
RECIPROCAL
MINISTRY
The
Yoke of Christ, Elton Trueblood. Harper and Bro., New York. 1958.
$3.00.
Professor
Trueblood of Earlham College writes more like a Disciple than most
Disciples. Such previous works as Your Other Vocation and
Signs of Hope are rich with notions common to the Disciple
heritage. As a Quaker Mr. Trueblood defends the concept of universal
priesthood, and he repeatedly finds ways and means of narrowing the
gap between clergy and laity. The Yoke of Christ is his latest
contribution, being a collection of sermons or essays that were
prepared for different occasions and which have no necessary
connection with each other. These are diverse enough to cover the
usual strong points of Trueblood’s philosophy — social
ethics, moral responsibility, logical faith, priesthood of all
believers, a militant church, Christian homelife.
One essay
of especial interest is “A Faith for Scientists” which
defines a true scientist as one “who is always trying to
disprove his own hypothesis.” The reader will be impressed with
the definition of faith given in this essay: “Faith is trust in
a fundamental meaningfulness which is not wholly proved and
presumably will not be wholly proved in our finite existence, but
which makes more sense out of our puzzling world than does any
conceivable alternative.” For faith to be real it must
recognize that our knowledge is extremely fragmentary. Faith must
also be honest. Trueblood believes that a devout man will accept the
rules of logic. So a faith that is real will produce genuine humility
and it will speak to the whole man. Faith is the enemy of all
intellectual dishonesty.
The
author feels that church union is not so much “the great new
fact of our time” (quoting Archbishop William Temple) as is
“the powerful drive in developing a universal ministry.”
In his essay on “The Abolition of the Laity” Trueblood
contends that early Christianity was a movement in which the
distinction between clergy and laity was utterly unknown. He
says, “Our conventional distinction between clerical and lay
Christians does not appear anywhere in the entire New Testament.”
He adds that “there was at first nothing that even approached
the separated priesthood. Our task is not to abolish the clergy, but
the laity! The mood of the primitive church was anti-lay rather than
anti-clerical, for all God’s people are clergy. Trueblood
argues that the purpose of a good pastor is to make the universal
ministry succeed.
Other
essays are equally stimulating. In “The Problem of the Crowd”
the author shows that Jesus’ greatest work was done with small
groups and within the inner circle. Every church needs a committed
inner circle, which can become the answer to the problem of bigness.
He points Out in his “The Salt of the Earth” that any
good thing continues to prosper only through vigilant solicitude. The
church, like soil, tends to erode unless laborious efforts are made
to maintain it. Christ left no army; he left no organization in the
ordinary sense; he did not even leave a book. But he did leave “the
salt of the earth” in a little redemptive fellowship made up of
extremely common people whose rotal impact was miraculous. A pinch of
salt is effective Out of all proportion to its amount.
In his
sermon on “Called to Be Saints” Trueblood explains what
it means to be called a saint. He describes both the degradation and
the glory of the church, and he shows that the church is necessarily
made up of people who realize that they are sinners. People are
reluctant to call themselves saints because they feel that only
certain appointed leaders deserve such a term. But in the primitive
church saint and member were synonymous terms. In his “Courage
to Care” the point is made that the welfare of others, for
people who love are the ones who sometime suffer heartache and
disappointment. The reward of loving is better understanding, for
insight comes through involvement.
To those
of us of the Restoration Movement the insight that Trueblood has of
the spirit of primitive Christianity is indeed encouraging. This
quotation should provoke thought on the part of us who seem so
confident that we have restored the ancient order.
It is hard for us to visualize what early Christianity was like. Certainly it was very different from the Christianity known to us today. There were no fine buildings. In most places there were, in fact, no Christian buildings at all. There was no hierarchy; there were no theological seminaries; there were no Christian colleges; there were no Sunday Schools; there were no choirs. Only small groups of believers—small fellowships. In the beginning there wasn’t even a New Testament. The New Testament itself was not so much a cause of these fellowships as a result of them. Thus the first books of the New Testament were the letters written to the little fellowships partly because of their difficulties, dangers, and temptations.
