The Travel Letters of Alexander Campbell . . .
CAMPBELL GOES TO NEW YORK
“I
have wished that the burden which I have borne were lessened,”
wrote Alexander Campbell in 1834 a few days after his rigorous 94-day
tour to New York, “that I could retire from the contest and the
incessant toils of mind and body which I have for many years endured
in pleading the Bible claims upon all mankind.”
On
the trip to New York he had delivered 80 public addresses, conversed
in private for hundreds of hours, and traveled 1700 miles amidst the
trying circumstances of an infant nation, He goes on to say:
“Experience, observation, faith, hope and love say, ‘Slacken
not the reins, be not weary in doing good, combat the good combat of
faith, be valiant for the truth, earnestly contend for the faith
formerly delivered to the saints.”
His
extended journeys would sometime render him so exhausted that he
would have to refrain from public discourse for a few days, and
occasionally he was forced to take to his bed in some strange city so
as to nurse a cold or sore throat. On one such occasion he wrote home
to his wife that he was tempted to withdraw from the conflict. using
military symbolism again, but that he would await the time that the
Captain of his salvation would issue an honorable discharge.
He
was accompanied on the New York trip as far as Eastern Virginia by
his own father, Thomas Campbell, and four other friends, who shared
with him in ministering to the communities visited. After a journey
through the Appalachians in the rain the party arrived in
Fredericksburg on Oct. 12, eight days after leaving Bethany in the
West. On the Lord’s day Alexander addressed the disciples on
“the character of the times,” based on Mt. 11, where
Jesus likens his generation to children playing in the market places,
confused in their games, and calling upon his people to repent. That
night he spoke on “the infallible criterion of the original
gospel” to a large audience. Father Campbell and Dr. B. F.
Hall, a Virginia senator and a member of the travel party, also spoke
that day. Discourses lasting as long as they did, you can be sure
that disciples were in assembly most of that day. One lady was
immersed in the Rappahannock river that day, adding to the growing
band of 36 disciples, who had already erected “a very
commodious and neat brick meetinghouse,” costing $2,500.00.
On
to Bowling Green, Va., he addressed the disciples at Antioch on “the
peerless glory of the Head of the Christian Institution,” based
on Col. 1 and 2, in which he contended that every defection from
Christianity arose from erroneous views of the nature of the Messiah.
He was the guest of a Virginia country gentleman, who, Campbell
believed, would have long since “bowed to the authority of the
Eternal King” were it not for “the broils and animosities
of sectarianism.” Here too the disciples had built a commodious
house and had already chosen elders as had Fredericksburg.
He
traveled 14 miles further the next day to Newton (King and Queen),
Va. where he spoke on the two Adam’s, showing what man lost in
the first Adam and gained in the second, drawn from Rom. 5. Here he
also had meetings in homes, one lesson being drawn from Acts 3.
At
Bethesda he spoke on human responsibility, based on Rom. 2, and then
moved on to Richmond, where he stayed for some days, that city being
the center of considerable restoration activity. Seventeen
congregations met together for his meetings, and there were six or
seven others in the area not represented, a total of some 1200
members with 14 public ministers of the word, one of which was Peter
Ainslie.
Campbell
was pleased that these churches were all forced to withdraw
from Baptist churches, and that in no instance did the Reformers, as
the majority, ever cast out the minority. He was also pleased that
they were a people who wonderfully loved each other. His stay in
Richmond resulted in 25 additions, 16 being immersed while nine were
added from the Baptists, which adds to the evidence that our pioneers
did not re-immerse Baptists.
His
traveling companions having left him at Richmond, moving on south,
Campbell remained in the area, addressing several congregations near
the city. He reports at length concerning opposition from a Rev. Eli
Ball, who was upset with his presence in the area. He warned against
reading Campbell’s Harbinger, that “pernicious and
infidel publication,” and urged his people not to hear the man
from Bethany. There was a lot of this in Campbell’s travels,
which was to be expected, being the controversial man that he was. It
may be that Campbell was unduly disturbed by such opposition and paid
too much attention to it. He complains of how Mr. Ball conducted an
opposition meeting of his own, lest his people hear the truth, and
Alexander seemed pleased that he had not a single convert!
He
describes the advocates of reform in Eastern Virginia as representing
the better class of citizens, people of “sterling integrity and
untarnished reputation,” and he believed this an important
reason why the movement was successful in those parts. And yet it
bothered him that comparatively so few were concerned for the ancient
gospel. From the home of Pascoe L. Townes in Amelia county, Virginia,
Nov. 6, 1833, he wrote of how bitter opposition hindered the
multitudes that would otherwise turn to his cause. But went on to
say: “This is, however, the seed time, and it is cold, dry seed
time; moreover, the cutworms are busy underground; but, by the
patience and perseverance of the husbandmen, a good crop may yet be
gathered.”
