VIGNETTES
ROBERT
MEYERS
Touch
and Learn
It
is Sunday morning. My little son Devon sits in church beside Winfred,
a black boy his own age. Each is quietly busy with whatever tiny
distractions will let them ignore me, a perfectly reasonable response
to words not aimed at them.
Suddenly
Devon looks over at Winfred’s head with its wiry,
tightly-curled hair. Passive speculation lasts only a few seconds
before he reaches his hand up and touches it down gently on top of
the black boy’s head. His fingers rub the wiry little whorls,
feeding on this strange difference. Then, without a word, he brings
his hand back to himself.
Winfred
accepts instantly the simple, warm curiosity that began this game.
His small black hand goes up to my son’s straight silky-blond
hair. With visible delight he tastes with his fingers this
peculiarity of his friend’s and then, without a word, he too
returns his hand to its former business.
Neither
says a word then or later. The incident is closed, each has found
what he sought, and for them there was nothing strange about their
candid need to touch and learn. But for those of us who saw it that
day it seemed a minuscule parable of the way we might reach out in
trusting honesty to bridge the gaps that separate us.
Living
Death
I
read somewhere of a discreet female crab named the Hapalocarcinus
marsupialis who counters the hazards of sea life by taking up
residence when very young in the fork of two coral branches. These
gradually form a cage around her so that nothing predatory can get at
her. She comes to be completely enclosed, absolutely safe, with only
the total loss of freedom ever to move again as the price she pays.
This
young crab symbolizes the philosophy some have in their religious
life. They cooperate with others to build slowly and patiently a
rock-hard prison around their minds, excluding sympathetic
consideration of any ideas which contradict those they have decided
are true. They boast of being protected from the dangerous “world”,
never realizing that they have condemned themselves to a kind of
living death.
New Source of Power
One Wednesday evening we had a young woman talk to us
of her baptism in the Holy Spirit and her experiences with speaking
in tongues. A former student of mine, her manner was poised and
gracious. She talked calmly of having spoken in tongues once or more
each day for over a year and seemed radiantly certain that the
experience had brought new power into her life.
When
one of our ladies asked if she would pray in tongues she replied that
although she did not wish to do so as a “parlor trick”,
she would do so if we had a definite request. Another lady asked for
prayer for a black girl we had tried futilely to help, and the young
woman consented to pray.
She
began in English and spoke a lovely prayer in behalf of the girl
named. Then she began, without perceptible change in voice modulation
or emotion, to speak sounds which were not comprehensible to us
although they were both melodious and rhythmical. There was nothing
in the least theatrical about her prayer. It continued to have
dignity.
She
claimed that her first tongue-speaking was in Latin, a language she
had not learned. A college teacher, she had been translated by Latin
teachers who heard her. She did not know what language she was now
speaking, but she claimed to understand in her own heart what she was
saying.
She
claimed some extraordinary cures were being wrought through the power
of the Holy Spirit, adding that some were even being raised from the
dead in “foreign lands, where people are less prejudiced.”
I
felt that a skeptic could reply: “And where people are more
superstitious, less scientifically oriented, and less easily checked
out by adequate methods of verification.” But a skeptic also
would have had to deal with her confidence and her winning humility
as she told us joyously of the power that had come into her life.
Our
guest was neither stupid nor hypocritical. Whether she had simply
looked for something new and helpful until she half-created it, I do
not know. I came away from the evening with great sympathy for her,
but with the persistent conviction that my mind is one with Paul’s
who, though he would not have forbidden her, preferred to speak five
words with his understanding than ten thousand in an unknown tongue.
What perhaps remained longest in our minds about the evening was the
radiant joy this young woman felt about her devotion to the Lord. If
we were not sure that her specific experience was the way for us, we
were at least convinced anew of the drabness of much that passes for
Christian commitment. Churches are full of people who are not
satisfied and who want to find some new source of power. That is a
fact which no single one of us can dare to forget.