All they had was the fellowship; nothing else; no standing; no prestige; no honor. For a long time practically none were citizens of the Roman Empire. The citizenship of Paul was stressed partly because it was so rare. It was actually true, and not mere rhetoric, to say, “Not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth” (I Cor, 1:26). The early Christians were not people of standing, but they had a secret power among them, and the secret power resulted from the way in which they were members one of another.
—LEROY GARRETT
SEGREGATION
ISSUE
No
North or South, Roger H. Crook, Bethany Press, St. Louis,
Missouri, 1959, $2.50.
On May
17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision
which spelled doom to a way of life. It declared racial segregation
in public schools to be unconstitutional. The full effect of that
decision is not even now discernible.
Roger
Crook, Associate Professor of Religion at Meredith College in
Raleigh, North Carolina, writes in a clear, concise, and objective
way what he believes our attitudes as Christians and
democracy-believing Americans should be in this present situation. He
writes not as a rabble rouser but as one genuinely interested in
bringing understanding and harmony to a tension filled problem.
He
realizes that the greatest barriers to an answer to the problem is
prejudice which he aptly defines as “a decision made and acted
upon with sufficient information.” He points out that a
Christian has pledged himself to seek for truth. “His search
for truth may lead him to conclusions which are unpopular, and he may
find himself at odds not only with his neighbor but with his own
predisposition.”
Mr. Crook
does not write in generalizations. He strikes at the tap roots when
he investigates the arguments in favor of segregation such as the
claim that the Negro is innately inferior. This is mistakenly
supposed to be proven by the white man’s cultural superiority.
But how many realize that there was a great Negro civilization in the
15th century in what is now French West Africa? There was a
university in Timbuktu famous throughout Spain, North Africa, and the
Near East. To this culture, destroyed in the late 15th century by the
Moslems, we are indebted “for the knowledge of how to smelt and
use iron are and for much of our legal procedure.”
He shows
how we tend to judge the Negro by stereotype. He is pictured as lazy,
carefree, dirty, dishonest, and ignorant. This concept is perpetuated
by movies and radio programs such as “Amos ‘n’
Andy.” The things white people object to, he points out, are
not racial characteristics but cultural, and as such
are found in white people as well as Negroes.
He also
treats the arguments that inter-racial marriages lead to race
mongrelization, and that the Bible sanctions segregation. Concerning
the latter, he gives an interesting expose of the “curse of
Ham” found in Genesis 9:25-27. He deals also with the question
most of us have heard voiced; “Would you want your daughter to
marry a Negro?”
He writes
with feeling as he tells about the life of the Negro school teacher
under Jim Crow law. Although most of her dealings are with those of
her own race who consider her first of all as a person, she may be
subordinate to a superintendent of schools, a white man, who is
reluctant to address her as “Miss.” “The facilities
with which she works may be inadequate and inferior to those of her
white neighbors. She can therefore never get away entirely from the
fact that the conditions of her life are determined by white people
largely on the basis of the fact that she is a Negro.”
Mr. Crook
also approaches the problem positively as he lists what we can do to
help answer the problem. One of these, the most important for those
who profess to be the followers of Jesus is to bring our racial
attitudes under the judgment of God.
Roger Crook approaches racial segregation as fundamentally a moral problem and one which falls within the province of the Christian gospel. He challenges us to live by our faith realizing “our citizenship is in heaven.”
—HAROLD
HENDERSON
CHURCH
HISTORY
The
Story of the Church, A. M. Renwick, Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.,
Grand Rapids, Mich. 1958 (paperback) $1.25.
This
volume of 222 pages is a concise history of the church. Added to this
fact the economy of the paperback and we have a book worth
consideration. I think it is possible, especially for beginners, to
become so involved in a ‘several volume’ church history,
that learning becomes the more difficult. Learning is an accumulative
process and we are limited as to how much we can ingest at one time.
