THE UNDERGROUND CHURCH OF CHRIST
That
a substantial number of Christians in various parts of the world have
gone underground in their efforts to bear witness to their faith is a
generally known fact. Thousands of them are behind the Iron Curtain,
risking their lives in carrying on illegal religious activity. A
recent book, God’s Smuggler, is a thrilling account of
how thousands of Bibles have been smuggled into countries where it is
unlawful for them to circulate.
A
recent issue of The Saturday Evening Post has an article
entitled “The Underground Church,” which is principally a
report of an underground movement among Roman Catholics. The article
claims that there are some 2,000 to 3,000 underground groups now at
work in the United States, including 30 in Los Angeles and dozens in
Chicago. These are gatherings outside of, and usually without the
blessings of or even the knowledge of, the institutional church.
Young priests, dressed in sport clothes, serve Mass in hotel rooms
and private homes, substituting breakfast rolls for unleavened bread.
The services are private in that they are not announced and illegal
in that they violate canon law, and they take the form of mutual
ministry, with the priest and parishoners engaging in dialogue on
current issues.
It
is sufficiently extensive among the Protestants as to cause Malcolm
Boyd to write a book on The Underground Church, in which he
explains the movement as an effort to make the church “a
community of servant-hood in the midst of the world’s
concerns.” He says it is because the established church has
been content to be “the chaplain of the status quo”
that the underground church has emerged. He sees it as a rebellion
against a labyrinth of manmade legalisms and an institution that
cannot be questioned.
Even
with this going on around us, we of the Churches of Christ may still
be surprised to learn that it is happening among us too. For the most
part it is still a subtle and unstructured development, and yet it
has the essential features (plus a few others) of other underground
movements.
Much
of it is yet in its embryonic stage, taking the form of cell groups
within well-established congregations. It is in prayer and study
groups that the underground is emerging. In many of the larger
congregations there is cellular activity, which forms more or less
spontaneously, which becomes what may be called a second church. It
is usually a case of the more concerned, more spiritual ones being
drawn together by their common interests. The minister himself is
sometimes involved, being a rather status quo preacher in the
pulpit, but a deeper, freer, more daring individual within the cells.
The underground members understand that he can go only so far, and
they excuse his mainline orthodoxy in the pulpit on the grounds that
if he went too far he would only destroy his chances to liberate the
congregation.
Underground
elements are as prevalent in some Sunday School classes as anywhere.
These are often independent cells within a huge congregation,
enjoying a freedom that enables them to do surprising things, such as
reading from Restoration Review and debating the issues raised
in Voices of Concern. There have been denunciations of Church
of Christism and a call for renewal in these Sunday School classes
that would rival what any of us have been saying. Occasionally the
preacher has a rather select group, an underground element, in one of
these classes, at which time he is so different from the man who
occupies the pulpit that people might suppose they have two different
ministers. Somehow he gets by with saying unorthodox things in the
class that he could never say in the pulpit and keep his job. Either
the cell doesn’t tell on him or there is something about a room
in the southeast corner of the basement that allows for more
equivocation than does the sacred desk in the auditorium. If a man is
given to relatives, he knows to forget them and to speak in absolutes
when he enters a Church of Christ pulpit.
It
may be a psychological oddity, but it seems that the farther one is
from the pulpit the more latitude he has. This is why our best
ministry may be on an outing with the young people or a gathering in
a home. We even show more courtesy and brotherliness in such
environments. Dialogue with premills or Christian Church folk comes
more easily when we escape from our real estate. Many a time have I
been with preaching brethren in private meetings who tendered to me a
most loving and cordial reception, only to see them become a Mr. Hyde
towards me once we reached the Holy of Holies.
Campus
Evangelism
One
important expression of the underground Church of Christ is the
Campus Evangelism, conducted by the Lubbock Church of Christ. While
its efforts are directed toward winning the college campus, which it
will not even begin to do until it becomes less Church of Christlike,
it is enjoying success in winning and holding many of the youth of
the Church of Christ. No less than 12,000 of them assembled in Dallas
recently, and one can be sure that not even a tithing of that number
would have showed up if the program was to be what can be expected in
the typical services of a Church of Christ.
