No, 59, May 2003
WHAT THE QUARREL WAS ABOUT
(This will appear as the Introduction to A Lover’s Quarrel. My Pilgrimage of Freedom in Churches of Christ, by
Leroy Garrett, soon to be published by ACU Press, This portion, plus the two
addenda already published in this newsletter, give you an idea what the book is
about. You yet have 19 chapters to read, and there will be 22 pictures, To
order see instructions under Between Us.)
You may recognize that the title for this book is borrowed
in part from the poet Robert Frost, who instructed that his epitaph read: He had a lover’s quarrel with the world. It
occurred to me that the poet’s quarrel with his world and my quarrel with my
church have similarities.
The poem that best depicts my own pilgrimage is The Road Not Taken. Frost describes
himself standing at the fork of a road. One road is well-traveled, well-worn,
and is the way of ease and certainty. It is the road the crowd takes, the way
of conformity. The other road is less-traveled, perhaps because it may be
lonely, uncertain, and venturesome. He takes “the less-traveled way” “because it was grassy and wanted wear.”
Frost places all of us at the fork of the road, noting that it makes a big
difference which road we take.
Two roads diverged in
a wood, and I
I took the one
less-traveled by,
And that has made all the
difference.
Frost saw his quarrel as a lover’s quarrel, as do I. If a quarrel
is vindictive and divisive, it only compounds the problem one is seeking to
solve, whether in the world or in the church. That must be the kind of
disputation Paul had in mind when he urged, “The Lord’s servant must not quarrel”
(2 Timothy 2:24 ). But there is lots of quarreling in the Bible, even God with
His people. We may presume that it was usually done in love, certainly on God’s
part.
But love is not always evident. The urgent cry of a prophet
or a reformer may appear to be madness more than an expression of love. Jesus
was thought to have a demon and Paul was accused of being beside himself Did
Luther’s quarrel with the Roman church appear to be a lover’s quarrel?
Alexander Campbell admitted to being “tart and severe” in his exposure of
clerical abuses, but could it not have been in love? Mother Teresa embarrassed
politicians and dignitaries including a
sitting President at a Washington,
D.C. prayer breakfast when she scored our nation for its millions of abortions.
Was her quarrel a Lover’s quarrel?
Perhaps the best case I can make for my quarrel being a
lover’s quarrel is that made by Raccoon John Smith back in the 1820s. When some
Baptists were fed up with his efforts to reform them, they urged him to “go on
and leave us alone and join the Campbellites.” His response was “I love you too
much to leave you.” The argument is persuasive: One doesn’t leave because he loves too much to leave.
Once you realize the extent
of my quarrel, you may wonder why I didn’t just leave the Churches of Christ.
As I have said for fifty years, and I say once more: I will never leave the Churches of’ Christ, never, no matter what, for
I love my people too much to leave them. Even if they kick me out, I’ll
stay around!
There is more involved here than love. When a reformer stays
with his people and works for change, he is saying that he believes in them and
expects better things of them. His quarrel is a compliment.
And what was the quarrel about? Freedom! I was urging my
church to join me in a pilgrimage of freedom.
Freedom from sectarianism, legalism, and obscurantism.
Freedom to fully embrace the grace of God, and to be
joyfully confident of our salvation.
Freedom to exult in the indwelling presence of the Holy
Spirit whose mission is to conform us
to the likeness of Christ.
Freedom to accept the Spirit’s gift of unity with forbearing
love in spite of all our differences
and hangups.
Freedom to accept as sisters and brother all those who are
devoted to Jesus Christ as Lord, wherever they may be.
Freedom to think for ourselves and to question the dogmas
handed down by our forebears. including the dogma of anti-instrumental music.
Freedom from the tyranny of opinionism making opinions and methods tests of
fellowship and from a herd mentality
and blind conformity, which hinder growth in Christ.
Freedom to examine new ideas, to venture beyond party lines,
and to march by a different drum-beat.
