AN
EVENING AT THE CONCERT
My
family and I are sometimes able to enjoy the cultural activities at
Texas Woman’s University, where I am employed as a professor of
philosophy. We think it is good for our children’s education to
hear Fred Waring’s
Pennsylvanians,
Martha
Schlamme, that glorious soprano folk singer, and Philip Entremont,
the world-renowned pianist. Our children are fortunate to grow up in
an academic community where there is more concern for “the
things that matter most.” Besides the cultural benefits, we all
enjoy these occasional evenings attending an opera, a play, or a
concert.
It
disappoints me that many of our young people, the college girls as
well as my own children, appreciate
light
art
(to use a kind term) more than serious art. When we have someone like
the Four Freshmen or The Beatles at T. W. U. there is not a vacant
seat in our large auditorium, while the attendance for an organ
concert or a ballet is sometimes embarrassing. But that is part of
education—exposing them to excellence—and that is why I
favor compulsory
attendance
when the masters come to our campus. Just as a child has to be
trained, with a bit of firm persuasion, to eat many foods that are
good for him (I try to teach mine to eat any food placed before them
and never to say or think “I don’t like that”), so
a college student does not yet know what is good for him
educationally. If we can require a university woman to take a foreign
language or philosophy because they are necessary to her education,
we can also require her to “take” Philippe Entremont when
he comes to our campus. Oftentimes people do not know what they like
until they have experienced it. Our aesthetic sense will respond to
the finer arts if we will only expose it to a little cultivation.
The
other evening my family had an evening with the Kansas City
Philharmonic on our campus, with one of my brothers from Dallas and
his family sitting with us. As I sat listening to these masters of
harmony, more than eighty of them, my mind turned to some of the
subjects that concern us in this journal. I thought I would share
some of them with you.
The
people that make up this famous symphony orchestra are the epitome of
diversity. Some are very young, others quite old; a few are but
“beginners” in comparison to the veteran masters. Some
are single and some are married, with a number of them married to
each other, which is encouraged by the troupe. Some are male and some
female, some short and some tall; some quite handsome and some not.
While there was a lot of hair, some had little or none. No doubt but
what the emotional patterns of each one are unique, and that they
differ as much in their thinking about most everything, including
music, as they differ in their looks. Their instruments were also
very different from each other.
As
I thought of the diversity of these musicians I was all the more
impressed with the glorious unity of their presentation. As they
played Cesar Franck’s Symphony in D Minor, which has been
described as having unchallenged preeminence as the crown of
symphonic art in France, I realized the meaning of unity in
diversity. Harmony, in fact, can come in no other way but by the
union of diverse elements. I enjoyed closing my eyes and listening to
the symphony as it filled the auditorium like the voice of a million
birds all in perfect unison. Then to open my eyes and behold eighty
different people intensely engrossed over a score of varied
instruments—it was an edifying experience. The rhythmic sounds
came floating by, some tenderly as if on tiptoe, some mysteriously as
if crescendos from a mystic sea.
As
I pondered on each of the diverse elements the wholeness that I was
enjoying was partly lost. Some of the musicians appeared to have such
an insignificant role. One of them spent most of his time holding
aloft a triangular chime which he would strike only occasionally, and
then ever so delicately. Even when his rare moments came I found it
difficult to discern his contribution. “All the way from Kansas
City, and all that money, just for that …” I was tempted
to think. I counted something like 45 or 50 violinists and violaists,
each one intensely involved, making his own contribution to the
symphony. “Are so many stringed instruments necessary? …”
I went on thinking. “Would it make any difference if one or two
of them came up missing, and if not, why have them to start with?”
And I wondered if one of them happened to touch the wrong string just
once if the director would notice, and if so, what he would think
about it.
Despite
the magnificence of the unity of the symphony, I realized that the
unity was not an end in itself. The fourscore musicians achieved
oneness with artistic precision, but this was not the end they had in
view. They did not come down from Kansas City simply to demonstrate
that they could play together! Unity was but the means to something
greater. We might say their end was communication, which would have
been impossible without unity.
Unity
is never its own end. A man and his wife are united by the bond of
marriage, but the unity makes possible something higher. Jesus prayed
that His disciples would be one “so that the world may realize
that you sent me and have loved them as you loved me.” Unity
was the means, the witness to the world, the end. Our struggle for
unity should never be viewed as an end in itself, but as a means of
demonstrating to the world the power of a Spirit-filled people, and
for the salvation of lost souls.
“How
does the orchestra realize such a beautiful unity?” I asked
myself. My wife mentioned the obvious self-discipline of the group
and the lifetime of hard work, and while this is relevant, it is not
the essence of the unity. In my philosophy classes at the college we
conclude that the
essence
of
a thing is what that thing must have to be what it is. A knife that
no longer cuts or a watch that no longer runs has lost its essence.
