The
Restoration Mind . . .
THE BIBLICAL BASIS OF UNITY
The
blight of division that has plagued the community of God through the
centuries cannot be attributed to any ambiguity on the part of the
Bible. The scriptures are abundantly clear as to what God’s
will is in regard to the unity of his people. It may be that we have
failed the Bible by allowing our divisions to persist, but the Bible
certainly has not failed us. It is unequivocal in the demands it
lays down for the oneness of God’s people, and it is all too
plain in its declarations about division. Let us open the Bible and
see what ground is laid for the unity of believers.
1.
Unity is prayed for by Jesus himself.
It
is a tender scene, the Master praying for men who had difficulty
getting along with each other, who had trouble with their ambitious
pride. He prayed for his disciples that they might be one, and he
included the last one of us in that prayer: “It is not for
these alone that I pray, but for those also who through their words
put their faith in me; may they all be one: as thou, Father, art in
me, and I in thee, so also may they be in us, that the world may
believe that thou didst send me” Jn. 17:20-21).
This
is the only mandate the church needs to get on with the task of
healing its factious wounds. Jesus prayed to the Father that oneness
would be a reality in us. What more do we need to motivate us to take
these issues seriously and to become “a company of concerned
ones” in reference to a divided church.
Jesus’
prayer in our behalf reveals something very important about unity,
that it is a means to something even greater, and not an end in
itself. We are not to be united just to be united, however glorious
that may be. The church is to be united because of the witness it has
to make to the world: that the world may believe that thou didst
send me. A divided church never has and never will have an impact
upon a troubled world. We are to be one so that the world may
be won.
2.
Unit is praised as highly desirable.
“How
good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity,”
says Psa. 133. “It is fragrant as oil poured upon the head and
falling over the beard, Aaron’s beard, when the oil runs down
over the collar of his vestments.” This is to say that unity is
as precious as the anointing of the Lord. The psalm goes on to liken
it to the fallen dew, refreshing and inviting. The imagery
here is especially significant when one realizes how precious oil was
in biblical times and how highly prized the cool moisture of the
fallen dew upon the hot hills of Zion.
Unity
would have the same effect upon our parched and barren world, a world
torn by war, racial strife, pollution and hunger. World leaders now
speak of the unity of mankind as the only hope of survival. If ever
there was a time for the unity of Christians, it is now, for a
divided world has nothing to hear from a divided church.
We
must rise up as one people and lay claim to the promise spoken of by
the psalmist, for we need the refreshing anointment of unity upon our
fevered brows and sagging spirits. Too long have we had divided homes
and broken hearts; too long have we fractured and splintered into a
multiplicity of warring parties; too long have we each gone his own
way, unwilling to sit together in the assembly of the Lord; too long
have debated and quarreled, dividing and subdividing; too long have
we elevated men and their doctrines, allowing them to corral
us into a faction of their own creation; too long have we been ruled
by “editorocracy,” permitting papers to preserve and
solidify our hates and prejudices; too long have we been doctrinaire,
accenting the inconsequential while neglecting the things that matter
most; too long have we been confronting each Other rather than loving
each other.
Now
is the time to lay claim to “the seasons of refreshing from the
presence of the Lord” which is promised in the glorious oneness
of the body of Christ. It is a blessing far too rare among our
people, our party lines being as solidified as they are. What a
precious thing it is to claim every child of God as your brother,
wherever you find him, however weak he may be. Brotherhood is a
relationship created in heaven and sealed with the Holy Spirit, not
something manipulated by party intrigue and preserved by sectarian
loyalty. To claim a man as your brother on the ground that he is a
son of your Father, and to treat him as such, is as sound as the
gates of heaven, and as beautiful. It is like oil upon Aaron’s
beard. May God deliver us from the oppression of having to give a man
the third degree, testing him on all those things that we make
conditions of fellowship, before we can receive him as a brother. We
do well to remember that whatever we make a requirement of one to
enter into our fellowship is our creed. Jot down on a piece of paper
what you demand of a brother before he can be in the fellowship of
your congregation and you’ll have your written creed
instead of an unwritten one.
The
Hebrew word for unity is this psalm is yachad, meaning “at
one,” which helps us to understand the nature of unity. This
occurs when many diverse things become one in purpose and meaning.
Unity in diversity. It happens (or should happen) in marriage, in a
family. The “at one” idea reminds us of atonement or
atonement. Our unity reaches back to the cross, to the atonement,
where God’s grace redeemed us, making us one with him and with
each Other.
3.
Unity is commanded of us.
