The Ancient Order . . .

Restoration Review · 1978
(Volumes 20)


ANCIENT FAITH AND ANCIENT ORDER

At present a very numerous and rapidly increasing party plead for, not a reformation only, but an entire and unqualified restoration of every thing warranted in the holy scriptures, comprehended under two titles of ancient gospel and ancient order. The first of these matters having been intended to include every thing in the doctrine of Christ necessary to make disciples, and the last every thing necessary to keep them disciples.” -Walter Scott, The Evangelist, Vol. 1, p. 20 (1832).

Our theme for this volume is The Ancient Order, which at the outset is to be distinguished from the ancient faith, a distinction clearly defined by our pioneers, and one that we believe is upheld by the scriptures as well. The ancient faith is the gospel itself, the Good News announced by prophets and angels and fulfilled in the coming of the Christ. It was the ancient faith that called lost souls to Jesus and enrolled them as citizens in “the colony of heaven.” Jesus told his disciples to “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.” This is the ancient faith, and there is nothing about it that necessarily implies an order. It was conceivable that the gospel would be preached, sinners would be saved, and that the end-time would come too soon for any order to evolve.

If the ancient faith is the Good News that brings the lost into the community of the saved, then the ancient order is the norms and guidelines for the life, ethics, work, organization, and corporate worship of the saved community. What name or names did they accept as God’s redeemed people? How did they organize their congregations, and what relationship did the congregations have to each other? What was the character of their corporate worship? How did they relate to the world? These questions have to do with the ancient order, which is, of course, closely related to the ancient faith, for it is the faith that undergirds the order, and the order grew out of the faith.

It appears to be the case that the order that evolved with apostolic direction was due to the many problems that arose in the primitive communities of faith. But we must say “the order” with qualification, for there is no single order for all the churches in that some have features in work, worship, and organization that others do not have. Yet generally speaking there is an order that emerges once all the sources are considered, even if it is not a hard and fast pattern. This will be part of our study, to identify the variations and to consider what they mean to us in our quest for the ancient order.

But I repeat: the apostolic order for the churches grew out of a myriad of problems. As the church became more catholic, reaching out as it did to the Gentile nations, the problems intensified all the more. All this had to do with the order that gradually emerged. Had the Lord returned within the first few years, as some believers supposed he would, there would have been little distinguishable Christian order, for there would have been fewer problems and the context of the church would have been mostly Jewish. The order would have been virtually identical to the order of the Jewish synagogue, an influence that remained strong even with the passing of time.

Problems, problems, problems. The primitive congregations had them and the apostles sought to solve them. Thus comes the order. We are not always able to determine exactly what the problem was with this or that community, such as with the Colossians. Yet that little letter is chock-full of goodies on how believers are to order their lives. In writing the letter the apostle helps to answer a question that Francis Schaeffer is popularizing these days, How should we then live?

For example, Paul said to the Colossians, as I read in the Jerusalem Bible: “Make sure that no one traps you and deprives you of your freedom by some secondhand, empty, rational philosophy based on the principles of this world instead of on Christ.” While this gives us some hint of the nature of their problem, it is unlikely that we can appreciate these words as much as they could, for they were written precisely to meet their pressing need. And we understand it all better when we realize that we have this precious morsel only because they had a problem. Whatever their problem was, we are blessed by the information that the Spirit passes along to us, and we can apply it to our own struggle with the world, even if our struggle is not exactly what theirs was. It teaches us that (1) we can be trapped and deprived of the freedom we have in Christ—we can become enslaved all over again; (2) there is in the world out there an insidious intellectual force that has rational and philosophical appeal that is as empty as it is dangerous, and we had better watch out in that it could lead us away from Christ.

This is not a part of the ancient faith as such, for it was written to those who were already in the faith, and it is information they would never have been given had they not had a special problem. It was therefore not necessary to their faith, but to the preservation of their faith, the circumstances being what they were. But this information was written only to this church, and we may conclude that most of the earliest Christians lived and died without ever knowing what Paul said about “the elemental spirits of the universe.” But none of them lived and died without knowing about the Good News, which was the basis of the ancient faith.

Walter Scott, in the quotation that appears at the outset of this piece, articulates the difference between the ancient faith and the ancient order as understood by our pioneers. He sees restoration as twofold: to recover the ancient gospel as preached by the apostles as the means of making men disciples of Jesus; and to restore the ancient order, which includes everything necessary to keep them disciples.

The distinction is of great importance in that it recognizes that folk are “in the faith” when they have believed and obeyed the gospel, even if they are not equally informed in the apostolic order and thus differ here and there. The distinction also suggests that error, a word that has come to have grave implications in our ranks, is more likely to be fatal in reference to the faith than to the order. Walter Scott, for instance, would almost certainly agree that one might for various reasons be confused on various points of order when it would be fatal for him to be confused about the faith. Surely there are essentials to the ancient order, but these are essential to good discipleship, not to becoming a disciple. And they are essential only as one comes to understand them, and this requires time and growth. We are all at one place “in the faith” in that we are in Jesus together. But as in a family or in a school, we are all at different periods of growth or at different grade levels in the apostolic order for our lives.

In failing to make this distinction we miss the beauty of what it means to be faithful. Those who have not yet learned all that is involved in “continuing steadfastly in the apostles’ teaching, in fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and the prayers” may nonetheless have believed and obeyed the gospel Peter preached on Pentecost. They are faithful if they have accepted Jesus as Lord and are obeying him in all things according to their understanding. If people can be faithful only when they correctly perceive and practice all that the apostles enjoined upon the churches, then we all have to doubt our faithfulness.

This is to say that faith is personal, centered, in a Person, and not doctrinal, as is the apostolic order. Order has to do with forms, institutions, ordinances, procedures, the way of doing things, etc. while faith has to do with trust in Jesus. All these are based on faith in Jesus, and the order is given so that we might express our faith, and it is not simply arbitrary instruction. God is for us, and so the apostolic order is for the enrichment of the fellowship, and we are to delight in it. But the order is of such a nature, in that it requires schooling, that it is to be distinguished from the Good News that initially enrolls us in the school when it is believed and obeyed.

The book of Revelation illustrates the point we are making. Few among us would contend that we have to understand it alike. But why? It is explicit about providing a blessing to all who read and listen to it (l:3), and it pronounces a curse on those who would add to it or subtract from it (22:19). If being faithful means to understand and obey everything in the New Testament, then the faithful are very few indeed since Revelation is part of the New Testament.

But if we realize that Revelation is part of the apostolic order given to those harassed believers who were perplexed by the apparent triumph of pagan and secular powers over the kingdom of God, we can see how brethren can be “in the faith” and yet differ in their interpretations of the book. This gives Revelation its rightful, important place. We study it in our search for the ancient order in that it deals with the Christian life under great oppression and persecution, and we learn something of how we are to deal with similar problems in our pilgrimage.

This is not to minimize the doctrinal order, but to give it its proper place. First the faith, then the order. The faith undergirds the order and the order strengthens the faith. Indeed, we consider the apostolic order of such importance that we are making it our theme for the year. But if at the outset we confuse those instructions that set the churches in order with the proclamation that brought the churches into existence, our labor will be in vain. —the Editor