals
that there are no holy places or sanctuaries in the Christian faith
apart from the human heart. He speaks of “the real worshippers”
as those who worship in no place, whether Jerusalem or
Samaria, but who worship in spirit and in truth.
To
worship in spirit means to serve God in sincere devotion, not out of
constraint, law, or tradition. To worship in truth means to honor Him
in the great I Am, the truth of Jesus Christ as the Son of
God. This is a call to life in the Son, not a summons to a prescribed
order of worship, however “right” it might be.
We
can probably speak of “the corporate worship” of the
saints without doing violence to the scriptures, though the term
itself is not a biblical one. There are those things that the saints
are to do together in assembly, and so they are corporate acts. The
term worship becomes objectionable when it is used exclusively of
certain acts being carried out in certain places rather than the
whole of the believer’s life. Yet the believer does those
things in assembly with other believers that take on a different
character because it is the congregated Body of Christ. It is in
order to call this corporate worship or service. We all pray
privately but prayer in the assembly moves at a different level in
that it becomes a corporate function. It was important to Campbell to
restore to the assembly what he called “the prayers of the
congregation,” which is more than someone leading prayer.
Singing may not have been congregational, that is, in unison; but it
was a part of the purpose of the assembly (1 Cor. 14:26),
whether as solos or however, and something different from that
singing that more generally filled the believer’s life (Eph.
5:19, Col. 3:16). And there is something special about reading and
studying the scriptures as the assembled Body. Rev. 1:3 grants a
special blessing to those who read and hear the scriptures in
assembly.
There
is no scriptural evidence that the pooling or collecting of money was
a part of corporate worship, and it is hardly appropriate to the
purpose of the assembly, which we shall deal with shortly. Only the
Lord’s Supper is exclusively related to the assembly. It is the
one corporate act that gives special meaning and honor to the
gathered Body. We may not be able to prove that the Supper was only
on the Lord’s day or Sunday, but we can sustain that it was
always a corporate act. People who break bread in a wedding ceremony
or in mini-meetings apart from the congregation do not act with
scriptural precedence. This is not to say that private observance is
wrong, but it is to say that the character of the Supper may be
misunderstood. The Supper is a community fellowship, a family affair,
a meeting of the Body and the Head in intimate communion. But if this
makes private observance suspect, it also questions a second serving
of the Supper to a handful of the congregation at a later hour, which
is an anomaly in the modern Church of Christ.
The
Supper is a community’s memorial and proclamation, not a
sacrament or some efficacious means of grace. One has not missed some
special personal blessings if he is unavoidedly absent from the
assembly, and so he doesn’t have to “get his”
later. It is the Body that breaks bread as a memorial, so if a member
has to be absent from the assembly he is excused. If he sees the
Supper as a sacrament (that which in itself is a means of grace),
then let him observe it at home or at work or in his car. If a
congregation must have a second serving, then the entire congregation
should again break bread.
If
the nature of the assembly is not, then, to perform certain acts of
worship, what is its nature? The apostle is clear enough on this
point: “All of these must aim at one thing: to build up the
church” (1 Cor.14:26). He is speaking of mutual sharing in
song, teaching, and ecstatic utterance. Throughout 1 Cor. 14 he
describes the assembly as an experience in edifying and encouraging
one another. In verse 3. “When a man prophesies, he is talking
to men, and words have power to build; they stimulate and they
encourage,” and in the next verse he places prophecy over
tongues because it has the power “to build, to stimulate, and
to encourage.” In verse 12: “You are, I know, eager for
gifts of the Spirit, then aspire above all to excel in those which
build up the church,” and in verse 19 he says he chooses to
speak plainly rather than in a tongue “for the benefit of
others as well as myself.” That phrase well summarizes the
nature of the assembly. Then in verse 31 he calls for order in mutual
sharing “so that the whole congregation may receive instruction
and encouragement.”
I
would settle for those last words from Paul as the purpose of the
assembly: that the whole congregation may have instruction and
encouragement. We do not assemble to worship or to perform acts
of devotion. We shut ourselves off from the evil world for a few
precious hours so as to be with Jesus and his Body in assembly in
order to be built up in the holy faith, encouraged to be faithful to
our call, and instructed in the scriptures.
While
the Supper was always observed in assembly, it is probable that there
were assemblies without the Supper. Their purpose was to encourage
and build up one another. As Heb. 10:24-25 puts it: “We ought
to see how each of us may best arouse others to love and active
goodness, not staying away from our meetings, as some do, but rather
encouraging one another, all the more because you see the Day drawing
near.” Heb. 3:13 puts, it “Day by day, while that word
‘Today’ still sounds in your ears, encourage one another,
so that no one of you is made stubborn by the wiles of sin.”
Mutual
edification is the substantial principle in Paul’s epistles,
finding application to the whole of the believer’s life in and
out of the assembly. Rom. 12:4 is an example: “Just as in a
single body there are many limbs and organs, all with different
functions, so all of us, united with Christ, form one body, serving
individually as limbs and organs to one another,” and he goes
on to show that the purpose of our several gifts is for mutual up
building. The grand principle is underscored in Eph. 4:16: “He
is the head and on him the whole body depends. Bonded and knit
together by every constituent joint, the whole frame grows through
the due activity of each part, and builds itself up in love.”
All this makes it evident that the Body is not only to assemble, but that in its assemblies it is to build itself up in love through mutual sharing. We are without scriptural authority when we split the assembly into one speaker and a silent body of listeners. We are also missing the mark when we seek to transform a meeting place into “the sanctuary” and thus achieve “an atmosphere conductive to worship.” And so we have come to equate silence with reverence, thus circumventing that spontaneous ministry that builds, encourages, and informs. It is an atmosphere conducive to “the fellowship of the Spirit,” the sharing of the common life in Jesus, that we must seek to achieve. This is the nature of the assembly.—The Editor