Freedom even to be wrong in the quest for truth. Freedom to
pick up the broken pieces and start over
whether a tragic divorce, drug addiction, a gay lifestyle, or a wavering
faith and to be loved and accepted
during the struggle.
Freedom to take a critical look at our history and admit
where we’ve been wrong and to get back
on course.
Freedom to bring women into the church as equals in
ministry, and to bring an end to male domination.
Freedom to make use of modern Biblical scholarship, and to
be honest about the difficulties one faces in the interpretation of
Scripture without being called names
or having one’s motives impugned.
Freedom to participate in Body life in the assembly with believers sharing their joys and
sorrows, and encouraging each other in the faith with professionals serving more as facilitators than as
performers.
Our Lord assures us that it is truth that makes us free, and
truth may call for change. And change is often painful. I agree with Thomas
Jefferson that no person, church, or nation can expect to move from despotism
to liberty in a feather bed.
And in stating what my pilgrimage of freedom has been about,
Jefferson said it better than I can: I
have sworn upon the altar of God. eternal hostility against every form of
tyranny over the mind of man.
I am indebted to several
people for this modest contribution to the reading public. Had it not been for
my dear wife Ouida who for years
stayed after me to tell my story “before someone else does” it would not have happened. And it was she,
along with a few other persistent friends, who convinced me that perhaps mine
is a story that should be told, for it is the story of a church as well as a
person.
I am especially indebted to the insightful guidance of Dr.
Wayne Newland of Falmouth, Maine a
teacher, preacher, and school administrator now in retirement. Well acquainted
with Churches of Christ, he was most helpful not only in what should be told
but how it should be told.
I also thank Dorothy Koone, a fellow member of the Singing
Oaks Church of Christ in Denton, Texas and a writer of study materials for the
ACU Press. An English teacher now in retirement, she offered both helpful
suggestions and encouragement.
I am grateful to Dr. Allen Dennis, professor of history and
chair of the history faculty at Troy State University in Alabama, who not only
critiqued the manuscript but also wrote the Preface. His own story partly told in his prefatory remarks is a testimonial to what this book is
about. I take heart that his story
itself a pilgrimage of freedom in Churches of Christ could be told a thousand times over.
THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL
It is a fearful scene, one fraught with mystery and
intrigue. The story is in Daniel 5. The occasion was during the Babylonian
captivity in sixth century B.C. Belshazzar, the Babylonian king, is having a
banquet for a thousand of his rulers from his vast empire. They are indulging
in extravagant luxury. While they are reveling with both their wives and
concubines, the king sends for the gold and silver vessels that his father
Nebuchadnezzar had taken from the temple in Jerusalem that they might drink
from them.
Not content to simply carouse in a drunken stupor, the king
in his blatant haughtiness chose to desecrate what was holy. In an arrogant
display of raw power he mocked the God of heaven by desecrating what was deemed
sacred. They not only drank from the sacred vessels, but praised their own gods
of gold and silver as they did so. He chose the most dramatic way he knew to
show his contempt for the God of the enslaved Hebrews. We may presume that this
was consistent with his lifestyle. He wasn’t the kind that attended Sunday
school!
That is when it happened. It was spooky. The fingers of a
man’s hand appeared and wrote on the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace.
The king watched in terror as the hand wrote. Not only did
his face flush, but his knees knocked and his joints gave way. He became a
basket case. He feared that the handwriting on the wall was an indictment
against his insolence, but he didn’t know in what measure.
At this point the queen mother came into the banquet room.
telling Belshazzar that Daniel, who had interpreted the dreams of his father
Nebuchadnezzar, could solve his problem. Daniel was summoned and proceeded to
reveal the message on the wall. It was not good. He rebuked Belshazzar for his
pride and his idolatry that he would
dare to drink wine from sacred vessels while invoking his own gods of gold and
silver. He had not humbled himself as his father had who had learned that “it is the Most High God who rules in the
kingdom of men, and appoints over it whomsoever he will.”