“I
appeal to you, my brothers, in the name of our lord Jesus Christ:
agree among yourselves, and avoid divisions; be firmly joined in
unity of mind and thought” (1 Co. 1:10) . Surely the apostle
would not require of us to avoid divisions if it were not possible
for us to do so, no more than Jesus would have prayed for a
unity that was impossible. It becomes a matter of whether we desire
to heed Paul’s instructions and to fulfill the lord’s
prayer more than we desire to preserve our parties.
This
passage helps us to see the nature of division as well as unity. The
word here for division means schism, which implies a tear. It
is properly translated dissension, which suggests that sides
were taken, but no actual separation, which would be the word
faction. There were cliques at Corinth, but no open split. The
difference would be the distinction between a tear in a garment and a
piece of the garment that is torn completely away and separated. So
parties (or factions) were in the making at Corinth, due to the
dissension, and Paul’s intention is to put a stop to them. You
notice that he refers to them as “the congregation of God’s
people at Corinth” and as “the body of Christ”
again and again in his correspondence, and he even says, speaking of
the Supper at Corinth, “Because there is one loaf, we, many as
we are, are one body; for we, many as we are, are one loaf, one body”
(1 Co. 10:17). He would never have said that if they were divided
into various parties, each refusing to recognize the other as
brothers, as is the case with us.
Paul
shows us here that the road to division begins with quarreling: “I
have been told, my brothers, by Chloe’s’s people that
there are quarrels among you.” And he makes it clear that this
condition arises when too much confidence is placed in men.. “What
I mean is this: each of you is saying; ‘I am Paul’s man’,
or ‘I am for Apollos’; ‘I follow Cephas’, or
I am Christ’s’.”
In
one of our unity meetings one brother rose to his feet and said, “I
can settle this matter of division here and now. Shoot all the
preachers!” While this may deserve serious consideration, I
hardly think that we should start here and now! But when one looks
back over our long years of division he sees that the pattern has
been what it was at Corinth: fussing and squabbling, and allowing our
Goliaths to fight it out in the arena of public debate, which served
only to polarize us all the more.
Paul’s
language points to the nature of unity in his use of the word
agreement: “Agree among yourselves, and avoid
divisions.” Agreement here could hardly refer to unanimity of
opinion or thinking alike on all matters, for that never has been and
never will be, not even between two people, much less a congregation
made up of people of diverse backgrounds. Placed as it is over
against “avoid divisions,” agreement refers to
that oneness of mind that will not allow dissensions to arise.
Agreeing to be agreeable gets close to the idea. A man and wife,
basking in the unity of their love, do not see eye-to-eye on
everything, but they have agreeable dispositions and allow their
affection for each other to transcend the differences. This is the
force of the words that follow: be firmly joined in unity of mind
and thought. It does not mean that we have to see the millennium
in the same way or have the same attitude about Herald of Truth or
instrumental music, but rather that we are together in our love for
Christ and in dedication to his cause. And we will not let Paul or
Apollos or Cephas keep us from allowing love to hide the many faults
we all have.
4.
Unity is urged upon us.
“Spare
no effort to make fast with bonds of peace the unity which the Spirit
gives” (Eph. 4:3). This passage is most helpful in that it
teaches us that the unity we seek is not ours to gain, but the
Spirit’s to give. It does not come by gatherings like this, nor
by our wisdom and labor, as much as these things may help. Unity,
like love and peace, is a gift of the Spirit.
While
it is true that unity comes through love (“Love binds
everything together in perfect harmony” Col. 2:14), it is a
love that is manifested in our lives through the Holy Spirit. As he
lives within us, his love will be shed abroad in our hearts, making
us one with all those who are like-minded. This is the unity of the
Spirit.
That
there is something for us to do in all this is indicated in Paul’s
words “Spare no effort” or “Give all diligence.”
But notice that it is the bonds of peace that makes fast the
unity of believers. We are to learn the fine art of peacemaking.
There’s another promise we can lay claim to: How blest are
the peacemakers; God shall call them his sons. Peace is something
to be made between persons or within a congregation. It is
something to be waged. It is a victory to be won. The peace that the
Spirit gives us can bind us together in such a precious relationship
that the unity of the Spirit is indeed preserved.
Peace
is such a lovely word. That is why I like the name Irene,
which means peace. We can all be Irenes in the house of God,
radiating that peace that preserves unity. Quite obviously the maker
of peace has to be patient and forbearing, for some people are hard
to take. That is why the apostle prefaces this call for unity with
the words: “Be humble always and gentle, and patient too. Be
forbearing with one another and charitable.” If unity were
based upon conformity, with everyone agreeing on everything and
believing alike, there would be no need for patience and forbearance.