You might have eighty musicians with barrels of self-discipline and
hard work and still not have unity. All the knowledge of music that a
brain can hold will not itself produce unity. Even a lifetime of
experience in concert music is not the answer, for such veterans may
play in unison on one occasion and with discord the next. As germane
as all these elements, are there is something else that is the
essence. Or there is someone
else,
we should say.
It
is of course the director of the orchestra that is the cohesive
influence that makes the symphonic presentations possible. Without
him there would be no symphony, irrespective of the knowledge,
discipline, and experience of the group. As I held my youngest child
in my lap I whispered to him to watch the eyes of the players, how
closely they watched the director. While the written music before
them was faithfully referred to, it was the director that unified
them. My little boy and I became especially fascinated with the man
with the drums, who hardly took his eyes from the majestic movements
of his master’s wand. He watched intently, and then at the
precise moment, he hammered upon his drums with his twin batons,
sometimes with the rapidity and fury of an attacking tiger and
sometimes with the gentleness of a mother’s kiss.
Whatever
their relationship might be off stage, I thought, in this moment the
director and his followers are one. His cohesive influence is
stronger than any petty differences that may exist, and his authority
transcends all divergent theories. While the written music is of
course necessary, it is the person of the director that gives life to
the symphony, and it is he that makes it possible for each musician
to contribute his own unique part to the whole, however small. The
director’s place is central. His towering figure, with baton in
position, symbolized the fact that he
is
the
symphony, for without him there would be only a group of talented
people. He makes the many one and inspires the parts into wholeness.
All
of this wonderfully illustrated to me the centrality of the Christ to
our lives. He is both the ground of our being and the basis of our
oneness. He
is
Christianity,
and it is only as we reflect His glory in our lives that our part has
any meaning. Our eyes and our affections must always be upon Him.
However precious and vital the written Word is to us it is the Living
Word that is the cohesive power. As we are drawn closed to Him we are
drawn closer to each other. Because of His love for us and our love
for Him we are in love with each other. In Him racial and class
distinctions disappear, and because of Him doctrinal differences are
no longer preeminent.
Phillips’
rendition of Eph. 1:9-10 is in order here:
“God
has allowed us to know the secret of his plan, and it is this: he
purposes in his sovereign will that all human history shall be
consummated in Christ, that everything that exists in Heaven or earth
shall find perfection and fulfillment in him.”
God’s
plan is to unite all things in heaven and on earth in Christ. This is
the end God had in view from the beginning, and it should be the goal
of all our labors. The unity of all God’s children on earth,
for which we are striving, is therefore a means for attaining God’s
eternal purpose, the unity of all heaven and earth in Christ. When we
are one, as God and Christ are one, we manifest the glory of God with
such brilliance that even the angels in heaven take notice. This
brings us to our final point.
The
concert that we heard also reminded me of the church’s role in
glorifying God before all heaven and earth. The audience was a
participant in that each of us was a witness to an unfolding drama. I
thought of the pageant that God is producing for the angels in heaven
as a demonstration of his wisdom. To quote Phillips again: “The
purpose is that all the angelic powers should now see the complex
wisdom of God’s plan being worked out through the church, in
conformity to that timeless purpose which he centered in Jesus, our
Lord.” Eph.3:10
God
is conducting a symphony, this passage is saying. The angels are His
audience. The church is the orchestra, with every saint performing
according to his talent. The rendition is the glory, majesty, and
wisdom of God. Praise His name!
As
the heavenly hosts bear witness to this panorama of God’s
manifold witness, they praise God. By means of the church’s
symphonic production all of heaven and earth become one in Christ.
What a glorious view Paul is giving us of God’s eternal
purpose!
As
we sat waiting for the concert to begin there were discordant sounds
aplenty. While each musician was thumping or blowing on his
instrument, each one indifferent to the others as he endeavored to
get his strings or brass in tune, I was thankful that the whole
evening would not be this way. “What torture it would be,”
I said to myself, “if I had to sit through all this fuss for
very long.’” But in a moment the director appeared, in
his majestic black and tails, and the musicians all stood in honor of
his presence. He first shook hands with his first violinist who sat
at his right hand, and then he bowed to his audience. He mounted the
platform and raised his arms. All eyes were fixed upon the wand in
his right hand. His arms moved and the drama began. What majesty!
What
does the angelic host behold as they watch those of us that make up
the kingdom of God on earth? They can bear to see us in discord if,
when the Christ steps into our lives, a change takes place. They can
understand our weaknesses and foibles, and even the occasional foul
notes that we are certain to make, if our eyes are upon our Director
and if all are participating in the holy concert through the grace
that only He can bestow. We cannot all be first violinists, but we
can all share the common life, performing whatever humble tasks He
assigns us.
The angels will be watching. And they will applaud.
![]()
No
man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of a
continent, a part of the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friends or of thine own were; any man’s death
diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never
send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. —John
Donne