Things That Matter Most . . . No. 1
THE MEANING OF TRUE HAPPINESS
Only a few things have universal application, but the
desire for happiness is presumably one of them. It seems safe to say
that all men desire happiness, even when they differ broadly as to
what it means to be happy. Perhaps the desire is natural, being as
instinctive as self-preservation. Surely there are many more people
who refer to happiness as their life’s goal than have any real
understanding of the nature of happiness. One would be hard put to go
out into the world to find someone who does not want to be happy, but
it would be equally difficult to find someone who has a clear
understanding as to what he means by the term. It is shrouded with
vagueness.
In reply to my question as to what happiness is, one
person said that it is having everything one desires, which is more
definitive than most answers you will get. Having everything that one
desires! We would suppose that if that would
not make a man happy, then he just cannot be made happy. And yet
there have been many miserable people that have had everything they
desired. So there may be an important relationship between what
one desires and his being happy. Thus in the
title of this essay we imply a distinction between true and false
happiness. Many there are who think they are happy who are not really
happy. This is true of many things: people
think themselves well when they are diseased or as educated when they
are ignorant.
What Is Happiness?
The common view is that happiness is a kind of pleasant
feeling about life’s experiences, whether love, work or play.
It is the composite of many pleasures, including good health,
prosperity, and a life absent of tragedy. Webster defines it as “a
state of well-being and pleasurable satisfaction; bliss”.
These ideas of happiness raise questions about what pleasure means. Jesus
is referred to in prophecy as “a Man of sorrows,” and His
life would hardly be viewed as a life of pleasure, and yet we think
of His life as the very essence of happiness, in spite of all the
suffering He endured and the tragedy He experienced. Prison or the
rack can hardly be thought of as pleasant, but might a man who is
subjected to such pain be happy nonetheless. So if we define
happiness in terms of pleasure we have to keep kinds
of pleasure in mind.
Sigmund Freud put his psychoanalytic mind to the task
of explaining happiness, and he concluded that the opposite of
happiness is not tragedy but neurosis. Happiness is therefore peace
of mind. He sees the happy person as one who masters his inner
conflicts and is well-adjusted to his environment. This view will
allow for pain and tragedy, but shows that happiness involves a quality of soul that
knows how to cope with hardship.
If the Greeks had a word for everything else, we can be
sure that they had one for happiness. In fact they had several, for
happiness was considered the summum bonum of
life, and the great philosophers dedicated their lives to the study
of what makes life good. Plato defines happiness as spiritual
well-being, as harmony in the soul, and as inner peace. The happy man
is the just man, Plato
points out, and justice refers to the well-ordered life. To live
justly is to live harmoniously, with one’s mind, body and soul
in proper balance, and this is happiness.
Aristotle sees happiness as the only intrinsic good.
Whether you name love, duty, courage, honesty, beauty or whatever, he
would say things are all unto happiness.
His word for it would best be translated self-realization.
As a man fulfills his potential, something
like an acorn becomes an oak, he is happy. It is the virtuous man
that is happy, in other words, and by virtue
Aristotle means proper
function. A knife has virtue if it cuts; a
tree has virtue if it bears fruit. So a man is virtuous if he is
reasonable and otherwise behaves as a man is suppose to, according to
his nature.
It was our of the context of this kind of thinking that
gave us the word we translate sin. To
the Greeks it meant “missing the mark,” such as the
archer does when his arrow misses the target. It is thus the
misdirected life that is sinful, a life that does not move toward
fulfillment. The Christian sees sin as that which moves a man off the
course set for him by the will of God. We may be, therefore, close to
the meaning of happiness when we associate it with the fulfillment of
our potential according to God’s will. Happiness (hitting the
mark) and sin (missing the mark) may come close to being opposites.
While Aristotle insists that man needs at least a
minimum of material wealth to be happy, the Greeks generally stress
the internal aspects
of man as that which makes for happiness. They thus prepared the soil
for the Christian teaching on the subject. Socrates was the first to
talk about “nurturing the soul” in order to be happy. He
spoke of death as an experience to be desired, for then one could be
with God and enjoy an even greater happiness. Plato writes that “a
pattern is laid up in heaven” for the good life, and for this
reason the pleasures of the mind are much more important than those
of the flesh. The man, therefore, who injures others for personal
gain is miserable, while he who chooses to suffer wrong rather than
commit wrong is happy. Thus the Greeks see the happy man as virtuous,
disciplined, reasonable, and one who is motivated by high ideals.
Building on these Greek concepts, John Stuart Mill
expresses his happiness theory in terms of “the greatest
happiness for the greatest number,” and he believes this is
motivated by “a sense of humanity” within us all. We all
want to be happy ourselves, and we have the noble impulse to make
others happy. So the good life consists in creating as much happiness
as possible for as many people as possible, including one’s
self. And Mill is distinctly Christian in his thinking when he
observes that a man should choose to sacrifice his own well-being in
order to bring an abundance of happiness to many others. This is what
Jesus did, and it is the responsibility of all Christians. Mill’s
point is that pleasure or happiness is the justifiable goal for man;
it is that for which all humanity should be striving. A Christian
should seek to generate as much happiness in this world as possible,
and eventually even greater bliss in heaven, both for himself and for
others. But in any situation in which his own happiness conflicts
with the happiness of many, he must yield to “the greatest
happiness for the greatest number.” Thus we find Paul saying of
his Jewish brethren: “I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish
in my heart, for I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off
from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen by race.”
