ANOTHER LOYAL CHURCH FOR MY
HOMETOWN
Denton
has been our home for eight years now, and it is a pleasant little
city, lying 35 miles north of Dallas-Ft. Worth. While it is unique in
being the home of two state universities, it is rather typical in
reference to its representation of congregations of the Restoration
Movement. Our Pioneer preachers made their way to Denton a century
ago, and while that famous Texas bandit, Sam Bass, was robbing banks
and trains in these parts, they were immersing converts and planting
churches. So the Christian Church and Churches of Christ have a long
and respectable history for this youthful section of our country.
Back
in the 1870’s our Movement in this part of Texas was united, as
it was all the way back to Virginia and Kentucky where it began. But
the ugly story of division came to Denton as well as to every other
city, so that today we witness to the same factional pattern that is
evident everywhere our people are known. The First Christian Church
(Disciples) and the Boliver St. Church of Christ are the oldest of
our congregations, and their history goes back well into last
century. We also have a non-class congregation, a premillennial
congregation, a non-cooperative (anti-Herald of Truth) congregation,
and two other mainline Churches of Christ.
Now
however the premill group should be removed from the list, for their
number grew gradually smaller, and they at last sold out to the
non-cooperative group. The switch seemed strange: it was still a
Church of Christ, same building, and some of the same folk kept
coming even after it was under new management. One Sunday it was
premill, with all the implications that has, and the next Sunday it
was antiHearld of Truth with all the implications that has! One
brother, who is premill but still sitting in his same pew as before,
was explaining to me how the signing of a contract transformed the
place into a different kind of Church of Christ. “They don’t
believe in orphanages,” he had gathered from what he had been
hearing!
There
is of course more involved than that, but men who struggle all week
to make a living had just as soon that their world on Sunday be kept
uncomplicated. It is too bad that their Sundays cannot be truly
heartwarming, soulgrowing experiences. But many of them learn to
their sorrow that the gravest issue in our divided state is to
establish and preserve our parties. And that is seldom edifying to
the soul.
It
is needless to say that these congregations have nothing to do with
each other, except for token recognition between the mainliners. Each
party is the loyal one, and insofar as it is concerned, it is the
only Church of Christ in Denton. It is unfair to include the premills
in this, for during their years in Denton they made several overtures
toward the others, even to conducting a unity meeting one year. Nor
does the First Christian Church practice exclusivism, though like
most Disciples they make no special effort to communicate with their
fellow heirs of the Restoration Movement.
But
within our own Church of Christ ranks the divisions are bitter and
deep. One prominent “anti” minister was once with the
Boliver Street congregation, at which time he was greatly loved and
appreciated. He returned recently to condua meetings for the new
“anti” group, and, despite notices in the press of his
presence, only two old sisters from the big church he once ministered
to came out to hear him. In visiting with him at that time and since
it was evident to me that he was a terribly grieved and disturbed
man, his life’s work shattered by strife. He told me that the
death of loved ones in his immediate family had not effected him as
the loveless experiences he had been through. He was a sad spectacle
to behold, and yet all he had done stemmed from a sincere heart, a
burnconviction that he was right and the others wrong.
Another
of our ministers here in Denton told me of how he tried to approach
another preacher who had branded him and his group as factious.
Calling at his home in an effort to be brotherly, he could not get
the preacher to answer the doorbell. “He knew it was me,”
he insisted, with a trace of glee of being able to tell such a
damaging tale.
These
accounts indicate that I manage to keep lines of communication open
with all these groups in Denton. I am the only one in town that I
know of who can and does circulate among them all and acknowledge all
as my brothers. I consider none only half-brothers. Nor do I think in
terms of “full fellowship” or “partial fellowship.”
I disagree with them all but love them nonetheless. And they can talk
with me though not with each other!
After
telling all this it would appear unreal to tell of still another
loyal church coming to my hometown. But there is one prominent
wing of our Movement that I did not include in the account above, and
I was well aware of their absence in Denton, but now they have moved
in and swelled our list of true churches. I refer to the Independent
Christian Church.