Then Daniel read the handwriting on the wall: Mene, Mene, Tekel. Upharsin, which
meant: “You have been weighed in the balances and found wanting.” Belshazzar’s
kingdom was ending; it would be divided and given to the Medes and Persians.
That very night the king was murdered. Darius the Mede took over his kingdom.
It was to Belshazzar’s credit that God was able to get his
attention. Like the devils, he believed and trembled. Many people never read
God’s signboards. They couldn’t care less. They have no fear of God before
their eyes. Even if they believed “the handwriting on the wall” was from God,
they wouldn’t care what it said. This is what “sloth” in the seven deadly sins
means blatant indifference. It borders
on being an unforgivable sin in that
so long as one is rigidly indifferent he cannot be reached. However bountiful
grace may be, it has to be accepted.
God often writes on the walls of our lives, and in different
ways. It is always a judgment or a warning. It may be a judgment on the
direction our lives have taken, or a warning to slow down or to take heed.
The handwriting on the wall sometimes exposes the guilty
man’s treachery such as when an
unexpected witness shows up in court to testify against him, or when a body
washes ashore to provide damaging DNA evidence. The handwriting on the wall
sometimes reads, Be sure your sin will
find you out. It says to the one who supposes he can put one over on God,
“Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows that shall he
also reap” (Gal. 6:7).
To us nice folk the notes may be gentle reminders of the
brevity of life. We live and make plans as if we are to be around for a long
time. The handwriting might be a heart attack
or the “C” word from the doctor. It might be no more than a
multiplication of wrinkles or tiring more quickly. The psalmist may have been
disturbed by the transitory nature of life when he wrote, “So teach us to
number our days. that we might gain a heart of wisdom” (Ps. 90:12).
The handwriting might remind us that life often gives us but
one chance. Lost opportunities haunt us all. A child’s lament to a too-busy
father, “I wish you had time to come to my game,” might be words on the wall.
The call for repentance to change
one’s life can go unheeded for so long that, like Esau, it at last eludes us
even when we seek it diligently with tears (Heb.12: 17). Lest we take heed, the
time comes when we can only tremble with fear.
But there is grace in this story, even if unheeded. The
handwriting on the wall was a call for king Belshazzar to repent, and to
acknowledge that it is the God of heaven who rules over the kingdoms of men, as
his father had. God seems always to offer one more chance. That is grace. But
the time comes when it is too late.
There is grace in the story for us. God’s warnings the handwriting on the wall in our
lives are expressions of his grace. He
keeps trying to get our attention in
all sorts of ways.
The thoughtful but anonymous Texan who created a number of
signboards allegedly from God may have been inspired by the story in
Daniel when he had one of them read: Now
which of the commandments is it that you don’t understand? God. I also like the one that read, We need to have a talk. God.
Leroy
Between Us . . .
Ouida and I are staying close to home for most of the spring
and summer. We made a most interesting trip to visit my brother Bill and his
wife Betty who have retired to College Station/Bryan, Texas after a lifetime in
Dallas. Their home is less than a mile from the Texas A&M University
campus, a.k.a. “Aggieland.” A consummate Aggie since his college days.
Bill my only living sibling out of
seven is close at hand just in case
the university needs him! They took us to see the George Bush Presidential
Library and Museum, which is on the university campus. It is fabulous easily worth a trip to Texas to see! A
painting of “First Son” hangs in the foyer. an impressive likeness. We visited
the A&M Church of Christ on Lord’s day, a huge church with lots of Aggies as you might guess. Now
that 1 have my autobiography finished, I have started on another book, which
will be stories in the life of Alexander Campbell.
This is our next to the last newsletter, number 59. With
number 60 later in the summer we will call it quits. After forty years of Restoration Review which ran 200 pages a year and almost eleven years of the newsletter.