It
is amazing how different these meetings can be from the usual
programs. The Dallas gatherings (there have been two now) were hardly
recognizable as of Church of Christ origin. They are less Church of
Christlike than Baptist youth gatherings are unlike the Baptists.
Even when an occasional representative of the Old Guard is on the
program he manages to move out at least to the borders of the
frontier in what he has to say. For the most part the whole works is
in the hands of the young princes, who allow only enough orthodoxy to
keep the show going. This of course is the wisdom of the underground.
One
misses the real spirit that is at work in the Campus Evangelism thing
if he fails to talk with the kids themselves. They are of course born
and bred Church of Christers, all of them, but they are so different
from mainline thinking that it sometimes startles even me. One rather
sophisticated lad from Tennessee volunteered to give me the lowdown
on the congregations in the brotherhood that are free and have the
new look. Though only a student he was in on the know, and he quickly
named about an the unorthodox churches that I knew about, adding one
or two that were new to me. Interestingly enough, Broadway in
Lubbock, the sponsors of the seminar, was not one of them. Even so
the Lubbock brethren are to be commended for arranging such meetings.
One only needs to interview the participants to see what kind of
people we will be tomorrow, due in part to the efforts of Lubbock
today in keeping our young people from running off. The seminars give
them hope that it will someday be different from the way it is in
Nashville, Oklahoma City, Dallas, . . . and Lubbock.
When
the historians of tomorrow are evaluating what is now happening to us
today, searching for the elements that graduated us from
obscurantism, the Hilton Hotel will surely get some of the credit. At
the Hilton one could hear the radiant voices of thousands of youth,
singing new songs of Zion even as they crowded into the corridors,
preparing for an afternoon of witnessing for Christ. The eagerness,
the urgency, the things that were said, the new look, they were all
magnificent. Anyone who has had to listen to the old bromides of the
Church of Christ radio preachers in Dallas, or someone who for years
has been a good sport and gone along to church with a wife who never
misses even a Wednesday night, could nor have possibly recognized the
hotel church as the Church of Christ that he has known all these
years.
What
transpired at the hotel could not have happened in our Dallas
churches, and this is significant. It is characteristic of the
underground to escape the atmosphere where the status quo is
preserved. Like the rebel Roman priests, our young princes also take
their ministry to the hotels. Others go to the ghettoes, the
campuses, private homes, and to counseling groups.
The
Dangerous Underground
All
that we have reviewed thus far is surely on the positive side. Ir is
a report on some of our most spiritual people who are moving
underground for the sake of renewing the church instead of leaving it
to rot in sectarianism. We do not imply by underground that
there is anything ulterior, and certainly nothing divisive. It is
simply the only thing that concerned people can do who choose to stay
rather than leave. They have to become cells or movements on the
periphery of orthodoxy in order to wage peace from within. Like
paratroopers they drop down behind the lines in order to infiltrate
for Christ’s sake.
Because
of this any underground effort tends to be exclusive and
secretive, if not surreptitious. There is an “ingroup”
that doesn’t reveal all it knows. Its meetings are somewhat
controlled, either by charging a fee or by age restriction or by not
advertising. The underground works well by invitation only.
At
the same time as the seminar for the Campus Evangelism there was a
“Holy Spirit retreat” in Dallas, and it is this that I
refer to as the dangerous underground. I do not intend this as
an unloving epithet, for my interest in this retreat is confirmed by
the fact that I helped them to find a meeting place, which turned out
to be Wynnewood Chapel. The elders had reservations about such a
meeting being held there, but believing as they do in free Christian
debate and expression they decided to allow the use of the chapel
without actually sponsoring it.
What
happened is surely the beginning of a new chapter in our history, and
how that chapter ends will depend on how we all react to what is
going on.
