| READERS' EXCHANGE |
Pat
Boone’s New Song
Pat Boone’s “New Song” stirs
my curiosity. I have long been dissatisfied with our attempts to bury
the Holy Spirit on the Isle of Patmos along with the apostle
John.—Massachusetts
Let
My People Go!
I appreciate your stand on opinion and doctrine,
on instrumental music, and on Pat Boone and his experience in the
Holy Spirit. I still have much study to do on these and other
subjects, but until I do, I want to love all of my brethren as much
as I can. Already I am beginning to see that I don’t have to
agree with you on every little jot and tittle before I can love
you.—Abilene
We praise the Lord for your paper and especially
for the latest issue containing Pat Boone’s story. But the
first article on “The New Covenant” needs to be spread
abroad. Our elders and preachers, as well as all the rest of us, need
to read and understand what you are saying.—California
If you cannot send us extra copies of Pat
Boone’s “My Search for Dynamic Reality” we would
like to secure permission to reprint it.—New Mexico
Your articles in the Restoration Review are
tremendous. Praise God! I am so glad that God is not leaving out the
people in the Church of Christ in His outpouring of the Holy Spirit
at this crucial time! We need Jesus so badly!—California
Please accept my appreciation and thanksgiving
for your splendid little paper. It puts emphasis where I believe it
is most needed: on true Christian love and the much neglected great
Holy Spirit. However fine may be our rhetoric, or however meticulous
our doctrinal details, we are still nothing without the absolute of
love. May God bless and further your noble and needed work of
reconciliation. “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be
called the children of God.” Matt. 5:9.—Ohio
I have borrowed and read the May issue in which
Pat Boone’s article “My Search for Dynamic Reality”
appeared. I have some friends who do not believe that Pat really has
experienced the talking in tongues, and I’d like some copies to
give some of them. Pat Boone baptized our oldest daughter, and she
has converted her husband to the “one way.” She can’t
believe that Pat is sincere in what he now feels.—Tennessee
Brother Pat’s article is a beautiful
testimony to his courage and love. I pray only that our brethren will
see this love and share it rather than stumble over something with
which they may disagree.—Chicago
I am really thrilled with your attitude, your
willingness to give the other guy the benefit of the doubt (as Christ
gave us the benefit of the certainty!), and your “open-arm”
approach to fellowship... More and more I have the feeling that the
Lord is trying to dissolve the barriers between people and bring us
together in “the unity of the Spirit.”—Pat Boone
Preaching
at the Vatican
An
interesting news item tells of how one of our Church of Christ
ministers in Rome stood up one day and preached in the Vatican. This
was not at a public service as such, but to the crowd milling about
in the vast expanses of St. Peter’s cathedral, many of them no
doubt tourists. The reporter to the Firm Foundation tells us
that the sermon was longer than Paul’s address on Mars Hill and
that it was “the pure simple truth.” It also condemned
some of the errors of Romanism, all the way from its gross claims
about Mary to its bachelor bishops. The pope was also identified as
the man of sin in 2 Thess. 2.
The
reactions to this unusual incident are interesting. An American
tourist, apparently a non-Roman Catholic, chided the preacher for his
behavior, asking him if he had permission to do such a thing. “How
would you like a priest coming into your place of worship to preach
against your religion?,” asked the tourist.
A
Baptist in the crowd approached the preacher, commending him for his
courage and offering a donation.
Most
noteworthy about the report was the absence of any reaction on the
part of the officials or Vatican police. There was apparently no
reaction from any Roman Catholic source. Did they allow the man to
have his say, and to walk out unmolested? Was it that they simply did
not care or paid no attention? It must have caused not even a ripple
in the spacious chambers of St. Peter’s.
But
what the Vatican ignored was to the preacher no doubt significant. He
was once “a shy, reserved and timid soul,” the report
reveals, but now his reputation for boldness is assured and he has
made the columns of the Firm Foundation. And he can tell his
grandchildren that he once preached in St. Peter’s.
Socrates
would insist that unless there is also wisdom there can be no real
courage. However I would take no honor from our brother, especially
since I’ve pulled a few tricks like that myself; and it could
well have taken something most of us do not have to get up in St.
Peter’s and speak “the pure simple truth.” But how
disconcerting it must be to be ignored. When I did things like that,
they threw rocks at me and hauled me off to jail.
As
I read this report I asked myself how it would look to a gracious,
intelligent Roman Catholic leader. He would probably understand the
conduct of the young preacher well enough, allowing that religious
zeal sometimes takes this form. He would grant the sincerity of the
man and perhaps insist that he should be allowed to have his say,
even in St. Peter’s, so long as he does not become a nuisance.
But I think he would be puzzled over the fact that the report would
be published in our church press. If they would ignore it, why
couldn’t we? What is so significant about it as to merit a full
page write-up in a weekly organ?
And
if our Roman Catholic friend were as gracious as many are he would be
more critical of one of his own priests who would do something like
that in the rotund corridors of Moody Coliseum during an ACC
lectureship.
And of course our reaction would be the same as theirs was in Rome. We would pay no attention to him at all!