(Rom. 9:2-3)
There is a blessed contradiction in all this, for as
one forfeits his own well-being for the good of others he discovers
the highest happiness. “He who finds his life will lose it, and
he who loses his life for my sake will find it.” (Matt. 10:39)
Is not Jesus saying that if one is willing to be “unhappy”
so that others might be happy that that man finds an even higher
happiness? We put “unhappy” in quotation marks, for he is
not really unhappy in doing what he believes God wants him to do,
though he may suffer pain and hardship.
This gets at the nature of true happiness. Jesus was
truly happy even on the cross, for He had that peace of mind that can
come only through a will that is completely surrendered to God. Even
amidst severe pain and privation one may enjoy pleasures of soul.
Ordinarily we do not think of a man being happy when rocks are being
thrown at him, and yet it is possible that Stephen’s happiest
experience on earth was when he “gazed into heaven and saw the
glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God”
(Acts 7:55) , despite the stones.
We must conclude, therefore, that true happiness is
related to one’s personal communion with God. One may be
“happy” in a materialistic sense in that “he has
everything he wants,” and yet not be in communion with God. But
we have to say that such a one does not want the things he ought to
want. He is ignorant of the things that matter most. If he would look
deep inside himself he would discover unfulfilled desires that only a
turning to God can satisfy. The happy life is the transformed life,
one made into the likeness of Christ by the grace of God. Happiness
is the quiet joy of a surrendered life. It is the satisfaction that
all is well between God and self.
Ingredients of Happiness
What is the essence of happiness—the one
ingredient without which one cannot be happy? Hardly any term will
serve to answer this as does selflessness. One
of the most striking descriptions of our Lord tells us that “Christ
did not please himself . . .” (Heb. 13:3) In this context we
have the prescription for happiness: “Let us each please his
neighbor for his good, to edify him, and not to please ourselves.”
The Christian is to see selflessness as more than the
noble effort of putting God first, others second, and ourselves last.
We can run right smack into a mess of pride with this kind of
thinking. To the measure that we become truly selfless we do not
count at all, whether first, second or last. We will not even think
in those terms. The self becomes unmindful of where it stands, first
or last, for a consciousness of any position of self savors of pride.
Our Lord did not merely put others before Himself, for He did not
consider Himself at all.
“For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that by
his poverty you might become rich.” (2 Cor. 8:9)
“Have this mind among yourselves, which you have
in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count
equality with God a think to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking
the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being
found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto
death, even death on a cross.” (Phil. 2:5-8)
He was rich, but chose to become poor! Though in
heavenly glory, He emptied Himself! Is this not the way of real
happiness? And so Paul urges: “Do nothing from selfishness or
conceit, but in humility count others better than yourselves.”
(Phil. 2:3)
Notice that language: count
others better than yourself! He is really
saying, Forget self! or
perhaps, Lose yourself in service to others!
We cannot achieve such a standard on our own. It is not a matter of
self-discipline. It calls for a transformation of life, a new birth.
It demands the death of the old self within us. It is the kind of
selflessness Paul speaks of in Gal. 2:20: “I have been
crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ who
lives in me; and the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in
the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”
“For you have died, and your life is hid with
Christ in God.” (Col. 3:3) This is the selflessness that makes
for real happiness. It is a happiness that is not directly sought. It
is Christ that we seek. His we are and Him we serve, as Paul puts it.
We are not trying to achieve happiness. Rather we hide our lives in
God by forgetting self. The happiest people are those who are not
particularly aware of happiness itself. They simply do not give
themselves enough thought to consider whether they are happy.
Happiness is like humility in this regard. Humility is
not something you work hard to achieve. The humble person would never
say, “Well, I’ve had a pretty good day today in being
humble. Maybe I can be even more humble tomorrow.” Nor would he
be like the Trappist monk that described his Order’s strongest
point by commenting: “We are known for our humility.” A
conscious humility is pride. In the same way the happiest people are
not those with a “Be Happy Today” program going. They are
busy serving, too busy to be concerned even about their own
happiness. They are, of course, happy, the happiest of all people,
but it was not attained through conscious effort. Again the Lord’s
assuring promise: “He who finds his life will lose it, and he
who loses his life for my sake will find it.”
Everyone has his own idea about what makes people
happy. Some say money, others say friends. Some emphasize health,
others education. Surely all such values are ingredients in varying
degrees for the good life. But it is Cicero’s statement that
intrigues me: “It is character, not circumstance, that makes
one happy.” Maybe that is an overstatement, for it does seem
that a modicum of favorable circumstance is necessary to happiness.