It is the unlovely brother, the complainer, the one who insists on
his own way, the one who is wrong, that the bond of peace encircles
and draws to oneself.
There
are many things that places strains upon the fellowship of the
saints. Careless interpretation of scripture is one of them.
Personality conflicts is another. Behavioral problems and “hang
ups” of all sorts are others. The “brother in error”
is still another, which I presume includes us all in one way or
another. But strains are no real problem if the bond of peace is
sufficiently strong.
5.
Unity is exemplified.
Peter
and Paul are good examples of unity in diversity, and surely that is
the only kind of unity there is, for unity is certainly not
conformity. Look how different these apostles were, even doctrinally.
It went so far that on one occasion Paul rebukes Peter openly. And
Paul’s mission to the Gentiles called for such behavior on
Paul’s part that he was held suspect by his legalistic brethren
in Jerusalem, including Peter. But the bond of peace preserved the
unity and their fellowship was not threatened. They could extend to
each other “the right hand of fellowship” despite the
differences: Now if Paul and Peter could allow love for one another
to transcend their difficulties, can we not manage things like cups,
classes and organs? This means that Paul “fellowshipped a
brother in error,” and I’m afraid that if you are in the
fellowship with anybody at all, it will have to be with a brother in
error. There are no other kind.
What
was true of Peter and Paul was true of congregations like Jerusalem
and Corinth. How different these congregations were and how wrong!
Jerusalem had its racial prejudice while Corinth had its schisms. One
was Jewish, the other Gentile; one conservative, the other liberal.
So vast were the differences that legalists from Jerusalem sought to
undermine Paul’s work at Corinth. Yet they were both the
body of Christ and shared the common life. That, by the way, is
the meaning of fellowship, which is the child of unity. Fellowship is
the sharing of the common life, and some of our problems would be
eased if we used the shared life more and the term fellowship
less.
The
Corinthians shared the common life with the Jerusalem saints through
the bounty that they sent to them by the hands of Paul, and this kind
of relationship is referred to in scripture as fellowship. This
was the purpose of the weekly collections at Corinth. The money was
to be sent to the poor in Judea. Would any of our congregations
today, as different as Corinth and Jerusalem were, take up offerings
for each other? This is one of the highest expressions of the shared
life.
In
his Midsummer Night’s Dream Shakespeare caught the
significance of this kind of unity.
So we grew together
Like to a double cherry, seeming parted,
But yet a union in partition;
Two lovely berries moulded in one stem:
So, with two seeming bodies, but one heart,
Two of the first, like coats of heraldry,
Due
but to one, and crowned with one crest.
It
is indeed “a union in partition,” for in spite of race,
nationality, sex, age, education, social standing, and all other
partitions that wall men off from each other, we are all one in
Jesus. It was a high and wide partition that separated Peter and
Paul, Jerusalem and Corinth, but it was shattered by him who breaks
down all barriers through his sacrifice on the cross.
Shakespeare
saw too that unity is like berries “moulded in one stem,”
which is certainly the nature of Christian unity. We are one, not
because we are bound to each other, but because we are together
moulded into Christ. The members of our body are related to each
other only because of their common relationship to our head. So we
are all members together in the body of Christ. This is why all
who are in Christ are in the fellowship of the Spirit and are for
this reason brothers together. It is not a matter of how many points
of doctrine we see alike, but whether we bear the same relationship
to Jesus.
6.
Division, the opposite of unity, is declared sinful.
“Anyone
can see the kind of behavior that belongs to the lower nature:
fornication, impurity, and indecency; idolatry and sorcery; quarrels,
a contentious temper, envy, fits of rage, selfish ambitions,
dissensions (divisions), and jealousies; drinking bouts, orgies, and
the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who behave
in such ways will never inherit the kingdom of God” (Gal.
5:19-21).
All of us in our divided brotherhood need to take a long look at this passage so that we can be jarred by the company that division keeps. Division is of the flesh,. partyism is carnal. Our divisive ways are sinful. There is no other way to cut it. Perhaps we did not create these parties; perhaps we were born into them and they are our unhappy heritage. But the fact is that we are, in the main, too unconcerned about the matter. We are guilty of tolerating and preserving the sins of our fathers. Once we see the ugliness and sinfulness of parry intrigue, we will be moved to do something. What Jesus prayed for, what the Spirit urges upon us, what the early congregations exemplified, we can surely realize in our own generation. It is largely a matter of getting our “want to” fixed, and once the desire is there, the Spirit will make it a reality. — Delivered at Restoration Workshop, Los Gatos, Ca., March 27, by the editor.