To
Young Preachers
I
sometimes remember, with a slight shudder, the early age at which I
began to preach. Fifteen years old, armed with some two hundred
memorized proof texts and a half-dozen sermon outline books, I
assaulted my elders each Sunday morning with perfect confidence that
while I might be young the Truth was eternal, and I had it.
My
transportation was a Model A Ford with maroon body and orange wheels
(I had exquisite color sense). It must have been some sight, it and
I, traveling down the graveled, wash-boardy road to the small
schoolhouse in Ryal, Oklahoma. And when I got there, how had I nerve
enough to speak? What had I to say except second-hand messages and
untested truths? Nothing, really, but I was blissfully ignorant of
the fact.
Remembering
those days, I dedicate to all young preachers this passage from
Anthony Trollope’s fine nineteenth century novel, Barchester
Towers:
“It often surprises us that very young men can muster courage
to preach for the first time to a strange congregation. Men who are
as yet but little more than boys, who have but just left, what indeed
we may not call a school, but a seminary intended for their tuition
as scholars, whose thoughts have been mostly of boating, cricketing,
and wine parties, ascend a rostrum high above the heads of the
submissive crowd, not that they may read God’s word to those
below, but that they may preach their own word for the edification of
their hearers.
“It seems strange to us that they are not
stricken dumb by the new and awful solemnity of their position. ‘How
am I, just turned twenty-three, who have never yet passed ten
thoughtful days since the power of thought first came to me, how am I
to instruct these grey beards, who with the weary thinking of so many
years have approached so near the grave? Can I teach them their duty?
Can I explain to them that which I so imperfectly understand, that
which years of study may have made so plain to them? Has my newly
acquired privilege, as one of God’s ministers, imparted to me
as yet any fitness for the wonderful work of a preacher’?”
Trollope
thinks twenty-three too early! Many of my friends began at sixteen
and eighteen. How insouciant and sure we were as we went to our
“appointments”. I suspect that these friends of the past,
wherever they are now, join me in hoping that the gracious Lord will
forgive us for all the times we were so confidently ignorant, and for
the loud noises we made in the mistaken notion that we were speaking
something profound.
The
“Pure Church”
In
a recent Christian Chronicle note Dow Merritt, a marvelous old
Christian gentleman who has sacrificed much in order to live our his
convictions, says something interesting about the church in Africa as
contrasted with the church in America (he means the Church of
Christ). He says that he and his wife “have decided that you
may have to go to Africa to find the pure church after a while.”
This
“pure church” idea has been a will-o’-the-wisp for
several generations, leading churchmen through some mighty boggy
ground. There never was a “pure church”, except in the
mind of God. The moment the idea gets embodied in men it stops being
pure. Mr. Merritt finds the church in America too materialistic and
unsociable, so it isn’t hard to see why the church in Africa is
superior to it. His wife believes that the Lord has taken his church
to Africa and that the Africans will have to come over here and
evangelize America by and by.
We
shall probably all be happier if we accept the conditions under which
churches must exist. Composed of human beings, they will always be.
Instead of concentrating on “purifying” the church (which
inevitably takes the form of concern with its music, its hierarchy,
its interpretations), it might be preferable to learn how to love its
widely varied individuals into greater maturity, recognizing all the
while that none of us ever escape entirely the limiting matrixes in
which we were born and reared.
Middle
East at Last
And
while the Chronicle is still in mind, how is this lead
sentence from a news story printed there: “Thirty-seven people
were baptized in the first gospel meeting held in the Middle East
since the time of the Apostles?”
The
Middle East is a pretty big chunk of real estate. Nineteen hundred
years is a pretty long time. The Methodists and Baptists and
Presbyterians have been preaching in various parts of the Middle East
for the last couple of hundred years. Before them, at various times,
there were others who claimed to be Christians and who told the story
of Christ on Middle East soil.
But
no matter. The Church of Christ had never been on that territory with
a gospel meeting until a few months ago, so the gospel had not been
preached there since the Apostles went out from the Fifth and Main
Street Church of Christ in Jerusalem. Let us hope that the people of
the Middle East are properly appreciative of our having gotten, at
long last, to them.