Therefore, to begin our studies a good one volume church history has
the more merit.
Mr.
Renwick says, “Church history is the story of the Christian
community and its relationship to the rest of the world throughout
the ages. This study is not merely one which satisfies our curiosity
as to what happened in past times; it is of great practical value for
the present. Man is essentially the same in every age, although his
surroundings and the circumstances of his life may differ. He has
had, essentially, the same weaknesses and the same aspirations all
through history. In spite of changing circumstances, and the presence
or absence of certain factors, man has basically varied but little
within historic times.”
We
remember how God worked in the history of the Jews. That the lives of
all the great personages, and the outstanding events in the history
of the nation were known beforehand by God. They were not only known,
by God, but were designed to delineate the Christian system “the
Reign of Messiah.” At the time of God’s foreknowledge and
foreordination, Israel was acting as a free moral agent, choosing
their own destiny. If this be true, the all superintending providence
of God relative to the Jewish nation, is it also true of the kingdom
of Christ? Have the great events of history happened by chance?
Especially those effecting His people? Are their any accidents in
history? Or can we trace behind these events the hand of Providence
guiding all that comes to pass?
After
John was given the epistles to the seven communities in Asia, before
being allowed to step into the future, he was shown the “throne
scene” in chapters four and five. The reason, I think, was that
before the future of the body of Christ was unveiled, with all its
woes, corruptions, and persecutions, the throne scene was to set
forth, to those students of ender spirits, that all things emanated
from and resolved themselves into the “throne occupant.”
That He was and is, both center and circumference of the universe.
That all things will work to the glorification of “Him who is
seated on the throne.”
All of
this demonstrates the importance of church history. Is God still
superintending His people? Can we see the hand of Providence
directing the affairs of the world, down through the ages? Renwick
says, “Consider, for example, how the Reformation was saved,
just when it seemed that nothing could prevent Luther and his
associates from being crushed. The emperor Charles V, having made a
peace treaty with his enemy, the King of France, was trying to stamp
out the new movement when there came a new distraction. The Mahometan
Turks came marching up the Danube in their thousands, and were
thundering at the gates of Vienna in the very heart of Europe. Thus
Charles V had to make peace with his Protestant subjects and seek
their help against the common enemy. As a result the Reformed Church
escaped probable annihilation.”
If we can see God working with His people, in mass, will it not make it easier to recognize His working with us individually? Then we are just a step from conceiving the idea of our life as a plan of God. A study of God’s dealings with His people is rewarding.
—CLINT EVANS
The
Ecumenical Movement and the Faithful Church. John Howard Yoder.
Herald Press, Scottdale, Pennsylvania. 1959. 42 pages. 50 cents.
This
booklet is an honest attempt to face up the problem of ecumenicity,
as it affects the Mennonites. In the section dealing with early
efforts toward Christian unity, no mention is made of the work of the
Campbells, Stone, and their fellow laborers. That fact made the book
of more than passing interest. The members of the disciple
brotherhood need to learn that others have concerned themselves with
the tragedy of division, and have striven for a scriptural answer.
The
author, an instructor in Goshen College Biblical Seminary, has
completed requirements for the Doctor of Theology degree of the
University of Basel, Switzerland. He appears eminently qualified to
deal with the challenge of a movement which is at the forefront of
discussion in modern religious circles. In his statement of the
problem, he is especially apt and discerning in laying a proper
foundation for study of the question.
He says:
“We must remember, lest we be not only pharisaical but clearly
dishonest, that we are not a faithful church. No Biblical Christian
can affirm that he, his congregation, or his broader brotherhood is
fully faithful.” Proceeding on this basis, the author rejects
some of the “easy” methods of approach which are so
superficial and over-simplified. He concludes that the answer “can
be found only if we search the Scripture. We must ask whether the New
Testament knows anything about the ‘ecumenical problem’
and, if it does, we must find, and accept, its answer.”
The entire thesis is interesting and contains proposals which might well become the subject of forum discussions among all of us.
—W.