His
themes in these parts always emphasized “the ancient gospel,”
and yet his subjects were as far reaching as truth itself. From the
latter part of Lk. 24 he would deal with the proper method of reading
and examining the scriptures, urging a special acquaintance with the
Author of the Christian faith as the surest way of understanding the
Bible. He also spoke frequently on how the gospel grants remission of
sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. In a doctor’s home near
Richmond he spoke on the conversion of Cornelius.
Another
favorite theme was “the Christian hope and the duty of
converting the world,” drawn from 1 Pet. 3, where he saw
Christian wives winning their pagan husbands by their good behavior
and “without any debate on the word or any controversy upon the
articles of their belief.” He also observed that each believer
is to be able to give reason for his hope of eternal life (verse 15).
Embarking
on the steamship Patrick Henry, he left Richmond and moved up
the James river to Jamestown, where the pilgrims first settled in
1697, an historical fact he honors in his narrative. He observes that
in leaving Richmond at an early morning hour he witnessed a shower of
meteors, “shooting stars,” illumined the city. Meteors
rained for hours, he reports, creating a scene indescribably
beautiful.
At
Jamestown and Williamsburg he was impressed with the history that
surrounded him, even in 1833. At Jamestown there stood the remains of
the first Christian meetinghouse, and at Williamsburg the walls of
the state’s first capitol stood, as well as William and Mary
College, where, Campbell observes, three presidents were educated. It
was in Williamsburg, “the ancient seat of the colonial
nobility,” that Campbell himself touched history, speaking as
he did in the old monarchical Episcopal church, the most splendid and
ancient in the common-wealth. This Episcopalian hospitality impressed
Campbell, and he contrasted their liberality with the closed door
policy of the Baptists. On this occasion he spoke on “the word
of the Lord which began at Jerusalem.”
At
Yorktown, near where, he notes, Cornwallis surrendered his sword into
the hands of American officers, thus ending the seven years’
war for American independence, he addressed a filled courthouse of
citizens on “the resurrection of Jesus and the end for which
John wrote his memoirs.” He dined in the home of a man named
Wilson, who inhabited a venerable mansion erected by his great-great
grandfather, the walls of which still bore the marks of Cornwallis’
bombs. The man’s grandfather had signed the Declaration of
Independence.
In
Norfolk, Va. he found the cause of reformation only beginning and
faced with such opposition that he decided to move on to Portsmouth
after but a few days. The clergy not only closed Norfolk churches to
him but almost succeeded in denying him the courthouse, where he
spoke over a weekend on the great apostasy (2 Thess. 2 and 2 Tim. 3)
and on the great cloud of witnesses in Heb. 11. A large assembly
heard him and he succeeded, he thought, in disabusing the disciples
of many of the misrepresentations made against them. Campbell was
especially provoked by the clergy that would condemn him and his
efforts while at the same time espousing and plagiarizing his views.
Crossing
the Chesapeake bay on the Columbus, a 450-ton steamer, he
encountered a fierce storm, which must have reminded him of the
shipwreck of his youth as he attempted to sail to America, especially
at midnight when the strong winds and high waves silenced the ship’s
motors, leaving him for the moment stranded at the heart of the
30-mile wide bay.
Arriving
in Baltimore on Nov. 20, Alexander expected to be received warmly by
the pastor of the First Baptist Church, a former acquaintance who had
accepted many of his views and was considered to be almost as
heretical as Campbell. In the meantime, however, the preacher had
received the honor as Clergyman of the Year in the city of Baltimore.
So, as Campbell put it, “the parson triumphed over the man,”
causing the disciples to use Scotti’s Hall instead of the
Baptist Church, where he discoursed for five nights. The first
discourse was calculated to correct the misrepresentations
promulgated by “the parasites of the people,” meaning of
course the local clergy. He went on in other addresses to describe
the beginning of the Christian gospel as contrasted with the
Patriarchal, Jewish, and Pagan systems.
On
Lord’s day he met with the disciples at the Bazaar, since they
as yet had no building of their own, and he was invited by the elders
to address the congregation. He spoke about the Thessalonian church,
showing how they sounded out the word. He observed that holiness and
happiness are greatly promoted by making others happy and holy, that
to be blessed one must bless others.
In
one of the Baltimore addresses he identified what he believed to be
the most common error in all the religions of the world, and that is
the assumption that God is to be appeased by some work on man’s
part, that God is reconciled to man by either physical agony, tears,
blood, sacrifice, or something done or thought. And so he compared
what the religious systems say, “Man by his works must
reconcile God to himself,” with what the Bible says, “God
is by Christ reconciling the world to himself.” Salvation is to
be received, not purchased; to be enjoyed, not merited, by obeying
the gospel.