The
retreat was not a public meeting, but by invitation. They were there
from all across the United States and from one foreign country,
upwards of 100 in all, and nearly all of them were Church of Christ
folk. Some had left us, others had been driven away; some had
occupied pulpits in well-known congregations. Some had served on our
college faculties, others were or had been elders, writers, song
leaders. A few were bearded and dressed like hippies, but mainly they
were sophisticated, affluent people who were willing to fly across
the country at their own expense to share in a festivity of the Holy
Spirit. It turned out to be the most unique Church of Christ meeting
that I have ever attended.
Most
of them already knew each other or had heard of one another, and the
one thing they all had in common was a quest for things of the
Spirit. Many of them were known to have the gift of tongues, some the
gift of healing, others the gift of prophecy. They believe that the
gifts listed in 1 Cor. 12 are as much for the church today as ever.
All of them had stories to tell of what has happened to them in the
Church of Christ. A brother from California related at length how his
elders assigned him a research project on the Holy Spirit in order to
combat some of the false teaching going on in their community, and
how he studied his way to a belief in the gifts of the Spirit for our
time, and how he was consequently fired. At that time he was the
highest paid minister in the Churches of Christ in his part of the
state. He turned to “secular work” in order to support
his family and be true to his convictions. He told how, as he was
pouring himself some coffee one day, he was singing a spiritual song
only to realize suddenly that it was not in the usual English words,
but in a tongue!
A
brother from a prominent Church of Christ, who was recently an elder,
told of his ministry of healing through prayer, and privately he
related to me how he (and others) had driven a demon from his own
daughter. It was evident that his emergence into the world of the
Holy Spirit had completely transformed his life. He was as kind and
gentle as any man I’ve ever met, certainly manifesting the
fruits listed in Gal. 5 if not the gifts of 1 Cor. 12.
The
testimonies were long but not boring. The meetings were endless,
going well past midnight, and even then only fading out instead of
stopping. Coffee breaks were love feasts, with brotherly love
manifested with an exuberance that was almost unbelievable. There was
a black sister there, real black, who was showered with enough love
to have avoided the Civil War had it come a few generations sooner. I
am not referring to mere outward expressions, such as handshaking and
embracing, though there was a lot of that, but to a feeling of
brotherhood, a real communion of the saints, that pervaded the
atmosphere.
Two
professors who were dismissed from one of our Christian colleges were
there. Robert Meyers told the story sometime back in this journal,
but mentioned no names and did not identify the college, so I will
not do so here. They both revealed depth of character and sincerity
of conviction. I had been eager to meet them and was not
disappointed, for I found them to be men who understood why they had
done what they did, and they could give a responsible witness for
their action. If I understand correctly, they have not left us,
which indicates, considering the way they were treated, a
forbearance all too rare these days. One of them had been on the
faculty for 8 or 9 years, but was dismissed when he confessed to
believing as the other one, all without due academic process.
These
professors, along with dynamic young college men and seminarians (a
number being from ACC), presented “the Pentecostal message”
warmly and effectively. One might wonder what uniqueness a Church of
Christ pentecostalism would have, for these people have reached their
position through their own study and experience with only minimum
contact with Pentecostal churches, if any at all. Church of Christ
pentecostals are quieter, more Bible conscious, more sophisticated,
and not as brusquely emotional as those in Pentecostal churches. This
may be due to their social status as much as to their doctrinal
background in the Church of Christ. They are like the Pentecostals in
that their lives now have a “consciousness of the Holy Spirit”
that overshadows all else. The Holy Spirit, with his gifts and
functions, is the end of all religious experience.
The
retreat in Dallas was marked by much prayer, praise, counseling, and
personal testimony. Classrooms were used for more intimate prayer
groups. Almost continually, even when someone was speaking, small
groups would move back and forth from these candle-lit rooms.
Oftentimes one who was “seeking” would be prayed for,
along with the laying on of hands, that he might receive the Holy
Spirit. One such brother explained to me, in typical Church of Christ
fashion, that he had decided to take Luke 11:13 for what it said.
The
Lord’s Table was kept prepared throughout the retreat, dressed
with a candle as well as goblets of wine. Like the prayer cubicles,
the Supper was also entered into spontaneously, with one free to go
forward at anytime and partake. Two or three would go at a time,
kneel around the Table and break bread together. At one point in the
retreat there was a communion service in which they all participated
together, other than the one on Lord’s Day.