CARL KETCHERSIDE
DEVOTIONAL
CLASSICS
(See
inside back cover for listing)
Man is
prone to extremes, and monomania is one of them. We, who are
endeavoring to restore primitive Christianity, can become so involved
in a legalistic approach to the religion of Christ, that we lose
sight of the inner life, or spiritual values, of the first
Christians. This legalistic approach, or confidence in knowledge, is
a form of conceit. Man, in pursuing knowledge feels more sovereignty
and less dependence on God. If he can reduce his relationship to God
to mere ritualistic patterns then he becomes, almost, the sovereign
arbiter of his own conduct. Though this ritual be ever so simple and
true in its form, to the New Testament concept, without a
corresponding consecration and dedication of self and life, it is
merely a legalism. Listen to James 1:26, “If any man among you
seem (presume) to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but
deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain.”
“Religious” in the original is an adjective. The kindred
noun means the “ceremonial, ritualistic service” of
religion; the “cultus.” A man who is religious is careful
of the outward form, practice, or ritual of Christianity. He may be
as scrupulous in keeping the outward forms of the religion of Christ
as Peter was in keeping the same of Judaism (Acts. 10:14). Still, if
he controlled not his tongue (words) his religion, these outward
forms, were vain. James continues verse 27, “Pure religion and
undefiled,” unfeigned and chaste outward practice of religion,
“before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and
widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the
world (deeds).” The outward practice of religion is worthless
apart from a subjection of self “in word and deed” to the
authority of the Lord; a bringing of self into captivity to the
Christ. This seems to be the import of James’ words. The
leaders of Restoration thought, knowing this, proclaimed that in
order to a restoration of primitive Christianity, there must be a
reformation of life. However, man’s knowledge and attendence to
duty, which this knowledge implies, seldom equal one another.
Knowledge and duty seldom, if ever, equal one another. Man desires to
classify, label and file God in the proper place, because he dreads
responsibility. Responsibility implies dependence, dependence w e a k
n e s s, and weakness misery “doing or suffering.”
Therefore, he becomes very “religious” and often time,
all the while, wretched, miserable, poor, blind, naked, and as those
at Laodicea, nauseating to the Lord (Rev. 3:14-17) .
Could we
be prone to make our religion a religion of the head, to the neglect
of the heart? A religion of the head would resolve everything into
debate. Reason would become a sun rather than an eye; a revelation,
rather than the power of apprehending and enjoying it. The mind, just
as the body, has rules or laws whereby it functions. Hence, we can
have anomalies in minds as well as in physical bodies.
We have
no panacea for the above problem; it is a personal one. However, we
believe that what a person reads has a tremendous influence on the
thinking of that individual. Hence, we would like to suggest some
devotional books to read. Books that will tend to cause us to
meditate; that will compel a deep searching of the inner life. Each
contain short, thought provoking readings of a religious nature. One
quarter of an hour daily to “thoughtful” spiritual
reading can enrich our life.
The first
we would suggest is Psalms. It is listed above in a paperback RSV
vest-pocket edition. This version gives close attention to the poetic
structure of the book. Horne says, “The Psalms are an epitome
of the Bible, adapted to the purposes of devotion. They treat
occasionally of the creation and formation of the world; the
dispensations of Providence, and economy of grace; the transactions
of the patriarchs; the exodus of the children of Israel . . .. the
advent of Messiah, with its effects and consequences; his
incarnation, birth, life, passion, death, resurrection, ascension,
kingdom, and priesthood; the effusion of the Spirit; the conversion
of the nations; the establishment, increase, perpetuity of the
Christian church; the end of the world; the general judgment; the
condemnation of the wicked, and the final triumph of the righteous
with their Lord and King. . . Heroical magnanimity, exquisite
justice, grave moderation, exact wisdom, repentance unfeigned,
unwearied patience, the mysteries of God, the sufferings of Christ,
the terrors of wrath, the comforts of grace, the works of Providence
over this world, and the promised joys of that world which is to
come; all good necessarily to be known, or done, or had, this one
celestial fountain yieldeth.” The book of Psalms contains a
summary of all Scripture, and an abridgment of its most important
instructions and sweetest consolations.