I
first read of the move into Denton in one of the Independent papers,
that a certain brother who was evangelizing in Texas was to plant a
faithful congregation in Denton. Then I read of it in the local paper
and received personal invitations to its opening service, which was
to be in the form of a regional rally, with folk coming from far and
near. The city auditorium was rented for the grand opening and the
state evangelist was to preach. So I was on hand to welcome to my
hometown still another loyal church. I was resigned to the fact that
one more probaHy wouldn’t hurt anything. More importantly they
too are my brothers and I wanted to be with them.
But
I was disappointed in what I saw and heard that night, and I feel
constrained to offer my protest to the Independents that read this
journal.
It
was undoubtedly the most disgraceful display of sectarian bigotry
that I have witnessed in many a day. I was ashamed of them as my
brothers and regretted that such a manifestation of self-righteous
pharisaism should be associated with the Restoration Movement.
There
is consolation in the fact that many Independents are not as
sectarian as was the preacher on this occasion, and some of them that
I know personally would have objected as much as I did.
By
listening to what was said one would suppose that Denton, Texas had
all this time been destitute of the gospel, that no gospel ministers
reside here, and that we were bereft of both Christians and Christian
churches. By replacing some remote village in Afghanistan for
“Denton” in what was said, it might have passed as a
rahrah speech in behalf of foreign missions. But the speaker made it
unmistakably clear that to him Denton was a destitute field in need
of evangelization, as much as Macedonia ever was to the apostle Paul.
Despite
our factious ways I was hardly prepared for what I heard. The Lord
wants a church in Denton!, the students in this city need a church
where they can worship in truth!, we must sacrifice to establish the
Lord’s cause in Denton!, a city with two universities should
not be without a church! On and on it went. The “Denton
Christian Church” became a reality that night, and, from what
had been said, one could conclude that at that moment Denton became a
part of the history of Christianity.
I
listened carefully for it, but there was not the slightest reference
to any of the six congregations of the Restoration Movement already
in Denton, some of them planted by gospel preachers who had gone on
to their reward long before the speaker was born. It was indeed a
momentous occasion at municipal auditorium. The gospel had at last
reached Denton!
It
was a bitter experience listening to all that, but my resentment was
eased by memories of my own youthful “zeal without knowledge,”
and I left the place feeling sorry for all of us, including myself.
In fairness to the facts, however, I must add that the speaker that
night cannot be excused on the grounds of youth.
But
I must say the same thing about myself, if not now then certainly in
earlier years. I have pitched tent in many a town with no doubt
whatever that my first sermon under the canvass was the first the
people had heard of the gospel. And now I wonder if even I on such
occasions really proclaimed the gospel or was it an effort to add one
more party to those already there? What a miserable job we have done
in “uniting the Christians in all the sects,” which was
the stated purpose of our pioneers.
My
complaint is not that the Independents have come to town, for they
have as much right here as the rest of us, and it may well be that
they can make an important contribution to the Christian cause. But
why cannot the coming be more irenic and with an appreciation of what
has already been done for Christ? It ought to be enough for the
Independents to believe that they have a significant contribution to
make, that they have emphases to bear witness to that may be
neglected by existing congregations? Must it all be so earthshaking
that both wisdom and the gospel will perish if they do not make their
entrance?
It
would have been gracious if the speaker could have said: “We
are well aware that the gospel was brought to Denton a century ago by
our pioneers, and that their work has been carried on through the
years, so that now we have some six congregations of our Movement in
this city. We rejoice in all the good that these our brethren have
done and are doing. We are sorry that the work has to be done in such
a divisive state, but this is the case everywhere. Why do we now
come, adding one more name to the roster of Restoration churches? We
believe we have a witness to make to this city. We believe that our
wing of the brotherhood has preserved some of the truths that are
being neglected by others. We want to emphasize some things that
others are minimizing. We believe God wants us here to do this,
within a context of love and cooperation with all our brethren in
this city who love and honor the Christ as we do.
In
fairness to the Independents it must be admitted that all of our
parries carry out their missions in about the same way as they came
to Denton. In fact this is the second “loyal” church that
I have helped welcome to town since I’ve been here! But our
several wrongs do not add up to a right. We just must stop our
devisive ways. Stopping starts in the heart, in the way we feel
toward each other. The Christ will help us, if we really want to give
up our sectarianism. And that’s the question. Do we really
want to give up our party religion?
In view of what is said here about the attitude on the parr of some Independents, the following statement from an Independent preacher might be especially appropriate.—the Editor