To
my surprise there were but a few instances of tongue-speaking, the
same brother each time, a seminarian. His words were interpreted each
time by another young brother. That fits the order in 1 Cor. 14, they
would say. One speaks in a tongue, another interprets the tongue so
that the others might be edified. This is of course a bold claim for
our time, that on such occasions there is direct communication going
on between God and man. One would suppose that if and when this were
the case that the revelation given would be especially significant,
which in these instances it did not appear to be. They sounded like
paraphrases from some psalm about peace, which is well enough of
course, but if God speaks to his church today through such phenomena
I would expect something weighty and relevant.
They
did things in this retreat in their adoration of the Lord that would
be embarrassing to most of us. They lifted up holy hands in prayer,
praising God with the whole of their being. They wept tears of joy as
they sang and praised his name. They cried “Praise the Lord”
with an enthusiasm that most of us can muster only when watching a
Cowboy football game.
I
found myself deeply gratified with these signs of spiritual revival
within our own Church of Christ ranks. To see people who have long
been discouraged by an inert religion praising God with tears
streaming from dosed eyes, hands lifted heavenward with palms
extended upward as if to receive His grace, and singing hymns in
choked voices that previously had little meaning to them—I say,
to see this is to believe that here are great resources of power for
a spiritual renewal that we must have if we are to survive.
Exorcism
The
most amazing part of the retreat was the driving out of demons. This
was led by a sister who had impressed me as a most remarkable woman,
a responsible Christian eager to help others in their spiritual
growth. But on this occasion she both disturbed and frightened me.
She was dressed like a priestess of the Buddha, with her decorative
kimono reaching to her shoeless feet. After a sermon on the crossing
of the Red Sea, she proceeded to tell us that she had talked to God
that day as she knelt there (pointing to the Lord’s Table) and
she had learned that some of us had demons. Moreover if we did not
yield our wills to His and allow His power to dispose of them, that
she was going to expose us for what we were. She was of an upbraiding
attitude, a perfect semblance of a scolding wife, a role I could not
have previously assigned to her. Her words snapped with fire as she
told us she’d call names, if need be, in order to expose the
demons.
This
is when I got scared, for as I looked over this group of deeply
devoted Christians who were spending their holidays praising God, I
figured that the demons were all taking refuge in me. And that is
what a lot of brethren have been saying about me all these years.
Then too I had some misgivings about some of the things going on in
the retreat, along with my appreciation for so much of it. So I
braced myself for a dressing down that only a woman can give. I only
wondered what demon she would exorcize first.
Already
she had told us that we were to see a miracle, something approaching
to the wonder of the Red Sea. We were to see the power of God
demonstrated in that Chapel in such a way that we would be as amazed
as were the Israelites. When she said this, a responsible man sitting
behind me, long years one of our respected ministers, closed his eyes
and began to praise God for what was to transpire, saying over and
over “Thank God, thank God.”
By
then I hardly knew what to expect. I was too curious to leave and too
scared to stay. Surely she wasn’t going to put the Chapel into
orbit, but I was prepared for almost any thing. I will admit to some
praying on my own part, but it was drastically different from the
good brother sitting behind me.
She
urged all those who wanted to place themselves before the Lord, or
some such words, to do so. Nearly everyone in the room went to the
front and kneeled around her, praying to the Lord. After awhile she
began to exorcize the demons, talking to them as one would a dog.
“Get out of here in the name of Jesus Christ,” she would
say with snarled lips, as she addressed the demon of self. She
upbraided other demons in the same language, such as demon of
self-will and demon of pride. No one cried out nor did any demon go
screaming out the aisle. And the demons within me quieted down to
their normal leisure. The session trailed out into an extended prayer
and soul-searching period, with some of those at the altar remaining
a long time.
But
the dear sister had put on a demonstration the like of which I had
never expected to see among our people. The whole experience jarred
me as a glaring inconsistency to all that had gone before. She was
exorcizing demons from the ones who had for days been manifesting the
power of the Holy Spirit. Do you drive demons from folk who are
baptized of the Holy Spirit? In the scriptures the demons were in
control of the persons they inhabited, but this sister was driving
demons from folk whose lives are controlled by the Holy Spirit.
