RESPONSE FROM READERS
Have
a wonderful, wonderful time in Bethany! Be sure to write the details
for those of us who cannot get there. Our thoughts and prayers go
with you. Good for Ouida for going along! —Colorado
(We
plan to write about the Bethany meeting in the September issue.
—Editor)
I am
very
pleased with your periodical and with the good it is doing. I hope I have
changed my way of thinking toward others who are in Christ. I realize that I
have a long way to go, but with the Lord’s help I will make progress. —Washington
I enjoy
very
much reading your publication. Not that I always agree with your thinking, but
that you allow the right to disagree. Only by this attitude can brethren ever
approach dwelling in unity as God’s family. —Michigan
We both
admire you for the work you are doing and we are seeing many direct changes in
the Church of Christ. For you and men like you we say Hurray! —Kansas
The
March
issue was handed me by a friend, and I enjoyed reading it so much I wish to
subscribe for the year. —California
It
appears
to me that you are seeking to attain that for which Campbell strove, namely the
unity of God’s people, but that you are endeavoring to accomplish it exactly by
opposite means. He endeavored to bring people out of denominationalism, where as
it seems you are agreeable to their remaining in it. —Texas.
(I
most certainly seek to lead people out of sectarianism, but this does
not necessarily mean they have to leave their denomination, whether
it be Baptist or Church of Christ. One might be in a sect without
being a sectarian. One does not “leave denominationalism”
simply by changing churches, even when he changes to the
right
(?)
church. It is the right relationship with Christ that delivers one
from sectarianism, and I desire to deliver all from this evil.
Campbell’s basis for unity was the Lordship of Christ, not
doctrinal conformity. This is my position. —Editor)
From some
of the reports that I have heard you can be sure that you are having a real
influence among large groups of Church of Christ people. One preacher I talked
to had just returned from Lubbock Christian College and he could not say “Leroy
Garrett” with enough bitterness to suit him. I can only encourage you to keep
working and to assure you that we pray for you often. I do hope that more of our
brethren learn to really know Jesus and to experience the workings of the Spirit
in their lives. —Oregon
(We
want to thank all those who are praying for us and for our work in
Restoration
Review.
We
urge all our readers who believe in the power of prayer to pray for
the union of all believers, and that this journal may be used in such
a glorious work. —Editor)
I
especially
enjoyed your article on
The
Gift of the Holy Spirit.
Robert
Myers’ article should be helpful to the young preachers and
others who have not yet been exposed to such thinking. He’s a
sportwriter! —New
Mexico
I like
your
style. Far too much discussion of divisive issues is in grim, ponderous
humorlessness. The rapier of wit can do more than the bludgeon of logic. And
perhaps the needle of irony can do better. —Nebraska
Your
article on The
Gift of the Holy Spirit is
tops. Your keen analysis of the problems we face within Churches of
Christ needs to be admitted by all of us. Recently I heard a C of C
preacher on the radio on this very subject. He spent about two-thirds
of his time saying what the Holy Spirit did not do. It was quite obvious
that his guns were trained on the Holiness groups . . . I also enjoyed Robert
Meyers’ penetrating article
Custom
or Command.
He
writes with much insight into our problems. —Louisiana
I
was
pleased to hear of your trip to ACC, though I can’t share
the full measure of your optimism about its implications. Clearly,
you could hardly expect a tumultuous welcome at ole DLC, which will
be one of the last bastions of the old ways, even more now than ever
before. But keep it up! I admire your pluck, envy your perseverance,
and especially covet your faith. Yours is a voice of concern, mine of
despair. —Tennessee
(No,
no! Let us never despair. The prophet Jeremiah was sure there wasn’t
a real man in all Jerusalem, and he went through the streets looking
for one, just to prove his point. He just knew there wasn’t
even one. And yet when he was brought before the Jewish clergy and
was about to be put to death, enough young princes rose up in his
defense that the clergy was forced to back down. Warning to DLC:
watch
out for the young princes!
—Editor)
Let
me pass an interesting incident about your paper along to you. One of
my preaching friends has wondered aloud to me, “What is wrong
with Leroy Garrett? He must be crazy or something.” Well, sir,
just the other day he was using my telephone and noticed a copy of
Restoration
Review
nearby.
On the cover I had written
see
page
27.
He turned and read it. He came to me open-mouthed and told me there
just wasn’t a thing in that article he could disagree with. The
article? “Fellowship and Brothers in Error.” —Canada
(My
problem is not so much with those who
read
what
I write, but with those who don’t or won’t. —Editor)