I may be where the young man was who finally, after years of dating, finally
popped the question to his girl friend. Once he proposed. and she quickly said
yes. he sat silent as if in a daze. “Well, is that all you’re going to say, she
asked? He then said. “I’m just thinking that maybe I’ ve said too much
already!”
But some of you write kindly letters, as if perhaps I
haven’t said too much. I thank you for your graciousness. I’ve started a
folder labeled “Valedictory” where I file your farewell letters of
appreciation. I’ll have them on hand to read in my old age! I’m impressed how
close the bond can grow between writer and reader people who have never met
over years of sharing ideas. It becomes a heart-to-heart friendship as
well as mind-to-mind experience. This is because we’ve shared life-changing
truths.
I’m both humbled and gratified that almost 400 of you have
already ordered my upcoming autobiography A Lover’s Quarrel: My Pilgrimage of Freedom
in Churches of Christ which I see
as the story of a church as well as a person. Those who have ordered the book
will receive it soon after it is off the press, with invoice enclosed, at 20%
off retail price, which itself will be modest.
Those who yet wish to order the book will receive the 20%
discount. until the book is published. Order in one of three ways: by e-mail to
our address on front of this newsletter; or write to us regular mail; or call
us at 940-891-0494. Please include the address to which the book is to be
mailed. It will be several months yet before publication.
A new book, The Jesus
Proposal, by John York and Rubel Shelly, is one more sign of how Churches
of Christ are changing mostly for the
better. This book, after the tradition of Isaac Errett. calls for unity on the
basis of Christlikeness, or what Campbell called “the catholic rule of union.”
In this book we are at last addressing the church at large. $21 postpaid.
The Stone Campbell
Movement: The Story of the American Restoration Movement by Leroy Garrett
is out in a new edition and a new price of $35 postpaid, but for a 573-page
book the price is in line.
A shorter history that we highly recommend, dealing
primarily with Churches of Christ history. is Renewing God’s People: A Concise History of Churches of Christ, by
Gary Holloway and Douglas A. Foster. $16 postpaid.
Carl Ketcherside’s The
Twisted Scriptures - a hard hitting book on biblical interpretation is available at $9 postpaid.
In Radical Answers from
the Minor Prophets Gary Hollaway shows how the ancient Hebrew prophets
speak to our age whether crime,
poverty, injustice, or simply the point of life. Only 10.95 postpaid.
We have turned up enough back issues of Restoration Review that we can offer ten different issues over many
years for $5 postpaid.
In So Also In Christ Neal
Punt questions the ancient dogma that everyone is lost except those the Bible
declares to be saved. He believes it is the other way around: everyone is saved
except those the Bible declares to be lost. He presents a compelling case: the
Bible makes it clear who the lost are (those who persistently reject such light
as they have); everyone else is saved or the elect. He seeks a compromise
between dogmatic determinism and a presumptuous universalism. $8 postpaid.
(These titles are available from us. Send check or money
order. Thank you.)
Life’s Greatest Adventure
A recent article in the Harvard
Divinity Bulletin compares scientific and religious “Desire for Eternal
Life,” It notes that one scientific view is to overcome the aging of the body
through hormone therapy and healthy gene selection and thus greatly extend
human life. It is even suggested that immortality meaning in this case endless life on earth might be realized by “repairing the entire
human genome.” This kind of thinking implies that it is physical existence
itself that is the point of life the
longer one lives the better. Aging and death are the enemy. Life’s greatest
adventure is to be “young” on earth forever, or at least a very long time,
Science might do it, they opine,
The Christian view is that God has ordained that life on
earth be brief give or take a few
decades and that aging and death are
not enemies but blessings, Ceaseless life on this earth as we now know it would
become a nightmare. Life’s greatest adventure is to grow old and die! Death is
the door to the main event, that which gives meaning to life on earth. He who
desires endless existence on earth doesn’t know what life is about. It would be
like a caterpillar desiring always to remain a caterpillar rather than turning into a butterfly.