This
part of the retreat left me disturbed, for there was evidence of the
willingness, at least on the part of some, to supplant the gospel
message with the exorcizing of demons. One of the young men had
brought his sinful, drinking father to this particular service,
hopeful no doubt that his demons would be expelled. Knowing the man
as I did, I welcomed him earlier in the evening, doing all I could to
make him comfortable among strangers. Later when the sister put on
her performance, threatening to call names if necessary, the man
walked out into the night alone, taking with him such demons as he
may have had.
I
suffered as I saw him leave, knowing something of his problem, and I
figured then that that will be his last visit with us. Let us speak
tenderly of Christ to men who need to be made well. Never mind about
their demons. When they are brought to Christ they have access to the
fount of every blessing.
This
is one reason why I call this element among us the dangerous
underground, recognizing full well that there is much to be
commended. It is dangerous because it is working with such terrible
explosives.
It
was my pleasure to address this underground group when they were
guests of Wynnewood Chapel on the Sunday morning they were in Dallas,
just as their retreat got underway. I could sincerely express hope
for what the Holy Spirit movement might do for the Church of Christ,
and yet I went on to name three hazards that must be guarded against.
The foremost danger is that the movement will become another sect. I
observed that this has been the story of Spirit movements throughout
history, from the Montanists to the Moravians. They all end up as
another sect. I explained that in our unity efforts the same charge
was being made, that we’ll build another sect instead of
uniting the divided church. I showed that this charge will prove to
be false, for we cannot build a “unity party” so long as
we do not try to get people to leave where they are and join us. To
the contrary we encourage them to remain where they are and work for
peace and brotherhood there. I challenged them to find similar
safeguards against their own efforts crystallizing in just another
party.
I
saw several sect-forming signs. One was an announcement that some
Spirit-filled family was to move to Dallas, and they were asking, “Is
there anyone in Dallas?” Part of what this meant may be all
right, but there’s part of it that is very dangerous indeed and
it alarms me. I saw it too in the subtle use on the part of some of
the words they and us. One is not quite in, perhaps,
if he has not had certain experiences.
Making
It Too Easy
The
second danger I referred to was that of oversimplification in the
movement’s approach to personal problems. It is risky to
suppose that a Negro with a Molotov cocktail can be made into a
responsible Christian by getting him to speak in tongues, or that a
person with serious emotional illness can be made whole by laying
hands on him. Christian maturation comes slowly and often with great
difficulty. A shortcut by way of the charismatic could prove
disillusioning.
If
they were not careful, I urged, they would succeed only in stirring
up a great brush fire, the enthusiasm of which will glow for a time,
only to fade as people discover that their problems are still with
them. A log fire of thick oak is what is needed, but it is harder to
start and burns more slowly. But it burns through and through and on
and on, giving warmth to the entire house. This must be the role of
the Spirit movement. Let it fire the kindling of God, which is all of
us, that the oaken logs of his kingdom will burn warmly and brightly,
and not be a flash fire out in the back yard that flares and fizzles
out.
But
if the kindling sets fire to the logs, it must be nestled among the
logs, not scattered here and there. I urged them to remain with their
congregations, for it is here that they are most needed. The church
must be reformed from within, and if we do it from within we must be
in. Don’t leave!
Assumption
of Superiority
The
third danger I pointed to was the temptation to presume oneself to
have attained a special status in the kingdom of God while relegating
all others to second-class citizenship. We must not suppose that our
own experiences are qualitatively better than those of others simply
because ours appear more dazzling. Tongue-speaking must surely be a
thrilling experience, allowing for deep and meaningful devotion. So
with the gift of prophecy or the gift of healing, assuming that these
are indeed part of the Christian’s arsenal for this age. Still
the brother whose experience is not in this direction at all, but in
a peaceful relationship with Jesus Christ that no tongue on earth
could make any sweeter than it already is, may be every whit as
glorious as anything experienced in the whole charismatic world. We
must not suppose that everyone must have the same Damascus. My road
may blaze with fire, but my brother’s may be paved with gold.