A
Dairy of Readings is a selection of 365 readings of one page
each, from the main stream of devotional writings; one for each day
of the year. They are chosen for their value in stimulating serious
thought and contemplation.
Pascal’s
Thoughts was first published in France in 1670. The volume
consists of notes he had written in preparing to write in defence of
Christianity. He died before he was able to finish the work. There
are 631 of his thoughts in the book, arranged to give them
continuity. They range in length from a sentence to three or four
pages. A portion of one of his longer thoughts I want to record:
“ .
. . We can then have an excellent knowledge of God without that of
our own wretchedness, and of our own wretchedness without that of
God. But we cannot know Jesus Christ without knowing at the same time
both God and our own wretchedness . . .
All who
seek God without Jesus Christ, and who rest in nature, either find no
light to satisfy them, or come to form for themselves a means of
knowing God and serving Him without a mediator. Thereby they fall
either into atheism, or into deism, two things which the Christian
religion abhors almost equally.”
Theologia
Germanica is an anonymous work that grew out of
fourteenth-century Europe. A Europe faced with tragic, distressing
events. For nine years (1314-1322) Germany was divided in her
loyalties to two emperors: one party, backed by Pope John XXII, chose
Frederick of Austria as emperor; the other faction, supported by many
princes of Germany, held loyalty to Louis of Bavaria. This latter
party was desirous of separating the State from the Church; it also
wanted to bring about reforms within the Church. The death of
Frederick in 1322 did not stop the controversy; it only called Pope
John XXII to direct action: he excommunicated Emperor Louis; he
forbade priests to perform the Mass and the sacraments, excepting
baptism and extreme unction, in those cities where Louis was
supported. Some cities overruled the Pope’s interdict, and
forced priest to perform their sacred duties. But it was a time of
discomfort, controversy, and discord in religion and politics.
“The
Great Schism” occurred within the Church. No longer did the
enthusiasm of the Crusades prevail in established religion; the
Church was weakened by her own inner division. From 1309 to 1377 the
popes were mere puppets of France, Rome having ceased to be the
residence of the Vicar of Christ. By 1309 the residence of the pope
was moved to Avignon in France. For the next seventy years—called
“The Babylonian Captivity”—eight popes ruled
Western Christendom from their place of exile in Avignon. In 1378
Gregory XI moved the Papal Court back again to Rome. Then resulted
“The Great Schism.” Urban VI became the Pope at Rome;
Clement VII was elected the Pope at Avignon. This schism lasted from
1378 to 1417.
This
devotional classic composed of table-talk to young monks is written
anonymously. We today wonder why the author did not attach his name
to the document. In the Middle Ages there was more interest in a
writers ideas than in his personality; to leave one’s name
unattached to a work showed the virtue of humility—the Friends
of God especially withheld their names from their writings; sometimes
copyists were negligent to prefix the name of the author. The author
says of himself: “I would be to the Eternal Goodness what a
man’s own hand is to himself.”
Kahn’s
books are devotional nature studies. They are parabolic presentations
drawn from nature.
Through
the Valley is based on the 23rd Psalms. The principle of God’s
creation is told in parables and provides the reader with thought to
handle trouble triumphantly.
Feeling
Low places in our hands the stimuli to know our selves, and our
relationship to others.
Pathways
to Understanding leads us Out of the busy and narrow confines of
our own life into the wonderful natural world of which we are so much
a part, and provides an effective antidote against two of mans most
destructive enemies boredom and haste.
Thoughts Afield are delightful, intimate, meditations, through the seasons. The creature and situations in field and wood, in pond and lake, and the many sided situations in our own lives are reflectively considered. These modern day parables on The Kingdom of Heaven provide insights into what we are, what attitudes we should take toward life and its creator, and the way in which we may grow.
—CLINT
EVANS