It is understandable that a man is not happy when unemployed, sick,
or hungry—or dying on a field of battle. Yet as a Christian he
can be happy, even in travail. We have to concede, however, that it
is a rare exception when a man is happy in dire circumstance. But
Cicero’s statement is pointing to the right ingredients when he
says character is what
makes people happy. And he is very Christian in this emphasis, for
this is precisely Jesus’ point in the beatitudes He gave. That
is what blessed means;
it means happy. In
giving them Jesus was instructing regarding character.
“Happy are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven.” This blessing of Jesus has in it a whole
attitude toward life. It searches a man’s character. It is
saying that the way to power is through realizing one’s
helplessness, and the way to victory is through the admission of
defeat. It also shows that wealth does not consist in the possession
of things. It is saying that happiness in this world and in eternity
comes through a humble acceptance of God’s will in one’s
life.
“Happy are they that mourn, for they shall be
comforted.” The story is told of a great musician who was
listening to a talented young singer, who had a beautiful voice but
had just missed greatness. “She will be great,” said the
old master, “when something happens to break her heart.”
Robert Frost was saying something similar when he observed that the
heart of a poet must break before he writes great poetry. As
paradoxical as it appears, our Lord is relating sorrow to bliss, that
there can be no true bliss without mourning. The old Arab proverb
says it this way: “All sunshine makes a desert.” Perhaps
our Lord is telling us that heavenly bliss comes to those who sorrow
over the predicament of humanity with all its sin and suffering. It
may be proper for a Christian to be detached from things,
but never from people.
He cannot have the passivity of a Stoic, but
the kind of spirit that rejoices with those that rejoice and weeps
with those that weep. It is the man who, like his Lord, is “moved
with compassion” in the presence of a troubled world that will
enjoy eternal bliss.
“Happy are the meek, for they shall inherit the
earth.” Meekness is a badly understood term in our culture, and
very few would think of it as an ingredient for happiness. Nietzsche
called it “a slave morality,” insisting that meekness is
nothing but weakness. But the poet Browning had deeper insight, for
he could see strength and gentleness combined. It is good to have a
giant’s strength, he pointed out, but not good to use it like a
giant. Jesus is referring to the God-controlled man as the happy man.
Nietzsche’s fallacy is that he saw power as an end in itself,
not as a means to something greater. Jesus too speaks of power. He
would say with Bacon that knowledge is power. So is money. So is fame
and position. But the happy man, Jesus is saying, is the man who lets
God so control his life that all his capacities for power are
sublimated by love and service to others.
So with all the beatitudes. They relate character to
happiness, just like old Cicero did. “Happy are they that
hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled,”
is referring to the bliss of the starving soul. The man who feels no
real need before God will never be happy. He is too full of self.
Obstacles to Happiness
From our conclusions thus far we are obligated to point
to selfishness as the
most serious obstacle to a happy life. But there are, of course,
other obstacles, some of which no doubt stand in the way even when
selfishness does not. Ignorance for instance. Surely we are morally
obligated to be informed and intelligent, and when we spurn such a
duty the penalty is unhappiness in one form or another. Plato was not
far wrong in equating knowledge with virtue. While ignorance is often
excusable, it nonetheless takes its toll. Wilful ignorance is
terribly wrong. That ignorance is bliss is one of the great lies of
the ages. It is the same lie that teaches us not to be bothered with
racial and social outcasts amidst all their poverty and ignorance
since “they are happier than we are.” How can an ignorant
man be happy when it is so contrary to nature? God made him to think
and to know and to solve problems and to be challenged by ideas. Keep
him in ignorance so he will be happy? Ridiculous! God wants him to be
educated, and the better educated he is the greater his capacity for
happiness. While it is true that one might get the wrong kind of
education, no one can ever become too well educated. We do, of
course, have reference to the cultivation of the mind and soul rather
than academic degrees or years in school.
A man’s chances for happiness may also be hurt by
ambition and jealousy. King Saul’s jealousy of David enslaved
him. Despair and neurosis was the reward, whereas he otherwise had
such a great potential for happiness. Shakespeare’s Macbeth was
once tied in love and singleness of purpose to his wife; he was
brave, noble, imaginative. Happiness was his to have, but he was
ruined by reckless ambition, an ambition that did not stop even with
murder. He illustrates how tragedy is the opposite of happiness.
Surely having what one desires has something to do with being happy,
but so much depends on what one
desires and how much he
desires it. Ambition can blind one and even pervert his imagination,
as it did to Macbeth.
Buddhism makes a good point in identifying unhappiness
as the universal problem of life, and in recognizing “selfish
craving” as the cause of the misery in the world. The purpose
of its “Eightfold Path” is to show man how to escape from
unbridled desire. The eight steps are right understanding, right
purpose, right speech, right conduct, right vocation, right effort,
right alertness, right concentration.
A noble list of ingredients for happiness to be sure. The Christian would insist on no less, but he would urge that the Christ walk with us upon the path. Not only because it would be lonely without Him, but because there can be no happiness without Him.—the Editor
![]()
Thou shalt seek out every day the company of the saints, to be refreshed by their words.—Didache 4:2