Neither is to judge his as superior to the other.
Some
readers may suppose that I am making too much of all this, that it is
an overstatement to speak of a Holy Spirit movement among Churches of
Christ, one that could easily solidify into a sect. This being the
case my only recourse is to alarm you. Is it not significant that an
ACC graduate, and a delightful Christian gentlemen he is indeed,
could send notices to some of his Spirit-filled friends of a
retreat in Dallas and get a hundred of them to come from all over the
country during the busiest season of the year?
One
of the participants, for many years one of our preachers, told me
that he could name hundreds of these Spirit-filled people that
are presently in the Church of Christ, meeting in the underground all
over the country.
It
is a movement all right, and I am telling you here that it is the
most significant development in our history as a brotherhood. All the
aspects of the underground Church of Christ that I have discussed are
interrelated. It is one movement. The simultaneous Dallas seminar and
retreat well illustrates this. I bounced back and forth among the two
to learn that there was mutual awareness and mutual interest. A
number visited each other. One night at the hotel a young brother
from the retreat led a discussion on things of the Spirit all night
long!
I
trust I have made it clear that I am greatly encouraged by these
underground activities as a whole, despite some misgivings I have as
to what might happen. Anything that is capable of great power is also
capable of blowing up in our faces, whether it be atomic energy or a
Spirit-filled youth movement.
So
it is with a tempered optimism that I view the scene. As I drove back
and forth in Dallas, from seminar to retreat, passing those symbols
of Church of Christ orthodoxy in between, I reminded myself that all
of these people are my brothers in Christ, and as to what becomes
of them all will depend a great deal on how we now react to the
changing times.
One
thing is sure. The underground church has moved out ahead of the
rest, underground yes, but ahead nonetheless. Never, never will it
return to the doldrums of institutionalism. The only question is
whether the rest of us are Christian enough to cultivate the kind of
brotherhood that makes room for all those who are in Christ, whether
hippie, beatnik, sycophant, prince, rebel or sophist.
We
must lovingly accept the underground and even encourage it. Allow
that Sunday School class to be far out if they must be; encourage
them to read all the stuff and debate all the issues. Permit cell
groups to multiply and filter out into more and more homes.
Sympathize with the youth in their rebellion; listen to them.
Encourage the retreats and seminars, and let the Old Guard keep its
distance. Allow place and opportunity for our charismatic folk to
express themselves and be with each other, and forbid not the
speaking in tongues (1 Cor. 14:39). This would not have to be in our
assemblies, but in their own cells, but still within the context of
our love and understanding, even if not with our full approval.
We
must not alienate, for this is sin. We must not be fearful of each
other, and we must seek to understand where there is obscurity.
We must see the church, not as a community of sameness, but as a
family united in diversity. We should be able to explain to our
neighbors with a sense of satisfaction, “Oh, yes, we have
charismatics in our congregation, several who speak in tongues and
others who prophesy. They are very careful not to impose on those of
us who are not of this persuasion, and we in turn allow for meetings
where they take the initiative and enjoy their gifts, while we sit in
and try to understand it all a little better.”
This
is the Christian response. Anything else will divide and fracture.
The institutional church is going to remain orthodox for years to
come, with changes coming slowly. But even now, while it makes
no radical change, it can allow underground activity within its own
embrace. It doesn’t hurt too badly when others are in front of
us if they are underground. They in turn are willing to remain
a part of us in that they are allowed to grow and move and be
different. So they move ahead underground while we trail behind at
rather ground level orthodoxy. But with this arrangement the
underground always leaves and enters through the institutional
church, thus avoiding segments and parties.
Then,
who knows, but after awhile there’ll be no underground at all,
for differences between us all will grow less and less important,
making underground activity unnecessary. The institutional church
will by then be transformed, partly because of the underground, and
we will all be the family of God together, with grace so abounding
that differences will only serve as guideposts as to whom needs to be
loved the most.—the
Editor