Alexander
was forever critical of the clergy, believing as he did that they
were largely responsible for the conditions he sought to correct. One
complaint was the pretentious meeting houses with their decorated
pulpits, along with “gorgeous cushions for downy Doctors.”
Among the neglected items was adequate provision for immersing, even
among the Baptists, for in those days there were no baptistries,
however elegant the building. Campbell suggested that those who
believe in immersion should cooperate in establishing a bathhouse in
each major city for the convenience of those who confess Christ. It
should be arranged so that the one who is immersing the candidate
would not himself have to get into the water. This is reminiscent of
the fact that the Campbells, baptizing in the Buffalo at Bethany,
would sometime stand on the root of a tree while immersing.
While
in Baltimore Campbell attended a Jewish synagogue, having a letter of
introduction to one of its prominent members. He was warmly received
but found the experience dreary, for it was all heartless formality.
To him it was a picture of people forsaken of God, slumber and
blindness having fallen upon them.
He
arrived in New York on Nov. 30 by steamboat from Baltimore, and found
to his dismay that there were three small societies “holding
one Lord, one faith, and one immersion” that would not sit down
together around the Lord’s table. So he resolved that to
associate with anyone of them exclusive to the others would be
sectarian. He decided he would spend a Lord’s day with each of
the three, and encourage them to cooperate in his effort to
communicate the ancient gospel to New Yorkers at both Concert and
Tammany halls. He had considerable to say to these small churches
about unity, which eventually led to their unification.
Alexander
enjoyed attacking skepticism and infidelity, for he not only was well
armed with philosophical arguments but also invulnerable to the
cavils leveled against sectarian religion by the skeptics, which his
faith and practice did not obligate him to defend. The New York
skeptics heard him gladly, even as he exposed their premises as
untenable, and afterwards read a letter of appreciation for his
visit. It read in part: “The friendly sentiments also you have
expressed toward skeptics —
appealing to them as men —
as honest men, instead of treating them with contumely, as is
the conduct of the Christian priesthood of New York.
To
the disciples in New York he pled for the unity for which Jesus
prayed, which can never be founded on opinion. Nor can unity be by
the mere force of circumstances and temporary interest. It is not
even by kindred feelings and experiences, for this is a unity resting
on self-love. The only ground of unity, therefore, is the testimony
of the apostles.
Before
leaving New York he assisted in the immersion of ten persons at 7
a.m. on Lord’s day in the East river, at which time he
delivered a discourse on immersion.
He
rested a few days in Philadelphia on his return home due to “extreme
exhaustion from our much speaking in the city of New York,” but
remained in the city through Christmas, addressing large gatherings
in the Universalist church and the Musical Fund Hall, as well as
meeting with the small band of disciples of that city, to which 16
were added by baptism during his stay there. While the Yuletide fires
burned in his home in Bethany, he was discoursing of faith, based on
Heb. 10 and 11, in the city of brotherly love, and listening to solos
in honor of Christmas by “a very celebrated ladies’
preacher of the Methodist society.”
At
one point in his Philadelphia stay, Alexander went to a fashionable
Baptist church to hear a Dr. Brantley, “our warm-hearted and
faithful opponent.” Since the doctor knew he was going to be
present, Alexander was expecting to be admonished for all his errors.
But, alas, the doctor did not show at all, even after the ministers
and deacons sang and prayed three times. “By some singular and
unexpected turn in the hearts of this Regular Baptist congregation,
in their distress they call upon me to preach to them,” he
wrote. “Ascending the consecrated steps and entering the sacred
desk,” as he put it, he read Peter’s speech in Acts 3 and
urged them to repent and be converted that their sins might be
blotted out and that seasons of refreshment from the presence of the
Lord might be sent to them. After the service Alexander returned to
his quarters, musing upon what happened to the doctor! He next
appeared in the columns of his journal, inveighing upon Campbell’s
heresies.
Before
leaving Philadelphia Alexander spoke to an overflow audience in the
Musical Fund Hall on the Christian hope for three and a half hours!
Following
the Delaware as far as Baltimore, where he found still more disciples
immersed since he had been with them, “we turned our face to
the great and mighty West.” He spoke to the saints in
Hagerstown, Md. along the way where three confessed the Lord and were
immersed in a creek, and then took a seat on the stage that carried
him across the mountains. After a sleepless and hazardous jaunt he
arrived back in Bethany.
We presume that Selina recognized him when he walked in the door, but not likely all the children. — the Editor
|
This series will continue through ten installments, and will be part of bound volume for 1970-71, which should be ordered in advance. |