ON
CIVIL DISORDERS
Ouida
and I have been reading our copy of Report of the National
Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, and we can’t say
that it is an enjoyable experience. It is tragic that our nation
faces such peril that such a report is necessary, and yet that such a
step could be taken by a troubled people is evidence that we yet have
some sanity left. President Johnson appointed the Commission in July
of 1967, following the riots that wracked a number of our major
cities, asking that they study the causes and cures, and make
recommendations to him. The Commission’s report covers over 600
pages, and it should be read (at least a summary of it) by every
person who is interested in the future of our nation.
My
wife and I thought it noteworthy that the President chose the kind of
people he did—eleven well-established and politically-moderate
leaders from both politics and business. There were no Stokeley
Carmichaels or Rap Browns, not even any Martin Luther Kings or James
Baldwins selected. There were two Negroes, Senator Edward Brooke and
Roy Wilkins of the NAACP, but these men represent interracial
moderation, not radical militance. There was even a police chief from
Georgia on the Commission!
Those
close to the Commission’s work report that the Georgia
policeman surprised other members of the board with his acute
sensitivity and compassionate approach to the problems.
It
was hardly the type group from which we would expect any suggestions
for sweeping changes or any recommendations that we break new social
ground. And yet the results were such as we would have expected from
radical militants or ultra-liberal intellectuals.
It
is something like having a general in the White House during the
threat of a war. The most hawkish often prove to be the most dovish!
It
is to our nation’s credit that an objective report like
this can be made by its own people, its own leaders. Perhaps we can
remain free so long as we search for all the facts as this report has
done. Ouida was especially impressed that busy men like the
mayor of New York and the president of the United Steel workers would
give so much of their time to this study. At one time they went
through 24 full days of executive sessions, from 9 a.m. till 10 p.m.,
working out what they should report to the President and the nation
relative to their findings. Don’t you think we should at least
read it?
When
I read of such sacrifices and such concern for our deeper social ills
on the part of outsiders, the apathy of my own brethren in
reference to suffering humanity troubled me even more. The concerns
of this Report were the concerns of our Lord. We are most like Christ
when we are giving ourselves to lifting up the fallen, and making men
whole. Jesus gives the abundant life to men. When one reads this
Report and sees for himself what is going on at his own doorstep, he
realizes that the abundant life is far, far away for millions of
Americans in slums and ghettos. Jesus would be concerned, and we are
hardly his church if we do not have a mission to such anguished
souls.
The
most ominous aspect of the Report is the conclusion that “Our
nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white—separate
and unequal” It makes ugly reading—the awful truth that
our nation is indeed tragically divided. To us believers the truth is
even more dreadful: a divided church in a divided nation. Part
of the answer to the problem of a divided church may be for believers
everywhere to join hands in the task of uniting mankind.
The
Commission says the major need is to generate new will, such as the
will to have less ourselves so that others may have more, to tax
ourselves to the extent necessary to meet the vital needs of our
nation. Again we emphasize the encouraging fact that this comes from
a Commission that is politically and economically conservative and
moderate.
There
are of course specific recommendations, such as the creation of two
million new jobs over the next three years. It calls for an end to de
facto segregation through substantial federal aid, and dramatic
improvement of schools serving disadvantaged children. It asks that
the nation establish uniform welfare standards, at least as high as
“the poverty level”, with the federal government assuming
at least 90 percent of total payments. Not least is the request for
six million units of decent housing for low-income people.
The
Commission found no one or two causes for the riots, but a cluster of
causes: unemployment, lack of education, poverty, exploitation,
insecurity, feelings of inferiority, disease, etc. But the essence of
it all is wrapped up in this charge: “What white Americans have
never fully understood—but what the Negro can never forget—is
that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White
institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white
society condones it.”
The
Report goes on to strip us of some of our delusions about the riots,
some that we probably prefer to believe, such as the notion that they
were a conspiracy, by the Communists or somebody. The riots
were spontaneous and voluntary, growing out of the impossible
conditions clearly outlined in the Report.
All
of this should be a challenge to the faith of us all. Our Lord came
to a world enslaved and impoverished by Rome. Ours is a nation
suffering from the injustices of white supremacy, prejudice, and
apathy. He brought wholeness to men, and in doing this he fed them as
well as taught them. If we have his Spirit in us, we too must bring
wholeness to the impoverished of our nation. This is why the gospel
of Christ always has been and always will be a social gospel.—the
Editor